Profile of wooof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 950 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2014, 19:05 PMQueenRatchet123 A long 4v4 game with allied is harder than axis. I dont care if u dont agree. its just a fact. play the game and look at the axis % vs allies. in 2v2's and above its almost allways 70% and above. Even very skilled usf players are sure to lose in a long 4v4. Soviets are the only hope in large games. well then i guess theres not much to discuss if you dont care. why even bother posting? your "evidence" is simply the number of players playing axis/allies. beyond that you just state your opinion as fact. looking at your playercard, you have only 29 games played as axis with only 13 wins. thats a 44% win ratio overall. you actually havent even won a game in 3v3 or 4v4 axis. sorry, but your stats arent matching up with your claims. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 19:02 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2014, 18:52 PMvoltardark Sorry it wasn't what i meant. I mean reducing the fuel production of all strategic points by 1 unit. Thanks for the comments. ah. i get it. thats my bad, i misread what you wrote. im still not convinced that will have a positive effect though. this would just indirectly buff caches/opels as well as okw munitions conversion (if munitions arent changed, okw will gain the same fuel bonus from conversion, but other factions will now have relatively less fuel). even ignoring that, im not sure what lowering fuel will solve the issues you are having with allies. this would lower fuel income for both sides by about 5 fuel per minute, which would delay tanks roughly a minute or two. it actually wont even delay heavy tanks at all since those are already delayed by cps more than fuel costs in team games. the issues you brought up were jacksons dieing to schrecks and su85s not being mobile. im not sure how less fuel changes anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2014, 15:48 PMvoltardark Our main concern is about 3vs3 and 4vs4 on the largest maps.(the one with a lot of strategic points) The more strategic points the largest the Axis advantage. but all maps have the same number of points. Solution : On the largest 6-8 maps remove 1 fuel production from all point. (It won't have any effect of the 1vs1 or 2v2 match.) Why: Game always finish the same way: Axis stand off with their supported AA-bases, then the heavy tanks supported with some shreks will kill everything, 1 shot all at-guns and kill all allied at-tanks like they were not there. first of all, you need to stop with the hyperbole if you want to have a real discussion. even IF what you just said was true (its not), removing 1 fuel point wont help anything. having only 1 fuel point would make the game extremely boring. right now, when a team camps a fuel point, you can focus on the other. your suggestion would make that impossible. whoever took the fuel first would just build defenses and camp, the other team would be forced to keep attacking a heavily fortified area if they dont want a significant fuel disadvantage. The american faction is fine in the beginning but is powerless in the end game. Jackson at_tanks dies always from 1 panzershreks squad as their mg cover will be obliterated by the tigers. Russian tanks (Su-85) who could do something are not enough mobile to go help their friends on those large maps. Only an all Russian team has some chance of winning and that's sad. (Even skilled players) again, hyperbole. you shouldnt be losing jacksons to schrecks. how are su85s able to do something, but jacksons arent? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 06:26 AM i think we both know that AT games wont show if ive played OKW. anything else? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 06:12 AM k... http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/viewBoard/0/steamid/76561197999260801 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: American player here, how is the Kubel weak?15 Aug 2014, 04:31 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2014, 00:40 AMtheblitz6794 Bollocks. I've never had this work for me. The shots always miss riflemen have .5 accuracy at max range. multiply that by kubels target size of 10 and you have a 500% chance to hit. you could even be suppressed at max range and still have a 125% chance to hit the kubel. i think its safe to say, your shots are not missing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance15 Aug 2014, 04:30 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2014, 23:50 PMArclyte For the last month now I've only been playing Ost/OKW in team games. Unless your teammates are too busy eating their crayons, you are guaranteed to get to lategame and roll the allies well i can see in 2v2s, youre on a 3 loss streak with a .545 win ratio. in 3v3s, you have a 5 win streak, but you just now got out of your 10 prelim matches. in 4v4s, your only team out of prelims has a .68 win ratio. either your teammates eat a lot of crayons or axis isnt quite as easy as youd like to make them sound. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance14 Aug 2014, 21:13 PM people already dont tech because it costs too much. you want to increase teching costs? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Request] - How to calculate time to pinned14 Aug 2014, 21:11 PM finally got around to writing up splash suppression in rows 42-51. the m2hb has the best splash suppression at about 20m or less. german mgs are better at longer ranges thanks to having better incremental accuracy. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic @ Gamescon 201414 Aug 2014, 02:58 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2014, 02:15 AMTaucer Oh look, they want more money... those bastards! how dare they work for money! In: Lobby