Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Company of Heroes III - Your expectations17 Jan 2018, 18:03 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2018, 15:24 PMHighfiveeeee Not to be rude but getting rid of the main environmental feature CoH2 offered was the best thing they ever did (Blizzards). I liked the cold system, it added more life and interest to the game. Instead of removing it, we had to redo it, removing this system is a lazy way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic close to shutting down - not profitable17 Jan 2018, 11:30 AM When a letter came to the mail about the "Future of the Company of Heroes", it mentioned a free DLC. Who knows what it was about? In: Lobby
Thread: WW2 Daily Pic6 Jan 2018, 19:25 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2018, 14:13 PMYRon²y hey! can i ask you where you get all these photo's from? would be amazing to know btw, thx for all the pictures you daily post! this is a Russian site, but here you find tons of photos. http://waralbum.ru/ In: The Library
Thread: The new patch4 Jan 2018, 13:59 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2018, 13:35 PMStug life why tiger 2 and not tiger 1 ? Even if we compare the IS-2 with the Tiger, the comparison is not in favor of the IS-2: - The Tiger has six commanders - After the recent patch the Tiger is really good: it kills the infantry perfectly, it is accurate when it shoots at the tanks, and now it has quite good mobility - a useful first veterancy ability (unlike the IS-2) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch4 Jan 2018, 06:56 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2018, 04:09 AMStug life shouldn’t this apply to tiger too ? Maybe, but Tiger (any) in every match, IS-2 only discussions on the forums. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch4 Jan 2018, 06:54 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 23:08 PMinsaneHoshi You do know that all tanks "miss" when shooting at infantry. I think you have no idea what youre talking about and just full of it. In my opinion, you are not playing a game, or defend the King Tiger because you love this imba. Until the patch King Tiger: total wipe the machine, after the patch: total wipe the machine. The King Tiger always wipes a sqiad or two squads in the movement at a great distance. All that IS-2 is capable of: to miss and even more to miss in a huge blob. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch3 Jan 2018, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 19:51 PMKharn The IS-2 is doctrinal, the KT is not... How often do you see the IS-2? it has SUCH a long reload speed, and it's scatter is huge. The penetration is shit, it's a joke of a heavy tank which is why almost nobody uses it. I can think of so many better investments than an IS-2. Yet the big 122 gun apparently struggled to fight anything out there... it's a massive disappointment. I can't believe someone would even argue that the IS-2 is somehow " OP " What world are these people in ? XD I see it only when I build it myself. This tank is in a very bad position: - poor performance - only in two commanders - unnecessary, in order to survive and build an IS-2 you need: Katyusha - the only Soviet anti-blob unit, SU-85 for AT protection. And When IS-2 is ready for build it is unnecessary for you: or everything is bad and this piece of uselessness will not help you, or you are in a good position and you do not need it, or you do not have the resources. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch3 Jan 2018, 12:35 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 12:32 PMinsaneHoshi KT with 375 armour: This is Opie and needs nerfs nao. Is2 with 375 armour: This has paper armour. Needs buffs! King Tiger can easily wipe two squads of shoocks with one shot in motion. IS-2 can only miss in huge blob before him. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch3 Jan 2018, 12:00 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2018, 09:21 AMzarok47 Is-2 has same armor as KT while being dirt cheap compared to it. IS-2 is fine, the myth it's not is really getting old. This armor does not help, because almost all hits on the IS-2 are penetration. But at the same time he has a disgusting gun. That's why he has disgusting performance. Because this "armor" IS-2 does not buffed. Reduce the armor (it's almost always penetrated) and improve the performance of the gun. That's why I think Pershing is a very good tank: I don't expect armor protection, but great mobility and gun. IS-2: armor almost penetrated (it is rather a miracle that the armor is not penetrated), main gun is terrible, low mobility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new patch3 Jan 2018, 08:08 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2018, 10:20 AMinsaneHoshi Its almost like one of those tanks has a much higher price and tech cost, and thus should be better. There is a difference between being better and not being useless. Because IS-2 is a piece of expensive uselessness. Yesterday I took IS-2 and four squads enemy blob advanced on my tank (my IS-2 stood still, which means it was the most accurate) and .... he killed only two people, brilliantly, and this happens to him constantly. Against tanks, it is just as useless: misses, non-penetration. This tank is preposterous. And it does not make sense to use it. P.S. DhSK makes more kills than the main gun. In: COH2 Balance