Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback17 Jan 2021, 05:28 AM brumbar armor nerf, bunker buster nerf remember what i said about BD sherman getting a pass? bam here you go. luvnest got his ass handled by BD sherman. and that is with the 'awesome' medium counter jp4 in his unit composition. imagine if you are wehrboo player countering BD sherman...lol stug in 2v2 rank 1000, zooks + bd sherman is a build. back to my question, what's brumbar compensation? when allies faction with armor + AI gets the pass? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion13 Jan 2021, 01:25 AM Rak retreating is fine and adds flavor. Stop trying to kill imagination In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback12 Jan 2021, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2021, 13:21 PMA_E Having played 10 competitive games as wehrmacht on the balance mod, I can confirm that they do seem a lot more viable in 1v1 when not using crutch infantry like ostruppen and assault grens. At least at my level when playing against rank 200-400 opponents. I attribute this to the gren/mg42 formation changes, and the t70 nerf. Most of the people in this thread have probably not even played 1 game on the balance mod, they shouldn't even be allowed to express their opinion on this topic in my genuine opinion. Yes I'm gatekeeping, there should be a rule: "play before you form your opinions or STFU". We've all been guilty of this in the past but it doesn't mean we can't change. Can u test 2v2? Where the chance of double teaming, hit with more varied counters, more defined area of ops. Which are more impactful. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback12 Jan 2021, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2021, 22:33 PMKiwiBirb Ost has 2 problems. 1) Grenadiers and and the mg42 do not synergize well. If your MG is being flanked, you want close range DPS to make the flanking unit back off. 2) Grenadiers cannot build sandbags. This means that you take a lot more damage while defending, causing more retreats and more bleed The second problem could be fixed by building more pioneers, but because they have SMGs they cannot provide combat value without charging and bleeding a lot. This is even worse because their reinforce cost is 20mp and their near dps is low, only the amount of a bolt rifle at near. 5 men grens with g43 would be a solution or a solid option to choose if you want to play this style. Do not get the reasoning for gutting nerfs? Maybe it's too strong for top 1v1, but the other modes and player levels are short changed without any compensation In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:42 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:32 AMKatitof I've got better one. Change all 5 abilities into tiger. why do you need 5 tigers? imo a tiger in german infantry would put it on similar footing to heavy cav plays. it makes more sense now to nerf the vsl grens, since it weakens the mid game, but at least the tiger will help in late game 2v2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:37 AM which part of the upgrade is too potent? who is it potent against? what is considered potent and not? when does it becomes too potent and when does it falls behind? besides, isnt a commander choice and resources paid to upgrade suppose to work well? im just trying to rationalise the reason it got double nerf. i cant with brumbar, so im trying with vsl. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:33 AM need a recap, which part of german infantry is OP? is it too cheap for vsl? too early for vsl upgrade? easily control the early-mid game, zoning out allies play? vsl gren rekt bars rifles and 7man cons and bren IS? vsl gren rekt allies call-in infantry? shocks, guards, rangers, commandos? ppsh smg? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:31 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:21 AMProtos Angelus I propose a new discussion thread. Should Heavy Cavalry commander have big fat horses being ridden by fat rifleman with elite bazookas? i can think of a compensation to german infantry, change the HT to Tiger! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:18 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:08 AMZeroZeroNi m8 that's a 20% ish decrease in both close max range. That is not small though. Did you do a test to see weather their combat performance remains similar. thats correct. the doctrine is called 'german infantry' if the vsl infantry cant even beat stock enemy units, what is the compensation? after patch, why not rename to 'german infantry with some stamps and fireworks' Live vsl barely hold out against allies elites, you need that first strike to do well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback8 Jan 2021, 10:10 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2021, 10:04 AMKyle Not drastically but it's not gonna be the same isn't it? And yeah I do 3 hours of 2vs2 everyday and 9 out 10 game I use brumbar, I notice the thing that mostly bounce from my front armor is AT gun round, those Allies TDs already most of the time pen my ass. So if you gonna ask me about " risk taking " then yeah, most of the time I take my risk to do Bunker buster against Allies AT gun so that's worry me a bit. Just my personal opinion man. I used to be ostwind main but the armor is just not good enough so I switch to brumbar/ yes i agree, to nerf without compensation when brumbar is the clutch unit to clear late games allies positions or marauding vetted infantry blobs. -10 at vet0 -12 at vet2. it counts and it hurts my soul. and soviet fields their kv1 or kv2 with a +8% armor bulletins, i cry hard in frustation. In: COH2 Balance