Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: Dusty Shoutcasts22 Aug 2015, 15:30 PM Beautiful result Really fun commentary too, do more) In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: SU76 - Free Barrage21 Aug 2015, 16:15 PM Yo Kreatir) I think it needs changing too. No need for a unit with good AT to have a free barrage. Dya also think it's weird that the people defending say "it's a useless ability but don't you dare take it!" I think it's more useful than they want to admit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riegel mine and critical fixes15 Aug 2015, 00:54 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2015, 23:19 PMCookiezNcreem 1 well I wont even go into detail about USF and the viability of the M20 mine these days vs ostheer with the insta-counter 222 arriving at the same time. 2 I really think the riegiel is more for snaring heavier fish, like IS2s,and then finishing it with ease,not little puppies like USF tanks. 3 I would settle for the repair critical only improving engine damage by one level 3 - would be an improvement. 1 - Yes, M20 is weak vs US now but that only means that that match-up should be examined. It's not a good basis for leaving the US repair ability as it is. 2 - Riegel is for all and any tanks, same as M20 mine which will blow the treads off any axis tank big dog or little puppy. Riegel is doctrinal too and m20 mine is stock. Whatever the meta, I think it would be worthwhile reassessing the need for USF to have insta-repair of crits. We also need to ask if we even need tread-breaking mines in the game. Should the Riegel and the M20 mine have that ability? It seems too punishing for me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riegel mine and critical fixes14 Aug 2015, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2015, 15:02 PMKatitof If you have AT gun covering the mine, the tank won't escape. If you don't, well, USF doesn't have heavy armor and are most mobile army, why they shouldn't keep that mobility if you aren't prepared for ambush? Also, similar arguments can be said about M20 and its mine. What similar arguments can be made about the M20's mine? Riegel = Doctrine M20 mine = stock Ostheer doesn't have an instant critical repair ability has a doctrinal one in Elite armour and that takes 15 seconds, unlike the US insta-fix. They are totally dissimilar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues11 Aug 2015, 22:12 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 21:39 PMOZtheWiZARD SU-76 is finally decent = outraged cry from Axis only players. Everything as expected. I don't see anyone making an outraged cry. What is it with people seeing a calm discussion and calling it "bitching" and "outrage"? Relax, enjoy the knowledge this thread has thrown up. So, to reply: Yes, it's decent and should be. It has great AT performance and should keep it. Glass cannons are good for balance. I've only suggested nerfing the barrage. Not the TD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Su-76 no longer needs free barrage?11 Aug 2015, 19:11 PM I don't understand why the people saying "it's a poor ability" are the same people saying "don't take it away". If it was that bad, why would you care? Clearly you find it useful. I think usefulness should: A) Have a cost B) Not come in bundles of various types (AI, AT), especially in relatively cheap units. In a game that could be called "Clumping of Heroes", splash damage weapons are very potent. The barrage is good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CAS commander in team games11 Aug 2015, 12:22 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 22:44 PMQueenRatchet123 CAS isnt OP. Its game breaking. Nope. CAS is totally fine. L2plane. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Su-76 no longer needs free barrage?11 Aug 2015, 12:13 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2015, 07:12 AMKatitof You all are bitching about a unit that was extinct forever, suddenly came back and you have no clue on how to fight it. Firstly, not "all" are bitching, half the people are saying they think the barrage is fine. Secondly, no-one is actually bitching. This is a pretty peaceful thread about a suggested small change and everyone was being polite until you showed up. Do you interpret everything as aggression towards you, even if it's benign? Why not just relax and enjoy a discussion instead of trying to aggravate people? ----------------------------------------------------------- So to clarify my original question: A vehicle with great AI like the Ostwind has no AT capability. A TD like SU-85 has great AT but no AI capability. A generalist like a PIV has medium AI and medium AT capability. So why does the SU-76 have great AT but also come with a free AI barrage? There should be a trade-off. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Su-76 no longer needs free barrage?11 Aug 2015, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2015, 08:36 AMKatitof Russian part of 3rd answer made me lul. I smell butthurt here. You should probably stop smelling butts, it might be why you troll so much It's not a huge issue, but I think a tweak is in order. NEVEC, I'm English but I speak Russian. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Su-76 no longer needs free barrage?11 Aug 2015, 04:03 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2015, 03:30 AMFestiveLongJohns I never hit anything with the SU-76 barrage unless I have like 3+ of them barraging the same area. Let's let the SU-76 have its day in the sun before we send him back to the shadows eh? If you're saying that the barrage is bad then why would removing it send the su-76 back to the shadows??? It's good now because of its TD range and penetration and would be balanced like that. The barrage gives it too many advantages. In: COH2 Balance