Profile of NorthWeapon

This is just getting funnier and funnier.

1) You still think 4v4 takes individual skill compared to 1v1s and 2v2s. What are these "skills"

All four playlists require "skill" otherwise no team would be on +100 winstreaks and losing/winning wouldn't occur, it'd be purely RNG.

2) You still think that 4v4 is somehow magically able to be balanced on the same level as 1s and 2s, when it clearly isn't considering the permutations of match ups and the game mechanics that are diluted the more players you add into the game.

Look at the graph pictures I have on the thread. 4v4 between September and November has been very balanced. Compare that to right now or before September. 4v4 can be balanced, it's been balanced quite a few times including last patch to some extent (not perfect, but neither is 1v1 perfect)

CRUZZ'S SUCCESSOR

Defensive namecalling... the last straw :-)

I didn't name-call at all??? I was talking about his argument of ignoring 2v2+ and looking at 1v1 exclusively. Name-calling is targeting someone personally. DUSTY and I have been friends on Steam for a while and I don't mean anything I said on COH2.ORG personally.

You're the one questioning my intelligence so idk why you're talking

Also, after a look at your playercard two things become very obvious: almost exclusively allied player with PROBABLY LESS GAMES THAN DUSTY. How you come to the conclusion that you played this game "twice as much" is beyond me, but it looks like just another non-factual claim (thats fancy speak for lie ;-) ).
In case you actually, truly believed everything you said, you might want to go see a doctor as this is a serious condition.

Bro my most played playlist and faction is Ostheer 4v4 it says it RIGHT on the playercard??? I have more Ostheer 1v1s as well. True, I have my preference over the USF faction as of recent, but who doesn't have a preference?

I've reached top 200 for all factions in at least one playlist. I've reached 1st place Ostheer 4v4 and USF 4v4, and a whole lot of other top 20 ranks for different factions/playlists in the past. I have an entire YouTube channel dedicated to it: https://www.youtube.com/user/blasdlagwatasdsa. It's not like I'm hiding anything. This when I friggin wish Relic didn't add a 1 month inactivity ELO removal, then my Axis ranks would've showed. They can't expect me to play this game so frequently, let alone every faction and playlist. I literally had good ranks for every tile in my playercard, I was quite proud of it, now it's just a bunch of 0s. You can test my Axis skills if you would like in a 1v1.

My point was I've played all playlists, all factions, both in randoms and arranged. I have almost 2,500 hours in this game and DUSTY has around half of that (check Steam profiles I have 2,400 something and he has 1,400 something). That's where I got my "played twice as much as you".

And COH2.ORG playercards don't take in every arranged team you played with unfortunately, it has a max. I said I played mostly arranged, most of my games goes to arranged not random so they aren't even recorded in my playercard. I think COH2.ORG removes arranged teams based on longest not played

125 MP, 10 fuel to unlock Shreks to purchase for Volks. Reduce the cost of the munitions purchase to 75.

It costs 150 MP + 15 fuel + 50 munitions to equip a bazooka on USF infantry. Obviously nothing needs to be said about the performance of the PShrek vs. the Bazooka.

I'm not including the costs of OKW teching because the USF weapon rack is not part of USF's teching either. USF has to make a choice on whether to tech faster or to unlock better weapons... every other faction has to do the same w/ regards to weapons, grenades, etc., and so should OKW.

There are so many unique aspects of OKW's design that were put in place when the faction was resource starved. Things like free repair engineers, free medics, free Flak gun that slaughters infantry, light vehicles, and shoots down planes, 5 star veterancy, free flame nade, no fuel needed to unlock powerful AT weapons, no CP requirement for a heavy tank, comically low pop cap for base infantry, Tier 0 AT Gun, and it goes on and on.

All of this made sense when OKW was resource starved but the faction isn't anymore, and no matter how long we wait for the "new meta to stabilize" for the top 150 players, I don't think it changes the fact that a lot of this stuff just needs to be reexamined and probably changed when you compare OKW to other factions, OST included.

You sir are a genius, well said

And 1v1 doesn't fit your narrative?

Keep grabbing 3 days of stats and getting worked up over this. It's a waste of time.

Idk what game you're playing but it only takes you 5 seconds to click on Observer Mode and count how many matches are played per playlist. For every 1v1 match there's at least two more 2v2s, two more 3v3s, and four more 4v4s. And in those playlists you have 2, 4, 6 more players playing than a 1v1 so you have a shitload of players playing gametypes larger than 1v1. This is not including public custom matches which are exclusively 2v2s+.

Saying no one cares is an extreme case of tunnel vision. Maybe no one cares in your small circle. Possibly. But the community as a whole sure as hell does. And there are competitive teams out there, just like you'd find in other team strategy games, if you simply click the ladder leaderboards for those playlists. I honestly can't believe I need to explain this to you.

1v1 does fit my narrative. I've played 1v1 as well, not recently, but I've beaten players like Paul, Hans, Fahu, SageOfSix, etc. Unlike yourself, you're limiting yourself to 1v1s and 2v2s. And I don't get it, if you're a 1v1 player you would know that UKF is underpowered.



UKF has the lowest winrate with 43.8%, second being USF at 52% as of yesterday after taking a huge nose dive. UKF is even worse in 1v1s thanks to last patch.

Spoon feeding. But you still won't open up. Cuz even numbers can't serve as at least a decent argument. I'm positive you're one of the dudes convincing Brad and balance team to make all these ridiculous changes like OKW 100%. Ignoring 80% of the community to support a small number is just a one way ticket to making an unsuccessful game. Brad even mentioned it in the recent stream, apparently he can't listen to the rest of the community and only people like you. And apparently Riot Games does the same thing with "players around 150 but not top 50"... obviously alluding to Dusty and Lemon and a few others, its quite funny. If you don't get players from all playlists to contribute, then you're only pleasing a portion of th e community.