Profile of voltardark

Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2014, 17:51 PMwooof

the answer to all of your questions is because its a team game. in 1v1, you have to use your mp to build infantry. if you dont, youll get overrun. in large team games, a player can get by with very few squads while he fast techs/builds caches/drops fuel/ etc.

rushing a walking stuka, for example, means the okw player builds the mechanized tier first. in 1v1s, a lot of players like to start with the med truck because it helps their infantry a lot more. in team games, an early med truck is less important. that means in team games they can start converting to fuel right away and get out a fast stuka. thats not even counting if a wehrmacht player builds an early fuel cache.

im a little unclear what your suggestion is based on your last post. you say fuel income should be like 1v1s (and not x4). so for example say a player is getting 20 fuel per minute in a 1v1, are you suggesting in a 4v4, the team as a whole should get only 20 fuel (5 fuel per player per minute)?

Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2014, 15:34 PMZombiFrancis

I get what you mean, except that doubles in tennis is still a fun and competitive game. Different, but still a contest. Tennis ain't just 1v1.

Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2014, 13:51 PMOZtheWiZARD

This game has been build with 1v1 in mind.
2v2 it's the most balanced mode from team modes but even there I wouldn't expect it to be 100% as a lot depends from your team mate and your coordination. That's why it's hard to even spot balance issues in these games.
Can you ever be certain that the problem you had last game was due to game imbalance or was it due to lack of team play.

3v3 and 4v4 are just funfairs. I don't even know why people are having these ideas of these modes being balanced. No to mention the skill difference.
The truth is a lot of people are playing 3v3 and above because they're getting their arses kicked in 2v2 and 1v1.
True story. Been there, done that.

Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2014, 00:39 AMbroodwarjc

If the game is going competitive then they need to focus on 1v1 which is where competitive play is at. Right now because of the lack of competitive support the majority are casual players who play 3v3 and 4v4. If the game goes competitive then expect 1v1 and 2v2 to become a lot more popular.

So no, they don't need to balance the game for 3v3 and 4v4, they need to balance the game for 1v1 and 2v2. I hate to be nasty about it, but people asking them to balance 4 factions across 4 modes and make it "fun" it just unrealistic. The game being "fun" is purely objective and some players think fun is playing as the Germans and others as the Allies. You can have fun in 3v3 and 4v4 playing as the Allies. You just will have a harder time winning.

If you think winning as the Allies is fun then you should play 1v1 and 2v2 which is more skewed towards those factions.[/quote

This game need as much balance in 3vs3 and 4vs4 as the other modes.

Clans need those larger modes of play to have fun. We paid for this game as much as the others and we are also numerous.
They should not have put those modes of play if they don't want to support it. They just have to tell us that they will do nothing, and we will drop the game.

Play you games and let us have our balance. This is the way we like to play the game. If the game lose our support, it won't go anywhere.

It's that kind of comment that kill a game.

Thank you.