Profile of Pip

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1594

General Information


Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:17 PMKatitof I don't know. They seem to have a lot more "engineer" abilities then "assault" ones on their grid. We already have assault pioneers in game. Its OKW starting unit. It would be inconsistent to have 2 completely different units with the same name. "Assault" engineers clearly don't need five men then, if they're primarily being built to provide engineering services. Other engineer units don't arrive with five men by default, so it's pretty inconsistent. No, those are called "Sturmpioneers". "Angriff" is "Assault", "Sturm" is "Storm". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:16 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:14 PMT.R. Stormjäger Read that again, but very very slowly. Are they or are they not assault infantry? They are also "Engineers", but they are primarily assault infantry. Again, if we called "Assault Grenadiers" "Assault Pioneers" would that solve the issue of them being able to build Bunkers? My argument is that this "Consistency" statement is unfounded. If there's a balance issue derived from Assgrens being able to build Bunkers then sure, make that argument. "Consistency" is not a balance argument. This is like people insisting the STUG needs to be 60 range, to be "consistent" with allied TDs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:11 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:07 PMKatitof No, I'm super cereal here. They are engineers, just like spios. Vippers posts lack consistency and arguments. Please stop projecting REs are the US engineer unit. Assault Engineers are an assault unit that can also act as an engineer unit. Strangely, Spios can't build bunkers anyway. "Inconsistent" is an argument you only get to use when you apply it universally, not just to an unit you dislike for some reason. Make a real argument if you want bunkers removing from Assault Grenadiers, rather than this stupid "Consistency" thing you're only applying selectively. Feel free to point out when I call for unnecessarily nerfing units for unqualified reasons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 15:01 PMKatitof We can't, it would be inconsistent with sturmpioneers, sturm means assault in german. Look, katitof, just admit you're not actually arguing from a logical basis here and be done with it. This is very childish. Assault Engineers are an assault squad that can also build fighting positions. This contradicts your earlier assertion that assault squads "cannot build bunkers". See Vipper's post for why this "consistency" argument holds no water. You have the same hardon for unnecessarily, and pointlessly nerfing axis units as you accuse others of doing for allied ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 15:00 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:55 PMKatitof We can't. They are engineers. Its in the name. Engineers are supposed to build these things. Its consistent. Read their name very carefully and slowly, as many times as you need, no rush. Just change the name of Assgrens to Assault Pioneers then, then there's no problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 14:52 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:48 PMKatitof Then we need to remove it from grens for consistency too. I suppose we need to remove Fighting Positions from Assault Engineers, too, then? Even if we were to take your "Consistency" argument at face value... it isnt even the case that "all other assault infantry can't build bunkers", as AssEngies do. They are assault infantry, too, don't try and pretend they aren't. EDIT: And their mines, demo charges, wire-cutting, caches, and repair abilities, of course. For "Consistency". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 14:46 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:44 PMKatitof Consistency. Other assault infantry can't build them. Other assault infantry's mainline counterparts can't either. This isnt a change that needs implementing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Assault Grens early game OP - balance suggestion7 Jan 2021, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jan 2021, 14:41 PMTaksin02 remove bunker from Assgren. Why? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 18:45 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 18:40 PMLetzte Bataillon Do you mean the doctrinal Stug III G with the exploding shells? I agree it is one of the doctrinal units that feel half-finished, like the PzIV Command Tank. Otherwise, the standard Stug III has great value and can punch above its weight. Indeed, as small position adjustments are often needed, the Elefant's scope isn't 100% reliable and its better to keep an actual recon vehicle close by. It's still a nice extra feature to have, of course. STUG E, not STUG G, the G is the nondoctrinal AT version. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion6 Jan 2021, 17:59 PM Im surprised commenting that "I like the Jagdpanzer a lot, even if it seems to have a lot of scatter" caused a page worth of argumentation. In: COH2 Balance