Profile of voltardark

Like I've mentioned above, acceptable framerates are entirely subjective. You find 50-60FPS acceptable; I find 60-70+FPS acceptable. I notice a significant difference between 50-60FPS and 60-70+FPS, and I find it very frustrating to play with, especially when I've neutered the visual experience and still can't maintain what I believe are acceptable framerates. That's why I posted this thread. In my opinion, the framerates I get make the game frustrating to play. If I'm alone in that opinion, then nothing needs to be done. But I think the response to this and other performance-related threads over the course of CoH2's lifespan make it clear that this isn't just a fringe issue.

Let's say that having between 50-60 fps, one can have fun and perform great at this game.

Being a person of great influence on the Coh realm, you have a responsibility to be more objective then most. (Having great talents bring greater responsibilities.)

The magnitude of the performances issues are not enough to warrant the comments you have made. Coming from anybody else, i would'have care. Please, i beckon you to rectify your post.

I also think that you should take on the 1vs1 ladder and show how great you can be. It may take some time, but i'm pretty sure your place is at it's top !!!! No more excuses.

With you, it will bring the competition at a greater level and with it more player will play.

P.S. : I'm not related to Sega-Relic in any ways.
I'm just a coh2 player that want that game to grow and succeed.

Thank you.

I play mostly in 4vs4 and the game is always between 50-60 fps with the specs posted above. So i would suggest not to exaggerate on the topic of performance as the game is really fine in that matter. If someone don't like the game, it's fine, but using performance issues as an excuse for not playing is not. I'm a computer engineer whose hobby is playing computer game since i was 12 years old and i'm now 47, so i may know something in the matter.

i played vcoh 7 years and yes that engine is lighter. But Coh2 is damn fine for competitive play on a middle rig as it is.

90% performance issues are from a computer not fully optimized. Maybe for games that are not as computer intensive as Coh2 it's wont be matter. Coh2 is one of the most demanding game on the market, it need a fully optimized computer to perform at it's best. ( Even for a new rig).

If anyone need help to optimize their computer, just page me. Ill gladly help.

I use Glary Utilities 5 to perform optimizations. (it's free and the best tool of the market) and i'm not advertising.

Hoping to help and this post is not intended to offense someone in any ways. (just telling the facts)

See you on the battlefield.

Rear echelon at vet2(5men) with double zooks. ive noticed that the zooks get them plenty of infantry kills. I think zooks and shreks get equal infantry kills.

Then both weapons should be toned down. (US have bars).

thanks !

Common Guys, the game is way better and fun that it was at release.

Relic's devs do a good job at supporting and improving the game with the resources available to them. As inverse said, Coh1 had far less support that Coh2 as patchs took months to come out.

Now i play more Coh2 then before, team play is becoming better and balance is improving nicely.

This game is complex and hard to learn, people should try to practice and play it a bit more before criticizing the balance.

I trust relic'devs and we should all support them. But this must be done without giving them a blind approval.(yes there are still some balance and design issues to address...)

This is our favorite game so let's try to work together to make it meet our greatest aspirations.

See you all on the battlefield !

Making penals a bit more versatile would help to add some additional gameplay options. They only would need the global at_nades. Just up their manpower's cost up 5%.

Thanks !