Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Proposed Soviet Tech System1 Mar 2015, 03:49 AM Problem N° 1 50 (T2) + 60 (T3) + 70 (T70) - 50f (Initial) = 130f Yeah, 6-7min T70 rush all day everyday. Stuart sucks, T70 is great cause it's mobile, has insane vision and it's deadly on the right hands. SU starts with fuel, USF not, so Stuart/T70 timings are not equal. Problem N°2 If you ever consider not locking M3 25 (T1) + 20 (f) > instant M3 at beggining of the game. More time to wipe things on retreat against OKW before shrecks -.-.--.-.-..--.-. If your idea is this 50% tech cost: T1: Penals > M3 + Snipers T2: Mortar >= Maxims > Zis T3: M5 > T70 + T34 T4: Su76 + Su85 > Katy In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Soviet Commander: Tank Hunter Tactics 1 Mar 2015, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2015, 22:12 PMnee Salvage is OK but requires a massive munitions upgrade just for the opportunity, and your engineers will be busy repairing or building before you risk them running around finding wrecks. IMO it should be free passive rather than an expensive upgrade, it's barely comparable to OKW's salvage. For the note: OKW is 5 fuel (15? muni with scavenge). SU Salvage gives you fuel and MP relative to the cost/health of the tank/wreckage i think. On that Lennys game i remember he got like +50f and +200mp from the Tiger wreckage. If it's free passive it should give way less resources. PD: if someone has it, check to salvage onmap wrecks and how much resources does it gave. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Without a good balance, you will still play COH 2?1 Mar 2015, 00:49 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2015, 00:15 AMturbotortoise Well, I'm playing now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Do you Execute the Wounded? 28 Feb 2015, 18:31 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2015, 03:28 AMASneakyFox also shooting crawlers can backfire- it can show what units you have, wheras if you just walk away and leave them the other plakyer might not get to see anything. On the contrary, crawlers give vision to your opponent. In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?28 Feb 2015, 02:57 AM While i don't find annoying the intention of your post, it grinds my gears when you state things without knowing or being sure of, so this is why you see me correcting you. Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2015, 02:33 AMAlexzandvar Iv already said I know the PIV is a better tank But not due to the correct facts, which i just corrected. Check the post you made above. "It's good at killing infantry because it has a good ROF" "The 76 has a worse ROF, but as far as killing infantry goes both guns are the same." "I didn't take into account the hull MG's because getting them to hit what you want to accurately is a pain in the dick." The FIRST T34-76 is fine as a "tempo/shock" unit against 4 models entities or units without AT capabilities or snares. The unit on itself is lackluster. Not bad, but inneficient for it's role. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?28 Feb 2015, 02:27 AM @Alex i post all the list, cause it's faster to copy paste an old post. Accuracy doesn't matter on vehicles, since they basically hit using scatter values (desviation of the shot), AoE, and damage drop off. Note: theres also a small difference in Area of effect distance near. "PIV main gun is better than T34 main gun against infantry (and tanks too), PIV hull MG is better, PIV coaxial is better, and PIV has a pintle that has higher DPS than the T34 pintle+coaxial combined as well" When you combine ALL the factors you end up with a better AI tank, which is actually a real threat to infantry. Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 22:08 PMAlexzandvar Every stat I can find only points to the t-34/76 being slightly worse than the PIV in anti infantry, and that's just because the T34 has a worse ROF. -Rof -Number of Mgs -DPS of MGs -Scatter -Area of effect distance This without taking into account +45% of deflecting snares or inexistence or inneficience of allied infantry AT. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?27 Feb 2015, 23:20 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 19:37 PMAlexzandvar T34... It's a better crusher than the PIV because it has higher speed, acceleration and basic turn speed. It's good at killing infantry because it has a good ROF, nice splash, and can take a hit or two before having to retreat. I'm not grasping at straws, it's a good generalist tank that just doesn't have late game viability. Just so we kill the myth of the T34 having a GOOD AI capability. T34 MGs are way worst than PIV and had worst AI capabilities on its main gun. Saving grace is fighting 4models against OH but not so against OKW. Tiger: 5.25 PIV: 5.75 KV1: 5.75 Wolverine: 5.85 OKW PIV: 6 M4A3: 6.05 KT: 6.25 T3485: 6.4 OH PV: 6.5 E8: 6.55 IS2: 6.65 T3476: 6.75 Jackson: 7.25 OKW PV: 7.5 Yep, good ROF. Nevertheless, it's a GOOD OPTION IF you are ahead on the match or even, and your opponent is not gonna pull any medium. This lets you gain control of the map and have enough resources to pull your call ins by the time your opponent can do the same. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Map Hacking27 Feb 2015, 23:08 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 22:57 PMSarantini never until couple days ago when someone riflenades all my mines. And demos, rushes a Panther into an M3 which is hidden on a corner of the map, etc... Other top ranked AT also met them at experience the same. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: (Infiltration) Grenades against buildings27 Feb 2015, 18:37 PM Small arm fire op, 1 shotting houses and shit (it looks funny and silly) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: (Infiltration) Grenades against buildings27 Feb 2015, 18:25 PM Sigh, just remove infiltration grenades from the title and the discussion. Should grenades almost 1 shot buildings? It's 2013 all over again, but instead of being random, we all know what's it's going to happen. In: COH2 Balance