Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 21:26 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 21:19 PMVuther Pretty sure that's just visual and it's really just +40% accuracy and -20% cooldown at vet 3, regardless of what the men are holding, like the sum of Scripts' offensive benefits from vet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LOYMDi_XR7rILsk6HbAZqGihsk22t-45C_6NbQEP-m0/edit#gid=0 the scoped lee enfield from vet3 are better than the lee enfield rest of the squad are using. Yes, this mean the tommies get more of a boost in firepower than just the +40% acc and -20% cooldown. In: Lobby
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 21:07 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 21:02 PMPuppetmaster I'm not sure why you want to nerf conscripts, sure they are more survivable than they were but they are still pretty crap at doing dps, don't scale all that well offensively, have no lmg be it core or from a doctrine and the only weapon upgrade they do have cripples long to mid range dps while still having to pay mp and fuel for their upgrades to keep them being semi useful in the late game. first, no one use flare mine, so might as well replace it with something useful. "something useful" in this case means a free weapon upgrade. Tommies get two "elite lee enfield" at vet 3 and I think the conscript should get something similar to help with their awful dps. The conscript are trading in their flare mine and the recent durability buff for more DPS in the form of two free weapon upgrade. That nerf to the weapon accuracy bonus is to bring it in line with the other line infantry. The elite mosin nagants are going to be more beneficial anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 20:57 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 20:44 PMWingZero So what do you guys suggest then? Scaling back Riflemen's current buffs will leave us with the same problem as before. Riflemen need some sort of adjustment where the USF player is not floating fuel while lacking man power late game. revert the rifleman and conscript's terminator veterancy and nerf the grenadier's accuracy bonus to match rifleman's. and nerf the Tommies' veterancy as well. here's something I made: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Inz2WPHDuwpHQx8KJHTy4Uw-6vuRZgYQzmHUv_0xNv0/edit In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer (Wehrmacht) Grenadiers 16 Nov 2015, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 17:03 PMZyllen last time i checked maxed out is/rifles have far more firepower then the grens. even guards have more firepower then the grens these days. actually, in certain situation a vet 3 lmg42 grenadier will still have more firepower than a double bar vet3 rifleman. vet3 2bar riflemen: 0 10 20 30 35 66.44951131 46.86322698 31.14046879 22.78079253 19.33754971 vet3 lmg42 grenadier 0 10 20 30 35 33.259402 30.58985495 27.88947124 25.63595732 24.13423875 although if you nerf the vet3 weapon accuracy bonus on the grenadier: 0 10 20 30 35 31.91772017 28.40486531 25.89736615 23.80481751 22.41036456 the advantage get much lower. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 20:03 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 19:11 PMmiragefla Hopefully got the calculations right, but that is pretty high for a base unit with good firepower. I would tone it down a tad more to maybe 10-15%. Or we could find more interesting options like reinforce cost, ability cost or other thing locked into their vet. why does the rifleman need a better received accuracy bonus from veterancy? it's the same bonus the grenadier have. the problem previously was that the grenadier's veterancy accuracy bonus was too high. the grenadier's accuracy bonus should have been nerf to 30% to put it in line with the rifleman, instead of buffing the rifleman's received accuracy bonus and turn them into terminators. This would have also serve to replace the conscript's veterancy buff as well. and the USF doesn't need a t0 mortar either. They already have the pack howitzer as artillery. Giving them a mortar would just be redundant. It's amazing how much different a decent artillery actually make for the USF. instead of always relying on "smoke and flank", the USF now have the option of just shelling the wehr into oblivion. Remember that the wehr is especially weak to artillery due to their smaller squad size. In: Lobby
Thread: Buff Churchill armour, atm it's jelly16 Nov 2015, 11:05 AM it might be jelly, but there's still a lot of jelly to cut through. personally I would have preferred 1280 hp with 320 armor, but the current situation is "okay". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Adjust JP4 cloak range16 Nov 2015, 11:01 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 10:45 AMausterlitz Firefly tulip is batshit broken OP,but no threads on that.Literally one of the most broken abilities in the history of the franchise. You can nerf JP4 when its range is made 60 and OKW gets buff. http://www.coh2.org/topic/42061/firefly-and-the-tulip and the jp4's range is already 60. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 10:35 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 10:22 AMAradan Grens are designing to fight together with mg42. Riflemans must fight alone. That is bad desing this faction. Before riflemas buff and Pershing come, i cannot play USF in team games. In late game , they simply was not enough. If you start searching game it was 90% searching as axis vs 10% as allies. Now it is 50% vs 50%. It is good for this game. And hordes Jagtigers and Elephants? In large team games you meat 2-3 this monsters. You only advantage is well play with riflemans and clear way for m8s ZiS-3 and 6-pounders. The problem wasn't the rifleman, it was the fact their support unit and armor units were either underwhelming or just poor. The problem with the recent terminator buff is the fact it reinforce the mentality that the only unit in the entire USF faction was the rifleman. What should have been buff were stuff like the 57mm or the sherman instead. In: Lobby
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 07:16 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 06:36 AMmycalliope so does weapon accuracy is per model or whole squad..i mean if it is per model then it should be fine on gren as they have lower model count than rifles otherwise if it is whole squad then yeah you are definitely right..otherwise point well made does it matter if it's per model or per squad? I doubt there's a distinction. in the end the wehr is paying 60 mp per man and the US is paying 56 mp per man. In: Lobby
Thread: Riflemen Vet breaks balance (with comparisons)16 Nov 2015, 06:29 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2015, 06:07 AMmycalliope i dont know what u mean by acuracy nerf to grens i mean its ok nothing wrong here....and what u say bout tommies..?? the old received accuracy bonus on the rifleman and current grenadier is .77 the weapon accuracy bonus on the grenadier is 1.40 1.4 x .77 = 1.078, or 107.8%. This mean that at vet3, the grenadier gain a net 7.8 % increase in accuracy against rifleman. by comparison, the weapon accuracy bonus on the rifleman is 1.30 1.3 x .77 = 1.001, or 100.1%. The rifleman gain a net .1% increase in accuracy against grenadier, an insignificant amount. this mean the grenadier had a 7.7% advantage in accuracy when both units are vet3. The accuracy bonus on the grenadier should be lowered to 1.3 since that would cause the received accuracy and weapon accuracy bonus to cancel each other out. and here's an earlier thread I made on the british, although the value should be revised a bit if the grenadier get a nerf to accuracy bonus. http://www.coh2.org/post/create/thread_id/43984/quote/430149 In: Lobby