Profile of Omega_Warrior

Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2013, 16:08 PMCrells

vet idea for ram.. it just doesnt sit well with me, why would you disable your most powerfull tank?? just make it stun both tanks with no lasting effect or just frikken remove it and give them an overdrive vet ability and buff acordingly.

Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2013, 00:19 AMThe Dave

My argument isn't about what to do in a blizzard. I know how to reinforce from a halftrack, thx. My argument is that the blizzard just makes the match insufferably boring and frustrating to play through. It's actually worse in team games especially playing against Soviets who camp with longer range heavy armor and mgs/120 mm mortar. Perhaps this could be alleviated if maps like Rhzev weren't just poorly designed layout wise in general. I just think the gameplay would be more fluid without 10 blizzards that stall for various lengths of time over a 35 minute time period.

Jump back to quoted post26 Jul 2013, 17:47 PMS0_L337_1T_HURTS

Issue of RAM cost aside; maybe the answer is the RAM mechanic itself. Some say RAM is too extreme, I think at the very least it could be made morel dynamic.

I think two things for certain: RAM should always disable the gun and engine of the ramming tank 100% of the time. That's the physical cost of RAM which should always remain regardless of anything else.

But maybe there should be a dice roll as to whether or not, at least on the larger tanks like Panther, Elephant, Brummbar, and Tiger, maybe these tanks should have slightly more protection from RAM or at lest make RAM more of a dice roll for these units specifically. There should be a diceroll that either the maingun is damaged or the engine is damaged but not both. I don't know. Just ideas...

But having an Elephant, the most expensive unit in the game, insta-disabled by RAM doesn't feel right to anyone.