Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost23 Jul 2016, 09:04 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2016, 08:52 AMCarlos Danger I dunno, in my experience both the Jackson and Firefly have a bigger impact on the battlefield than the SU-85 and Jagdpanzer. The turrets help, for a start, and the 200 damage is huge. the jagdpanzer4 counter the jackson and firefly. The jagdpanzer will win any slug fight against the western TD, and neither TD are are good at flanking despite their turrets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost23 Jul 2016, 07:44 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2016, 03:46 AMCarlos Danger Afaik 12 is fine considering it's a pretty specialized unit. StuG-III should be 10 population plus get a health buff from 560 to 640 imo. Jagdpanzer IV could also drop from 14 to 12. Again, fee ls appropriate considering I think its value is pretty comparable to Panzer IV. jackson, firefly, and the jagdpanzer are all 14 pop. If you're going to lower the pop on the jagdpanzer4 you need to lower the pop on the jackson and firefly as well. Jump back to quoted post22 Jul 2016, 22:10 PMZyllen I dont agree with you firesparks . the su85 didnt get buffed its role got changed from a medium tank hunter to a heavy tank hunter. its buffed penetration is very useful against heavies but the nerf to rof makes it less suitable against medium tanks. in fact a su85 vs a stug and their is a good chance the stug will win if the they are at 50 range when the fight begins the su-85 is still awesome against medium tanks. Infact, the penetration buff on the su-85 give it 100% penetration against the OKW panzer 4. The drastic increased in accuracy also affect its effectiveness against pretty much everything. old su-85 have 55% accuracy against panzer. The new su-85 have 88% accuracy against panzer4, that's a huge difference. The su-85 can also chase down fleeing tanks more easily, since its accuracy is still 44% on the movie. The boost in maneuverability for the su-85 also make it hard to flanker as well. and the su-85 out range the stug to begin with, with a focus sight ability as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What does 'flame damage normalized' actually mean?20 Jul 2016, 23:19 PM I don't think the croc 's main flame thrower needs a buff, even after you remove the secondary flamer. the 75mm main is still there. It's significantly weaker than the cromwell's gun but still okay against infantry. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance20 Jul 2016, 04:12 AM I would actually nerf the Leig's autofire range in exchange for a smoke ability and a stronger barrage ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What does 'flame damage normalized' actually mean?19 Jul 2016, 22:19 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 22:13 PMKatitof Still, there is no excuse to not be prepared for 13CP slow, AI only 230 fuel tank. even with dedicated purpose tank, there's still a limit to how powerful something should be. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What does 'flame damage normalized' actually mean?19 Jul 2016, 22:04 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 21:46 PMKatitof They were also used vs ost. Shreck blobs are no excuse here, sorry. They both had a fair share of nerfs. Just don't use infantry against them and make sure you have armor by 8/13CP, which isn't that hard to do. the fact that the croc fight the 4 men ost is all the more fact to nerf the croc In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What does 'flame damage normalized' actually mean?19 Jul 2016, 21:38 PM I think the croc and kv-8 are strong as they are currently because they had to fight schreck blob. Now that the schreck blob is gone, the croc need a nerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What does 'flame damage normalized' actually mean?19 Jul 2016, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 18:16 PMferwiner Hetzer should have the stats of KV-8 on its flamer. Problem solved. I actually think the flamer on the hetzer is fine. It's the Kv-8 and croc over performing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance19 Jul 2016, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 16:41 PMBrassatko And what's the significant difference between a regular mortar (with smoke) and the isg changes that miragefla is suggestig? the ISG fire in a semi-low arc. Assaulting the gun piece can be dangerous because it travel in an almost direct arc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance19 Jul 2016, 10:52 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 10:50 AMullumulu Oh...a brtitish forces player. Do u fear the ISG against ur mortar emplacment? Want to be more OP? Yeah..than cry after a range nerf. Unbelievable...why do u think that the german should get more nerfs, while the allies have OP units and buggy units (OP USF mortar) and the germans have a bunch of bullshit units (AA emplacement,Pz4 and halftrack) and buggy units (puppchen dont shot themself on tanks). 2 LeiG + flak truck was the original mortar + bofor emplacement before the british came along. Just because the British is more guilty of camping, it doesn't make the OKW innocent. In: COH2 Balance