Profile of NorthWeapon

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 615

General Information
Register Time: 6 Oct 2013, 18:47 PM
Last Visit Time: 29 May 2024, 19:29 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/n0rthweapon
Website: https://www.youtube.com/user/blasdlagwatasdsa
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/blasdlagwatasdsa
Steam: 76561198016338237
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: NorthWeapon

Show Latest Posts


Thread: CoH3 multiplayer alpha soon 25 Nov 2021, 23:26 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2021, 02:56 AMdidimegadudu i hope there will be 8v8 on a very large map Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2021, 06:03 AMRosbone This is the correct answer! You sir, have won the internet! That is atrocious! Nay, how could you propose 8v8 when we could have 16v16!!!?!?! In: COH3 Central
Thread: HM-38 120mm Mortar Squad is OP22 Nov 2021, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2021, 12:07 PMskemshead Could not agree more. Given the changes to sovs over the last couple of years, in particular the boost to conscript durability, as well as the fact that sov late game ( in 1v1 ) is universally considered extremely strong almost to the point of being OP, the argument that soviets need high survivability to offset other weakness no longer hold true. Most people are simply asking for retreat to be removed so pressure can be applied and rewarded though good counter play as opposed to the current situation where the best outcome is to chase the unit off with maybe 1 or 2 model drops. Doesn't matter what changes, the design of the Soviets is high survivability. Perhaps it doesn't need to be as accurate but survivability must be maintained to preserve design In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Relic][Dev Diary] Core Gameplay Experience22 Nov 2021, 04:14 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2021, 23:56 PMSpanky We're you there when they announced CoH2? Relic has never been this active/transparent, period. Agreed. * Publishing regular diary videos during the development? * Super early pre-alpha * 2nd alpha test upcoming * Involvement with select few core community members from day 1 * Started with a poll from 2017 on CoH 2 * Added funding and success from AoE 4 as well as engine upgrades * Relative success of AoE 4 also is good news that CoH 3 can also be a great game Really, the only reason this game should turn out to be terrible is if: A) players are dumb and don't really know what they want so when they asked for something from Relic it turned out to be bad B) Relic doesn't listen to the players Otherwise, in theory the game should be great In: COH3 Central
Thread: HM-38 120mm Mortar Squad is OP22 Nov 2021, 04:11 AM 120mm is Soviet... its survivability is supposed to be good... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF after Balancefinders and Scotts get nerfed19 Nov 2021, 03:42 AM So many cry babies who don't know how to deal with pathfinders and scotts. Instead of figuring out how to counter them they complain in forums so their mommy adds in a new patch to nerf them. What a terrible way to get better at the game and solve your losing problem. I've played this game regularly the past few weeks, all factions 1v1 to 4v4 and I really don't see any significant balance issues anywhere. If you lose, instead of complaining on the forum, go to the drawing board and figure out how to deal with it. Relic isn't even updating the game much anymore, so not sure why people are expecting another patch. Read what Aerafield says too In: COH2 Balance
Thread: coh2stats "lie" or can be misinterpreted11 Nov 2021, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2021, 21:30 PMRosbone I will take PageP stats every day of the week over some tards anecdotal spewings in the shout box. But I get what you are saying. Long live PageP!!! You mean Sturmtigers aren't OP? cuz a few game ago some dude wiped my units and I lost. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: coh2stats "lie" or can be misinterpreted11 Nov 2021, 21:25 PM I want to point out that the numbers you find in coh2stats are just numbers and don't necessarily prove anything. If UKF have a lower winrate than say Soviets, it might not be that UKF is a weaker faction. It might so happen to be that there is a disproprotionate amount of players or new players playing one faction over the other. If either Allies or Axis has the lower winrate in general, it is not neccessarily true that one is better than the other, it may be that one side is more popular than the other and matchmaking pairs unequal players against each other And especially this: just because "Mechanized is the 9th picked USF commander" does not mean mechanized is the worst commander. It means that it is the least picked, or it is the least popular. And people can not choose a commander for a variety of reasons from what is cooler, rarity, cost, and so on. So I think it is a red flag when people use these stats to prove some argument (especially balance arguments). Practical example: Axis has higher winrate than Allies on 4v4 but Inka Tournament showed Allies dominating axis. Why? Could it because Allies only gets good at super high level play? Who knows. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturmtiger over nerfed 11 Nov 2021, 21:10 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2021, 19:51 PMSander93 Of course they are comparable, it's just not an argument in balancing. Balance changes are made purely based on a unit itself, not because some other unit in a totally different faction has this or that compared to it. There is no us versus them beyond the petty squables of the fanboys. Everything is balanced individually, based on how something performs within its own faction. Couldn't have said it better. Yes! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Don't Ruin CoH2 Assymetry11 Nov 2021, 17:56 PM To keep it short: CoH is an assymetrical game so balance is not as simple as "...we adjusted unit X to better align with..." And all forum posters and balance modders should not ruin the uniqueness of every faction in the name of balance, because every unit is for a particular team, has different enemies, different themes, different roles in their respective factions, different allies, and different part of an army composition. Riflemen are not the same as Grenadiers for example because Riflemen face MG42s while Grens face tougher mid range infantry squads, and Riflemen are part of a mobile aggressive faction and Grens are part of a combined arms defensive faction. Thus, don't compare and balance units from different factions. Otherwise you don't get coh you get some typical rts game that most of us don't want to play In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturmtiger over nerfed 11 Nov 2021, 17:41 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2021, 13:17 PMKlement Pikhtura why not tho? Imo the units are very similar. The only difference in opposition is that AVRE faces panthers with occasional shreks (not a good counter tho) and ST faces 60 range high pen tank destroyers. Imo this is like comparing p4 to m4 sherman. They face different enemies, they have different stats, but they are both generalist medium tanks. No way m4 Sherman and p4 are the same. M4 belongs to a super aggressive versatile and mobile faction. It is supposed to be fast, accurate while moving and generalist. P4 is supposed to be armored and strong and defensive. Seriously if players like you keep balancing units symmetrically you will ruin the uniqueness of the units for the rest of us. This is unfortunately how many of the balance changes were cuz non-designers made them. The amount of times I read "to be better aligned with..." is all the times a unit's uniqueness was removed. For example IS cover bonuses and out of cover penalties being removed so it can be like other infantry. Terrible decision because the faction was originally designed to be defensive. So no, M4 Sherman is not the same. US need to flank, Germans don't need to as much. Not sure why this needs explanation. You're the type to say "p4 needs to shoot smoke too like m4 sherman" not taking into account that USF doesn't have a MG42 and USF is not super defensive. That's why USF has always been strong against OH, cuz smoke is good against defensive factions. That's why OKW is tough as USF cuz OKW is aggressive too In: COH2 Balance