Profile of Cardboard Tank

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 978

General Information


Thread: Comming update: IS-2 and ISU-152 will be buffed29 Mar 2014, 00:34 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2014, 00:30 AMKronosaur0s Buff to ISU152 OMFG So the ISU will with increased anti armor performance be an Elefant with better anti infantry capabilities and more mobility? Why would I build an Elefant? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Comming update: IS-2 and ISU-152 will be buffed29 Mar 2014, 00:19 AM Maybe the Panther can finally get 60 range finally with buffed Soviet heavies. Considering that it sounds like they are planning to also nerf its vet 2, I´m not looking forward to this. It´s dumb already that so many shots bounce of KVs. Now the German players have to pay more fuel to get weaker Panthers, no thanks. - Panzer IV it is. I wonder what will happen to StuG and Panzer IV which get 2 and 3 shot killed by IS-2s already. As I see it the faction which should have the weaker tanks will rule supreme. pffff. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Standalone America + Germany DLC28 Mar 2014, 19:14 PM The USA + Soviets in one team better not happen. That´s totally fucking the historic content of the game. Yeah, there are some people who like that, but there are a lot of people who don´t. Even though it´s a game, it´s intention is to set you at a certain front and have some kind of immersion. But Immersion is of course totally irrelevant for a historic game.You know what? If that happens, introduce Dr. Friedhelm Grubers special Nazi Zombie army. Comes with Zombies, Maus tanks and other nifty experiments. Oh, it can fight versus Russians and USA. But the best thing is Dr. Gruber was totally out of control, so you can use him versus the Germans also! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Standalone America + Germany DLC28 Mar 2014, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:35 PMmorten1 coh2 will be stupid if USA and Russia fight together Yeah, I wouldn´t mind if it was possible in some custom game. But please don´t match USA and Sovs in ranked games in one team. That would look so silly. Immersion would be totally gone. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: American Speculation Thread 28 Mar 2014, 12:50 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 12:42 PMMarcoRossolini Knowing Relic the Sherman will probably be superior in all aspects to the T-34, despite being very similar in performance and some cases the T-34 being superior. Actually the Sherman was better. Both were easy to maintain and produce. The M4 we see on the screen M4A3 also didn´t catch fire that easily as it had wet storage. The crew comfort and accuracy of the M4 were also better. The M4 had gyro stabilizers which allowed it to somewhat accurately fire on the move. Plus the 75mm armed Sherman had a better HE shell than the T-34/76. I just hope the M4 doesn´t get the ram ability. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: American Speculation Thread 28 Mar 2014, 12:40 PM Could any of you guys take a realistic approach on it? 1. "Heavy cav. here!" - Might be English, but everybody in this game has English voice-lines. It is likely, that the line was jsut used, because we know it from Coh1. Might be that it also appears on the new Shermans (as it´s fairly neutral and not a restriction to Americans). 2. The wreckage of the Sherman is on Eastern front maps. "Steppes" map has a M4 wreck. It can be assumed that the Sherman will be available on those Eastern front maps. 3. Russians already have two lend-lease vehicles. Why not a tank? 4. I doubt relic will suddenly jump to a different front, if they didn´t even finish the Eastern front theater properly. There´s so much stuff to be included (like lend lease commanders). Maybe in the far future they could use the M4 skin again, but I doubt Americans will be included now. 5. I think we all have seen what the procedure was in the last months. Inclusion of new commanders for money. ---> A new Russian Commander with American equipment it is. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet28 Mar 2014, 11:54 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 03:15 AMferrozoica All these complaints of Cons/early game units are null in my opinion... What is (and mostly always has) been the problem is that Soviets have no late game all-rounder, apart from the IS-2. That´s actually my thought also. The Russians have to decide between T3 and T4 - now this issue has been magnified by the increased fuel cost on both buildings. The decision has to be made between mobility and anti infantry capabilities (T-34, T-70, Halftrack) and more static anti tank and artillery capabilities (Su-76, Su-85, Katjuscha). But if you made the wrong choice in choosing a tier, you are in the biggest trouble. You will lack either the AI and mobility or the AT and artillery. This is even hard to compensate with a doctrine. Thus I think the Russians should get easier access to all of their tiers. I would actually prefer that those buildings were dirt cheap but the vehicles would have to be researched. This way I could have a T-34 and a Su-85 on the field the same time. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet27 Mar 2014, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2014, 17:55 PMKronosaur0s Ok, done. Next? Replace Panther with Panzer 38t. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet27 Mar 2014, 16:40 PM Well ,not person, but the way you are trying to undermine my credibility here is just pathetic. You just assume I´m a German fanboy, because I have a different opinion. This way you don´t have to deal with any argument. And that´s weak. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: L2P thread of post-patched Soviet27 Mar 2014, 16:28 PM The fact that you are trying to argue about my person, shows me you are out of arguments. Also I´m not falling for that manipulative way of yours. As soon as my stats show some percentage more of German games I´m a "fanboy". there are actually people who don´t a gree with you out there, name calling won´t help you. Again, try to bring some real arguments. In: COH2 Gameplay