Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion5 Jan 2021, 08:20 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 08:16 AMKatitof It might blow your brains out and scatter it all over your wall and ceiling, but token armor reduction does not impact extremely oppressing lethality and pinpoint accuracy of its gun. ATGs struggle to deal with it and that's being fixed a tiny bit. Do you have a valid balance argument for that is not "REEEEEEEEE" based? And Churchill is being addressed this patch, its getting an extra MG. just a 10 armor reductions on all those units. token, tiny and equally valid, since ATG struggle to deal with them too, no? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:51 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:43 AMVipper Elefant can not upgrade to spotting scope and spotting scope has been nefred to ground. There allied unit that can spot on the move while spotting scope need to stationary. spotting is part of the doctrine ability, unfair to remove it without adding anything back. at most elefant spotting scope is activated same as su85 focus sight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion5 Jan 2021, 07:48 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:46 AMAarotron 10 armour loss is such a insignificant change it grand scheme. then do the same for kv1, kv2, kv8, churchills, bd shermans, sturmtiger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:22 AMvgfgff I think increase Brummbar rear armor should be fine. T34-76 are unreliable. Su-85 pen already reflect with panther acc buff. the point is we need fairer justification for brumbar nerf is it because of its high armor, drive it and kill infantry? then that standards need to apply to similar allies heavy AI. same thing with ripping off the arms of Ostt and VSL. If they can overwhelmed early 1v1 non-doc units, then that standards need to look into allies callin infantry and non-doc infantry vet bonus, as they can overwhelm late games in 2v2 and bigger game modes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:17 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:06 AMOlfin Commanders units should give other strategy to the faction ,and not being OP. maybe KV-8 is alright but the Churchill Crocodile is too strong and hard to counter. kv8 rear armor 145 p4 near pen 125 brumbar rear armor 105/126 t3476 near pen 120 su85 far pen 220/242(patch) time to apply same standards with brumbar nerfs! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:12 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:10 AMvgfgff Allies stock AI tank got nerfed too. T70/M8. by the way. KV-8 not fire 1 devastating shot like brumbar or KV-2. only t70 nerfs was too heavy i agree. kv8 flames are much better to clear weapon teams than brumbar brumbar hits harder but more randomised. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:08 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:05 AMSmartie I understand that you nerf op VSL and Osttruppen. But you should combine it with a buff for standard Grens. Right now you are fighting the symptoms but dont cure the disease. And it's fair to ask why Ost doctrinal units are rightfully nerfed when op allied elite infantry call-in units are still untouched. bascially so. doctrine ostt and vsl got ripped apart. 7man cons got some rotation. penals got buffed. shocks, commandos, guards, assualt enginee, sniper pathfinders, officers...allies infantry still OP now brumbar nerf from the heavens! and the plan to nerf pgrens is coming! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 07:06 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 07:02 AMvgfgff Maybe Churchill Crocodile armor but KV-8 armor are already weaker than brumbar (240 vs 260(250 inpreview)) and bothare doctrinal unit. kv8 has higher health, stronger rear armor, faster and turret that can switch between flames and rounds. yes it is a doc units, but somehow not limited to 1. but the point is, the purpose of brumbar nerf came out of nowhere. and we should apply equally to allies heavy AI in that case. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 06:59 AM when i field a brumbar, i dont think of a i-win unit. it is to have a counter to pressure late games vetted allies units. and highly depending on the maps with blockers. at the same time, i know i need to micro it. a loss of attention, due to its field timings, it will be gone in seconds to snare, 60TD and ATG wall. in short, nerf is totally unjustified! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback5 Jan 2021, 06:51 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 06:40 AMvgfgff Yes It is. 260 armor was bounced a lot AT even from SU-85. This is too hard to counter while brumbar fire 1-2shot kill whole squad. They do have high HP that already need 5-6 shot form AT to take it down. plus they performance are better than KV2. I've test more than 10 time. for the same thing on allies side ISU-152 Got nerf too. both armor and range. brumbar is slow and spin around its cannon range is 35 and need to manual fire and slow reload. against sov 6 man teams, brumbar hardly 1-2 wipe. It hits hard enough (if you stand still!) to force you to retreat. su85 has 60 range and 35 sight. su85 also have vet sight. su85 easily ward off brumbar without the armor nerf. again i disagree with the 1-2-3 nerfs to ostt-vsl-brumbar. basically kills ost late infantry game..again! if the mod teams want to close the gap between late game strenghts and compress all units performance for eek-sports. Then they need to look at allies elite infantry and heavy AI tanks too! Why always Ost? In: COH2 Balance