thekessvn claimed that "And again, RE reinforce cost is higher than normal engineer." which is factually false, SP/pioneers/RO are all more expensive to reinforce.
CE are cheaper to reinforce simply because they are cheaper to build and still follow original reinforcement ratio while RE should reinforce at the same price as pioneers.
all I'm saying that CE are cheaper and better by a mile. Imo CEs is a better combat unit then pios, but pios have 42 sight, so it evens out a bit.
I'm not saying that I agree with OP, that REs should win vs pios in that scenario, my claim is that REs is a bad unit. It is in fact so bad, that you only build it for sweeping. If you give every other faction a self repair, you'd see that there are a lot of reasons to build other engies. These reasons are
Pios: cover, flamer, mines, synergy with hmg42 cause of 42 sight.
Ro E: snare, mines, emplacement building
CE: flamer (extreme synergy), mines.
Sturms: excellent cqc performance, can hide sweeper, shrek. They also have the best repair speed and easiest to vet
And RE: cover (great on the surface, good luck not getting locked when building 2 Tank traps), maybe double zooks. On top of that REs have extremely bad stock combat performance.
Ofc, every engie can sweep, lay wire and cut it. Caches are not included, because I don't care about caches.