Profile of Pip

Coh1 is an inferior game that no one plays anymore. Wehrmacht is the correct name of the faction.

Plenty of people still play CoH1, though I personally much prefer CoH2. Check Steamcharts if you don't believe me. CoH2 certainly has a higher playerbase, but CoH1 is hardly a ghost town.

There's no reason to be more confusing than you need to be. Ostheer is a fine term.

Luftwaffe Ground Forces
Give us vCoH luftwaffe ground forces, god dammit
Heavy fortifications has no place in this commander.

Suggestions:
1) Idk, maybe give volks ability to turn them into an engi unit? Like give them mine-sweeper upgrade, they will get 1\2 mine sweepers (to delete their combat power), but in return they will be able to sweep\repair\lay mines and combine it with Heavy fortifications.


Over-all meh abilities:
1) Airborne Assault - reinforcing fallshims is nice, but aside from that for 200 muni this ability is very weak.
2) Zeroing Artillery very expensive and most importanly very hard to use effectively.

It really is a shame we can't at least retexture models. Blue Volks (or even Ostruppen models I guess) would be perfectly usable as "Luftwaffe Ground Force" infantry models. Providing OKW with a doctrinal Engineer/utility combat unit would be pretty useful.

I've always said "the only thing coh2 needs is more inconsistency that isn't translated at all to the player" so. Glad people have finally started listening. I think we should take it a step further and have other commander abilities not work as described for no apparent reason to the player, I'm thinking the okw call in ostwind shouldn't be able to engage aircraft in certain maps, luftwaffe supply drop should only work in certain muni pints or fuel points (maybe alternating?) usf smoke and sprint should in certain sectors instead of sprint apply a speed debuff and in other sectors there should be no smoke. These are suggestions of course and all that really matters is that it's inconsistently applied and in no way at all communicated to the player UNLESS they get out of the game and create an account on a 3rd party website and ask a question as to its status. This will make the game much better and definitely not give the impression of yet more buggy features and poor quality control.

To be fair, I would expect this is at least communicated in-game, as the affected buildings will visibly not be in your territory.

Quoting myself from the upcoming commander update - wishes thread:





edit: hulled down panthers actually don't have longer range than elephant, but slightly longer than 60, allied TD range.

This is a really good idea and I am not biased at all. :^)

I totally agree with what you said above, but cmon, bulat clearly wrote this

"The real sad thing about all of this is that coh2 is such a small community and yet some top players are being banned in that way."

So how can your response then be:
I don't think "Well, the community is too small to ban cheaters" is much of a defence, is it?"

"In that way" is not the part of the post I was taking issue with, it was the follow-on that was talking about Seeking being a "good player", and that this would then warrant a reduction in the length of a ban, or that the fact there aren't many "good players" should mean that the community can't really afford to ban people.

"I mean there are not that many players who play on such level. BTW seeking played vs isildur with webcam in finals, so he is top player for sure. How many people here can do 3-2 series vs isildur?" just seems to be some sort of appeal to emotion, rather than a meaningful argument. None of it matters.

Also: "Learn alphabet" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means in English, I assume it was a direct translation from Slovenian. I presume you meant "Learn to Read", though assuming I can't read because I'm interpreting a post differently to you is a little childish.

Seeking didn't cheat, even AE himself said that there are not enough evidence.

My point is that the whole story is terrible. And one of the top players got banned in such absurd way.

The conclusion isnt that "Seeking didn't cheat", it is currently "We're not sure the evidence is conclusive enough". There's an important distinction there, and it's all still being discussed, Stormjager's recent post being an example of that.

I agree that this "investigation" isnt exactly the cleanest operation going, but there doesn't seem to have been unjust action taken by A_E et al.