I kinda dislike it. Killing Sov. and Ost engineers early on also meant that they had to get another one of them before being able to upgrade. Also it was nice to have this tradeoff / important choice: Do I build another mine / repair this light vehicle and thus delay me reaching the new Tech Level by a bit or do I retreat to base and tech up asap but keep my 222 at 80% health
There being complaints about OSt/ Sov. needing Engineers but Ukf and so on not needing it is imo not a valid argument. They could just have agreed upon simply applying this "Engineers needed to tech up" rule to every faction this time. Also we don't know for sure if there won't be factions again that don't have Autotech
I agree here, this is an important point in the game, especially for the Soviets: either you build T1 / T2 but lose some control over the map or build only the infantry and have more control and more infantry on the map but no support. |
On the one hand, yes, on the other, no. If engineers do not build buildings in the game, they have lost a lot of importance, Need to strengthen their main role of construction: each faction should be able to build fortifications / mines / and so on without a commander |
Or, for example, the Flakpanzer 38 (t), which were actively used in Italy in 1944. 36 Flakpanzer 38 (t) were sent to Italy, equipping the air defense platoons of the 26th Panzer, as well as the 29th and 90th Panzergrenadier divisions |
I would prefer the Mobelwagen too. Something new for a change. But at least nice to hear that Wirbel was used in Italy. But I think we won't get one (also because it would look kinda strange to see a unprotected crew that is just sitting on a Pz 4 chassis survive multiple tank rounds; I would like it if unprotectet tank crews like Marder, Su 76, or Mobel could take at least a bit of damage)
Well, I think the question with an open crew is a question of balance. The crew of the 37-mm anti-aircraft gun in the HQ can survive a direct hit from a B-4, or OKW AA half-track. |
Why not, for example, take Möbelwagen (Sd.Kfz. 161/3) instead of Wirbelwind, for a change. A small number of Sd.Kfz. 161/3 ended up in Italy, here they had the 26th and 29th Panzer and 90th Panzergrenadier Divisions (90th received four Möbelwagen and four Wirbelwind) |
American/UK units in soviet maps? NOTHING TO SEE HERE
Soviets in Bulge maps? NOTHING TO SEE HERE
Soviets + Western Allies playing together? NOTHING TO SEE HERE
JADGTIGER? NOTHING TO SEE HERE
CHURCHILL with a 17 pounder? OMG KILL RELIC NOW
An interesting point, Britain and the USSR were seriously discussing about sending a British Expeditionary Force to Murmansk for a joint operation against Germany in Norway. Free France, discussing allied actions between the USSR, chose between an infantry unit or an air unit. Aviation was chosen. |
It's the same for me. 3 Gigabytes 1060. The game requires 6 Gigabytes 1060. |
Ah yes, I'm a socialist liberal (neither of those things) for saying that actual Nazis are attracted to World War II games. I thought this was fairly obvious but of course, if you ask around there are about as many Nazis here as the Nuremberg trials, thankfully because it has been obviously stigmatized to hell and back.
It's funny because forums like these for World War II games are the last places that I see the myths about the Wehrmacht that were debunked by actual historians still spread around. Myths that were written by the actual SS and former high-ranking Nazis looking to avoid a noose and garner additional sympathy from their occupiers. Company of Heroes 2 got in trouble for its campaign which largely (save maybe burning its own soldiers alive) depicted actual atrocities that happened at some point or another in the Red Army over the course of the war, without touching on some of the real atrocities, as you've mentioned, also lovely things like using penal squads as human minesweepers, etc.
I'd wager this game would get an equal amount of backlash if they realistically portrayed Rommel as a lucky opportunist and not 4D chess-playing Nazi Jesus as his popular portrait seems to make him out as, which was, mind you, part of that postwar propaganda which was encouraged by the British because it made them look better for beating him in North Africa when he didn't have a chance of winning it to begin with.
And I love the "Wehrmacht wasn't racist" thing, pretty much every army was fucking racist to whatever degree, it's just the British wouldn't have turned their colonial troops into soap and candles if they didn't have a crippling manpower shortage. If you missed it that was intentional hyperbole by the way.
For the record I don't really have a "side". I think, generally, the glorification of war is troubling, doubly so when it leads people, in whatever small ways, down the path of sympathy for an awful regime, whichever one. I also think the American army committed a ridiculous share of war crimes and incited a racial hatred against the Japanese that at least approached the level of Jews in Germany, but you see a lot fewer people reacting to that with denial or deflection as opposed to merely mentioning that some people harbour sympathy for the Nazis.
No, people didn't like the CoH2 solo company because it was a complete lousy Enemy at the Gate of cliche mythical nonsense. For clarity, I have already cited Mission: Mtsensk. When a bunch of recruits were desperately on the defensive in October when the ice withstood the tanks and blah blah blah. When in reality Mtsensk was defended by more than 6,000 paratroopers who were airlifted with guns, mortars and even eight light T-37A tanks successfully defended the highway before the arrival of tanks and jointly counterattacked, the best tanker of the Anti-Hitler Coalition took part in these battles, after these battles Guderian writes about the superiority of the T-34 over German tanks. But who needs it? It's boring, let's do boring missions and plot. |
Thanks, no. Two friends of mine who want to play 3 versus 3 don't agree with you. Considering that 3 versus 3 and 4 versus 4 are the most popular modes. The conclusion is exactly the opposite, the game should not only be centered around 1 versus 1. |
I managed to play two matches yesterday (until the game crashed). The color palette together with UI literally made my eyes water and hurt. The graphical style and UI definitely need to be changed. |