Profile of Jinseual

yea commanders are too expensive because when you think about it. if new content keeps and you keep buying them, you might spend over $200 on a single game, especially on something that was supposed to be free in the first place. if relic wants to make money through dlcs than commanders are not the way to go. new missions and skins are the best options to make money with not commanders!

oh do i miss the days of vcoh pgrens where you can have either not both. even with my idea, it would make them less effective AT and with the nerfed vet 2 they should be easier to kill.

i see about 50 pct chance of pios winning since they don't lose accuracy on the move they can walk up to the engineers while shooting it really depends on whether or not the engineers have cover.

no t34s penetration is not fine at all, ram should NOT be an ability that soviet players have to rely on. it should be a last resort ability. the t34 is supposed to be a good all round tank but not excel in either AI or AT roles so it should have decent AT capabilities.

the panther is supposed to be the tank that's almost invincible on the front but really vulnerable on the rear like real life, it should not bounce of t34 rounds at all.

the soviets should not have to only rely on AT guns and su85s. the lack of different kind of AT units just makes the game dull if players have to constantly use hard counters. i buy this game for world war 2 where there are many different ways to handle a situation which rely on skill of the player and not a rock, paper scissors game.

i want this game to be changed from "he got tanks ok i spam su85s and guards because everything else is sucks" too "ok he have tanks i can either make enough t34s to overwhelm him or i could go for the hard counters like su85s"

just look at the main concepts of the two factions. the german faction has tanks that are either really good against infantry or really good against tanks. while the soviet faction has tanks that are good at doing both but not excel in either roles.

also keep in mind that soviet buildings are really expensive so in a tight game he is either going to stick with t3 or t4 because it's fairly uneconomical to go for both. it's currently like t3 is good in the short run when the opponent forget to make his AT while t4 is good in the long run since there really is no reason to go t3.

engineers are too expensive, currently they are an even match with pioneers but a lot more expensive. the only real advantage are the mines but the mines just need a price increase.

panzergrenadiers should only get a 1 panzershreck upgrade for 75 munitions, but each panzershreck have to do 160 damage and faster reload times. panzergrenadiers kill tanks too quickly, while the soviets don't have an equivalent.

veterancy is OP. 55 damage reduction makes a huge difference it might as well be veterancy 3. vet 2 infantry and tanks takes 2x as many shots to kill, if you want to encourage unit preservation this is not the way to do it. su85 does 160 damage and t34s does 120 damage while the panzerIV has 650 hp. su85 takes 4 shots to kill a panzerIV while a t34 takes 7 shots. with veterancy 2 it takes su85 9 shots to kill a panzerIV while a t34 takes more than 11 ( 11 shots at the rear to kill a panzerIV how crazy is that? ) 25 pct damage reduction is the perfect number 6 shots for a su85 to kill a panzer IV and 8 shots for the t34 seems a lot more reasonable.

t34s have too low penetration. im tired of seeing t34 rounds bouncing off the rear of panthers and that a panzer IV can take on two t34s from the front ( the t34s should not have to rely on flanking all the time the price difference is not the same as m18s and panthers) t34 rounds even bounce of ostwinds! penetration should be set to 110 the same goes for su76.

tigers reload time should be set to 6.5 seconds and have penetration increased to 170. the tiger is supposed to be a slow but dangerous threat. tigers shooting fast and having rounds bounce of an su85 is the most ridiculous scene to see.

ive asked for these changes before but i'm asking again just because ITS NEEDED. i hold off other suggestions for now because of the size of this post.

ok it can die just as easily as the russian howitzer yet fires faster with long barrage times, and shorter cooldowns.

of course the thing would not be protected by other tanks which can destroy a t34 way before the t34 can fire off its second shot. and guards ..... if a t34 takes more than 3 shots to kill a 105 than i doubt the guards can kill any faster. katyusha? is there no reason to go t3 anymore?

the 105 seem to have a lot more advantages than the 155 because the 155s only advantage it seems is that it can do more damage and the range doesn't seem a lot bigger than the 105.

still twelve rounds in one barrage is still to much.

you cant balance off 4v4s for the millionth time. They would have to implement cost scaling based on the number of players in a match: either resources would decrease, or costs increase proportionately if that is your issue.

I dont play large team games specifically because its just specialist unit spam (snipers, mg42s, su85s, etc) en bulk

even in 1v1s it's still imbalanced. i already explain what the tank should be like in 1v1s in my first post. the player has to save fuel at the risk of being overrun to early by tanks. risk and rewards and the current price doesn't allow that. did you read my last sentence from my previous post?

"600 mp and 130 fuel panthers did not improve 1v1s but imbalanced 4v4s! comon relic!"

so it doesn't help you to bring up 1v1s because it doesn't help 1v1s and just worsens 4v4s. get it?