Profile of Brick Top

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1162

General Information


Thread: This patch killed Katyusha and Werfer13 May 2014, 10:29 AM I agree they do pretty decent damage when up close, if I use them thats the only way I ever fire them. Maybe they could get a slight improvement, but not too much. They should never do too much damage at long range, and even at shorter range, they shouldnt really kill everythin easily, that would be OP imo. To get the most out of them, they should be fired before an assault from other units. Weakening their target. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv13 May 2014, 10:20 AM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 05:52 AM__deleted__ This was done because soviets could not brainlessly charge anymore with shocks and whatever whithout regard to cover. It was a good change, game felt verry tactical. Wrong. It was not done to pander to 'brainless charging', it was done because balance was very clearly in German favor. It was not a good change, it had the right idea, but was implemented far too strongly. If you dont think that makes you sound like you thought it was balanced... lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point13 May 2014, 10:12 AM Yeah in this replay of Barton's, ZiS, T34's and SU85 all constantly miss them: http://www.coh2.org/replay/16954/beating-puma-spam/page/1 I dont think pumas are far from being balanced, they are just a little bit too good, its far too easy to invalidate T34/85s or IS2s.. target weak point and easily penetrating from the front is just insane. I would be fine if they had to flank to penetrate more reliably, or if they just didnt have target weak point. Im going to be playing a lot with puma spam find the best counters, but I fully expect a lot of abuse from my opponents. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: beating Puma spam13 May 2014, 09:30 AM The very fact that pumas are really strong when spammed speaks volumes. They should be a support unit good for flanking, but you should still need T3 along side them :/ Pure con spam will only go so far, because germans just build up LMGs and MGs, and dont forget this doctrine has P4 support tank In: Replays
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv13 May 2014, 09:24 AM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 08:28 AM__deleted__ Exagerration won't help so please don't put words in my mouth. I DON'T have concerns about infantry balance. Get a grip of yourself, read your last post, you imply that the game was balanced before the last patch, which it certainly was not. Yes it was technically possible for a soviet squad to advance around cover and beat a german squad close up, but in real game conditions, soviet squads were getting rofl stomped faaaaar too easily. If you werent a German fan boy, you would clearly know this. If you consider all the top players and people like Ami 'soviet fan boys' for saying the truth that it was not balanced, good day to you. Im fed up of reading your terrible posts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point13 May 2014, 09:13 AM This is fking retarded. Puma is not right at all. It just dances around far too easy with a pak stuck to the top of it and any time you outmanouver them, bam target weak point and they swarm your one tank them disappear into the map just as quickly. There is no tank the soviets have that can face them in equal numbers and having ZiS back up does not help that much. They are just too manouverable. It makes things far too easy. Either they NEED target weak point removing, or their penetration lowering a bit so that heavy tanks are actually useful frontally vs them. Dont forget soviets have weak infantry AT, make a unit which dances in circles around any soviet armour is not good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv13 May 2014, 07:49 AM SSHeini, if you believe infantry play is heavily unbalanced now, you are the only fan boy around here. Its closer than ever. You really need to take a look at all your own posts. All you do is cry for German buffs. If you have any serious concearns, I honestly encourage you to post a replay. Im sure we can help with your infantry /combined arms use. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Western Armies - Tiers and Units?12 May 2014, 17:05 PM Well from that interview, they were talking about the airborne needing to find good areas of the map to bring in reinforcements. This presumably means they drift a lot on call in and can land over a large area, possibly being hurt if they hit trees etc.. this could add tactics for fighting for a good DZ, also area denial for Germans. It could also add a risk reward element for bringing them down in risky locations. It also suggests to me that parachuting in is much more of a feature than in coh1, where only the elite inf dropped in and could reinforce anywhere. Perhaps much more of the USA inf will be airdropped, and perhaps reinforcing will be in a very different way to coh airborne. Something sounds super fishy about these new Germans, but what is anyones guess. In: Lobby
Thread: ISU-15212 May 2014, 15:11 PM Stugs are beasts now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15212 May 2014, 10:06 AM Anyone else think its ironic that people want Ele and ISU toned down, yet relic is about to release the German army with bigger and badder tanks than ever lol. In: COH2 Balance