Profile of Ginnungagap

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 324 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: SAGE BALANCE 1v1 19 Apr 2014, 13:59 PM T1: Grens - fix rifle nade What fix? Like halving the range once suppressed? T4: Panther - increase AI capability of Panther to MATCH that of P4. You unknowingly opened the gates of hell by even suggesting that. The 4v4 demons will eat your soul. T0: Cons - change weapon profile to beat grens at mid/short range, lose at long range. That's already the case, you should have played the game long enough to know that. It's more a problem with getting in optimal range without casualties and 4-men squads sticking better to cover. Your other suggestions basically lead to anti-everything-penal-in-M3 spam that can only be dealt with by a Pak40 or Tanks. The uneven relationship between tank call-ins and especially soviet T3 was not addressed at all? Is this a troll post? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thinking on buying first tablet need help18 Apr 2014, 02:46 AM Hi, i'm using an Experia Z tablet for streams, movies and surfing. Looks nice and runs smooth, would recommend checking it out. The Z2 allows microSD, if 32GB is not enough, but it's a bit more on the expensive side. In: Hardware and Tech
Thread: Hello from Japan!17 Apr 2014, 00:16 AM Welcome In: New Members
Thread: Tiger vs KV-812 Apr 2014, 17:25 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2014, 04:09 AMJinseual While the Stug was pursuing it was firing at the KV8s rear the whole time, three times have the rounds bounced off, the KV8s rear. The KV8 escaped to safety while the Stug was forced to retreat. Stug penetration is 140 versus 120 rear armor of the KV8. Correct me if i'm wrong, but i think your scenario is technically impossible. Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2014, 17:00 PMBootleg Usher One change I would like to see is substantially reduced damage to retreating units. Agreed. But since Relic apparently is unable to change the flame weapon profile on retreating units, slowing the KV8s speed down a little bit seems like the next reasonable step. KV8 still feels a little bit cheap at what it does. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Concepts of soviets is wrong that why they so boring10 Apr 2014, 14:15 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2014, 04:15 AMwongtp i know my shit and i hope you respect that. You know nothing Jon Snow. Listen to wooof and leave the thinking to the horses, they have the bigger heads. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You know you play too much COH2 When..9 Apr 2014, 00:27 AM ...your name is SageOfTheSix. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance forum with rank prequisite7 Apr 2014, 17:59 PM Make it for the top 20 only you filthy animal. In: Site Feedback
Thread: Shreked PGrens... Balanced or no?6 Apr 2014, 17:00 PM I believe in 1v1 PGrens with schrecks are fine. They are a high-cost, high-efficiency unit, and that's alright on a small scale. In 2v2+ their value especially in the late game increases, because the munitions cost is easily affordable. Massed PGrens can easily attack move multiple soviet tanks except IS2, ISU152 and KV8. All other soviet tanks rely heavily on rng to do damage, as mentioned before. The scatter change on move (which i personally like) and negligible range difference prevents effective kiting with tanks. That's also when you notice the lack of any serious soviet infantry AT. (I would be in favor for a bazooka upgrade for engineers once T3/T4 is up) To specifically address the "massed PG problem": Decreasing the penetration and range slightly, while also decreasing the munitions cost a little bit could give them a more reasonable performance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The One That Prevents COH2 from Being Fantastic6 Apr 2014, 05:00 AM Mmmmmh... sips whisky ...classic HS King mhmmm mhmmm. I quite enjoy the regularity and enthusiasm. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The current state of assault guns1 Apr 2014, 23:06 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2014, 19:22 PM5trategos ImperialDane must not know about this thread. Pssssst, keep it low profile! In: COH2 Balance