Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: Wehrmacht T44 Jan 2016, 01:20 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2016, 00:41 AMIntelligence209 I see people saying that tier 3 is just fine, tier 4 is a luxury. That tier 3 your able to win games. Then I see how your supposed to go panzerwerfer to counter blobbs. Since almost every game there is blobbing. Especially USF. So basically from what I see. Is i have to go the obvious tier 1. Then of course tier 2 for AT guns since there is a fast light tank on the field 9/10 times. Then tier 3 because we have the best tier 3 in the game. But how am I supposed to counter blobbs again? With the joke ostwind? Oh and Cromwell exceeds the p4. Self spotting. Good A.I. and AT capabilities. The smoke round it can fire blinding AT guns. Fast as hell. And i see them being built even in the late game. P4 doesn't need a buff btw.. Because there are more ways to counter blobs then just the panzerwherfer. good play Mgs and mortars work just fine, and you can always choose a faction with artillery too. Once again USF and UKF are much worse in this case and they make do. Ostheer can too. In: Lobby
Thread: Allied 1v1 Dominace4 Jan 2016, 00:02 AM You mean that allied dominance that doesn't even exist. Also you misspelled the title. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht T43 Jan 2016, 23:58 PM The only thing that could be improved, is the amount of resources it takes to go to T3 then T4, but T3 is just as good if not better then what every other faction gets at that time and is plenty to get you through the game by itself. T4 is a luxery advanced tier that isn't always necessary. Sure, not having access to rocket arty can be a weakness, but all factions need to pay extra if they want access to all their stuff. Soviets and USF might not even have access to their AT guns depending on what teching choices they make. USF and UKF don't even have access to heavy arty units at all unless they compensate with a commander and they make due just fine. A straight reduction to T4 would cause rushing it to be too powerful, but if they can find a way to lower the resource cost through T3, I think that would be good. Maybe a alternate T4 battle phase in T3 with a bit a fuel shaved off. In: Lobby
Thread: Hand Held AT and Suppression 3 Jan 2016, 10:39 AM The current mechanic is fine. The suppression will make whatever first shots they take really inaccurate, and the reload is increased so much that they won't get a second shot off for a long time. Seems pretty fair to me. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Assault Guns vs Fortifications2 Jan 2016, 08:54 AM 1)Do fortifications exist in COH2? Yes 2)Do Assault Guns exist in COH2? Yes 3)Is the part of design intent of assault Guns to destroy buildings and fortifications? In real life, Yes In game, No. They are anti-infantry vehicles that use high explosive shells. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: grenadiers1 Jan 2016, 23:20 PM Why? Ostheer has the best 1v1 stats. Why fuck with something that's working just fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: List Of Dubious Veterancy Bonuses31 Dec 2015, 18:30 PM How could you miss pack howi's vet 2. Because nothings better then only receiving stat buffs for your crappy, 3 round, innacurate barrage, right. At least now it gets extra pen. So much better then normal stat buffs . In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Relic][3v3+] Some Love When?29 Dec 2015, 07:23 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Dec 2015, 03:40 AMNapalm Caches aren't the only thing that needs to be looked at. - Map design, must move away from narrow channels Honestly less of a problem then people make it out to be. Lots of 3v3+ maps have just about as much room to manuever as any 2v2. They'll never be 1v1 spacious because there isn't really enough space to make that work. Though maps could definetly benifit from being more "wide" and less "long". - Volks with Shreks Given the recent announcement, It's pretty obvious they won't be doing anything about this for months. so there really isn't much we can accomplish here for now. - Superior Axis armor* Only problems are the heavy TDs. Definitely need to be more vulnerable to counters, but caches definitely make them easier to get then they should be. - Halo bonus units They need to only effect the players that use them. Simple as that. Most of these things wouldn't really effect 1v1 in the slightest. I have no idea why some people always make fun of 3v3+ balance issues, when fixing them probably wont effect 1v1 in the slightest. In: Lobby
Thread: British Base Howi's29 Dec 2015, 03:50 AM In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Relic][3v3+] Some Love When?28 Dec 2015, 23:05 PM Caches. Main problem of all teamgames. Maps, scaling, and all that other bullshit every other poster is talking about is miniscule when you consider the effects of caches. Teamgames will never be balanced as long as players are receiving constant resource increases from a single players small investment. In: Lobby