Profile of panzerjager2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 168

General Information


Thread: how we exactly counter sniper and guard spam combo 14 Aug 2013, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2013, 18:41 PMfriedchicken You know the funny thing about you is that all you do is whine about the same crap in every thread, up until reading your post i was actually interested in the discussion, then i hit your garbage suddenly i don't care. go cry somewhere else. oh look the whiny troll is back .... It won't be too long before your banned. Its funny how you keep trolling and abusing which other members have pointed out and still think anyone cares for your opinion. I pity you, living in mommas basement with no job, no gf and spend most of your timing flaming on a video game forum. Get a life kid, I know you look like your avatar but try it aint too hard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 arc14 Aug 2013, 08:06 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 22:24 PMR3beL Agree the arc and range of mg is pretty big. Add that to bunker building , 10% suppression bulletin and shitty conscript damage and it is pretty much ''op''. np if you want to reduce the arc, give MG42 the same setup and packup time as the maxim as well as the same DPS. I hope you guys realize the reason why MG42 has such a wide arc is to compensate for its long setup and pack time as well as its low dps. Also I will throw around a word a lot of soviet players love using when discussing the su85 ... FLANK. At least an MG42 cant warp speed reverse from flanking attacks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Game balanced without su8513 Aug 2013, 19:39 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 19:30 PMwayward516 As a Soviet player and someone who loves the game, I'm all for any change that will help the endgame evolve from its current PZIV/SU85 meta and let us see more tanks used After PZ4 nerf I dont see that much spam .... but you are right. Nerfing the SU85 warp speed reverse capability and a slight increase in cost would make it what it should be a very potent SUPPORTING tank destroyer which can maul tanks but needs to be supported well while being very vulnerable to flanking attacks. At the same time T34 needs its penetration upped to around 120 for better anti armor performance (it should still lose to a more expensive Pz4) and ram should be made a vet 1 ability. This would make the game much more interesting by : a)Reducing the current SU85 spam b)More cool tank battles at close ranges c)More usage of StuG's and PaK40's d)force the soviet player to think before pressing the ram button on anything from an opel blitz to an elephant. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Game balanced without su8513 Aug 2013, 19:26 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 19:18 PMUGBEAR PZIV is balanced without SU-85, is that OP wants to say? panzer 4 got nerfed in case you didnt realize ... it can hardly hit infantry with its horrid accuracy now. Its still a decent anti tank platform but next to useless against inf. Su85 oth is still the same ... but good news for balance minded folks and bad news for soviet only whiners su85 will be defintely given a nerf in the next patch. The days of spamming them and using a "tank destroyer" to spearhead assaults without support are over. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SU-85; The Thread13 Aug 2013, 19:20 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 19:13 PMsevenfour SU85 is fine as it is. Dr.Octogon and StephennJF said it very well. The problem is german players still go for Panzer IV(s) even when they know SU85 is coming or even when it is on the field already. That is just plain bad countering! (Even though PIV can possibly outmaneuver SU85 because of its slow rotating speed, but still, SU85 is SUPPOSED to counter medium armor.) If you keep spamming a medium tank every game, any decent player will just build apropriate counter unit every game. So surprising and outrageous right? How dare they even do that! SU85 is absolutely god awful against infantry. If you see SU85 and go for ifantry instead, the russian player just wasted huge amount of resources on tier 4 building and SU85(s) that won`t do anything. Plus Panzergrenadiers with schreks absolutely tear apart SU85s (and many other units...). Then there is smoke to block its line of sight etc. but that is secondary. Someone told me: "Yeah, but my infantry is getting killed by the sniper(s)." Well that may be the case, but then the question is not what to do about the SU85 but what to do about the sniper(s). And in this case I am inclined to agree with ppl who say snipers - on both sides - in general are OP (a unit that can insta-kill any infantry, has long range and cloak on friggin tier 1?? - I wouldn`t mind snipers being general-specific call in units with 4 or 5 command points requirement for example, but that`s OT). Anyway, seems like german is the new protoss - just qq-ing about how everything is OP and their faction so terribly underpowered in comparison. Are you that daft .... panzer gren squads are SLOW SU85 can REVERSE FASTER THAN ANY GERMAN TANKS FORWARD SPEED and you think they wouldnt simple reverse outta the way and send in shocks/maxims/conscripts/snipers to force you to retreat those shrek squads ? Finally ... snipers on BOTH sides op? LOL do you even play germans ... do you know how ridiculously fragile the one man German sniper is ? The Russian 2 man sniper can counter snipe the German one all day long due to the 2 man advantage. Also Russians have 6 man squads which means the German sniper is even less effective. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Game balanced without su8513 Aug 2013, 16:51 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 16:45 PMfriedchicken Man every time i see your name in a thread you're always crying about the SU-85, can you please explain to me how this tank is an "exploit".. learn to flank properly stfu ... mods can we ban this troll already In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Lack of Anti-tanks Stormtroops call-in 13 Aug 2013, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 15:15 PMHypnotoad Ostruppen? Cannon fodder and useless .... some doctrinal infantry similar to the effectiveness and versatility of soviet shocks and guards for Germans would really be nice. Knights cross holders anyone ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KV-8; The Thread13 Aug 2013, 12:11 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 11:30 AMBlovski I'm OK with the KV-8's damage, given it's a late-game doctrinal, largely anti-infantry tank. The cost is probably too low for the effectiveness, given that trading one for a P-IV or Ostwind or even a StuG isn't a terrible deal. I've been using them quite a lot in a T2-T3 build (i.e. with no SU-85s) and they're pretty solid within that. I'd like the AI to stay the same, since it needs to be a step above Soviet tier 3 (especially given it's almost always hovering in faust range) but I think a cost increase is in order. Lets have a small comparison .... the ostheer's rival to the KV8 is the brummbar which costs 180 fuel and a load of manpower more. It also has less armor and has far less killing capacity against inf than the kv8. KV8 needs a definite fuel increase so it cant be spammed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85; The Thread13 Aug 2013, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2013, 23:32 PMfriedchicken you know what they say birds of a feather whine together, Fly* You know what they say .... trolls of a feather spam together. Isn't it past your bed time chicken troll ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85; The Thread13 Aug 2013, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2013, 07:58 AMMarcus2389 Don't worry, we already have the solution to fix the SU-85, and yes it would affect its speed/acceleration to add some risk when you position it and remove the so-strong chasing capability of the tank. Thanks for the update .... that is really great news. Its warp speed reverse was one of the main reasons why it was so op. At least now flanking it would be rewarded unlike earlier where all you had to do was mash the R button and reverse away faster than any German tank's forward speed. In: COH2 Balance