Profile of pvtgooner

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 359

General Information


Thread: Infantry Section - No Abilities11 Sep 2019, 18:32 PM Happened to a ranger squad one time but then a skill plane landed on top of them and it fixed it lol In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: 13-minute T34/8510 Sep 2019, 22:24 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 22:22 PMShadowLinkX37 Should be. Lend lease air drop and fuel caches can both speed up the arrival time of armor. It's strong for 13 minutes, but when last patch dropped people were getting 15 minute tigers. So a 13 minute 34/85 isn't too far fetched. I think he’s putting a troll spin on the previous patches controversy, the 13 minute tiger In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind Overbuffed?10 Sep 2019, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 21:46 PMachpawel 1. Ostwind has generally weak armour for tier 3. Contary to centaur it bounces almost nothing. Looking at all AT options allies have it has to be microed really skilfully to avoid AT fire. Such skills should be rewarded by game mechanics and luckily they are. 2. Skipping tiers is risky for ost so it should be used by the allied player, if it is not then they would lose whether there is ostwind or not. Ostwind is blamed for losing but the blame should often be put on less skillful play by the allied player. 3. Actually dealing the same dmg by ostwind and centaur already favours allis as they have larger squads. To make it even one coukd say ostwind should deal more damage. 4. Armour on centaur is really strong and bounces shells quite often. Those who say it doesn't are simply wrong. 5. The speed of ostwind is not as great as some people seem to believe. I don't understand the whole argumentation saying that it can escape so quickly from trouble. Not much difference to most other tanks, especially Jackson. Generally from my perapective ostwind is a relatively fragile tier 3 AI vehicle. It's imact on allies is similar to t70 on ost but it comes later when there should be more at options on the field. If allies invested all munitions and manpower into AI they will be in trouble. If they placed some mines and/or bought some bazookas and/or at gun and can use it/them ostwind will be dead quickly. But that seems to be the problem. Some allied players prefer blobbing infantry with AI weapons and get surprised. At this point, it seems the thread generally agrees Parsons is strong but balanced and I shouldn’t have been so confident in a premium AT LV like the Stuart without other AT sources. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht September patch discussion10 Sep 2019, 18:38 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 16:47 PMdistrofio I think CE are better 'baseline' (if you wanted to say benchmark) since everyone knows that both pios are used aggressively. If you can get on top of them can be considered a missplay of the defending side, therefore by no means a good argument to prove a units strenght. Not always, sight blockers exist and you'd probably know this if you had automatch ranks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion10 Sep 2019, 18:35 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 17:10 PMSander93 https://www.reddit.com/user/Sandert93/ Would you mind showing me in which posts exactly I "have sworn up and down every pro player that has tested the patch has said USF is OP." ? Because funnily enough, I can't find myself saying anything like that at all. Yeah Stug is right(wtf did I just say that), it was Andy's comment in the shoutbox after 1.2 or 1.1 preview was announced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track10 Sep 2019, 18:25 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 14:47 PMJilet Who said I am blobbing ? Dude... Brace ability is what makes brit emplacements cancer nothing else. If I am putting on a 10 second or less arti barrage it is completely safe. Note that many precision barrages are less than 10 seconds. If all you use to destroy an emplacement are IDF barrages, I think I found your problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Message to the Community 10 Sep 2019, 18:21 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 17:06 PMblvckdream Least convincing explanation I have ever heard. "not accurate on the amount of games played and ranks" LMAO LOL "Thats by no means my player card" in the same sentence "at least its not accurate on the amount of games played and the ranks" want to try that one again? Is it not your playercard or is it your playercard but none of the information on it is right In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht September patch discussion10 Sep 2019, 16:08 PM pios are fine and honestly the unit I would use as a baseline to balance all other engineers around. I dont know why people say DPS is a problem, theyll actually shred vet0 units if you can get on top of them. sight is welcome all game long and they have a serviceable flamer upgrade too. I wish RETs were more like pios 3: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Message to the Community 10 Sep 2019, 13:35 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 20:37 PMdistrofio You should be heading that list though shoutbox led me to believe this is your playercard Distrofio, why are you even in this thread? http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198067331839/standings In: Lobby
Thread: Message to the Community 9 Sep 2019, 21:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 21:47 PMmurky depths I like "absolute pinecone" as an insult. Do you mind if I steal it and claim it as my own? Also, when you do, please make it so that USF medics once out of the ambulance can upgrade weapons + get veterancy. Thanks bud. I stole it so you can too! And yes I will, right after I copy and paste IRHT into USF T0 In: Lobby