Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 783

General Information


Thread: Universal carrier rework thread9 May 2019, 21:36 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 21:27 PMShadowLinkX37 EVERYBODY DOWN!!! THIS THREAD IS GONNA BLOW!! What. Am I wrong? What is bad about Vickers? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kubel needs changes9 May 2019, 21:33 PM GOT idea for Kubel. Only if it feels it needs something, depending whether or not it is satisfactory the following changes made. This idea is for keeping up with its consistency and being able to vet somewhat faster. To put it into more action and use since combat engagements are the main way of gaining xp. So this idea... Remove Vet 1 "Map Hack" (since some say it is OP, and OKW has Infrared Half-Track to MAP HACK) for Self-Repair (less OP I suppose, and its a weak vehicle). Should be a bit shitty the self repair speed but does the job kind of thing. Should be worse than the Repair speed for UC, passive the ability for Kubel or requires activation without cost. Understand what I mean? Vet 4 improves its repair drastically. That would be nice for Kubel considering its weak armour. Self Repair activation allows it to move "slow" same as Map-Hack but can not shoot. That is what I think would be nice. Should be around 1/2 to 2/3 as effective as the UC repair speed. Can still cap while repairing. What you guys think? Only if it feels like a nice addition to have for the Kubel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: NEW COMMANDER PREVIEW - 7.0 version9 May 2019, 21:21 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 20:42 PMdistrofio Its not about "making everyone happy". That only encourages cicle buff and nerfs and people arguing each other here on the forums. Being right has nothing to do about being accepted. Cons becoming the new penals to make them mainline inf is just lazy writing, its a bad design. Cons are the "versatile" option for SU as for penals are the "punch hard" aspect of it. If penals were to change in anything it should be to shorten their lifespan ingame. Not making them more fragile, but to make them scale worse into mid-lategame and make them cheaper too. Then buff cons midgame and scalability to make the player choose, either safe aggressive start or a riskier adaptative early into a stronger lategame. One favours vs OST and the other vs OKM. It is kind of hard to resolve what is the best solution then for Conscripts. Maybe a slight price nerf. Around 220-230 manpower. That is my opinion. I mean they are not supposed to a great unit. Good supportive unit, that is for sure. 200 manpower would be a bit too cheap tough. I use it usually in combination with Maxim, that is good. It would be nice to get something more for Cons in their current state. 7 man is nice but they should not have any affect in their performance. Just 1 man addition upgrade without any changes to the way they perform seems like the ideal solution. Upgrade should come after base 1 built. The current 7 man and timing should be changed a bit. Performance should remain unchanged (the 6 man version) and costs 60 ammo. No price refill decrease. That is my idea. In: Lobby
Thread: 1 Million9 May 2019, 21:13 PM I they can give me a hint that it is WW2 and not modern warfare. I will definitely be In: Lobby
Thread: Universal carrier rework thread9 May 2019, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 20:51 PMdistrofio Kubel cancer was denied for a reason, you want it back but in your favorite faction? Sounds pretty biased to me. distrofio comment 43 response to SuperHansFan comment 31 That is true. We do not want that even then the Kubel cancer. UC already has with Vickers upgrade suppression ability which is strong. Why ask for more SuperHansFan. Kubel in contrast has been nerfed for a good reason the suppression arc thingy. Maybe a bit too much tough the past years. Suppression does not come until Vet 5 now (geez, how long would that take?) and you would like to have Suppession arc for UC when they already have the best HMG Vickers. I think UC armour being nerfed in armour is a good decision. It is still strong as I have said. It still bleeds manpower and now with the change gives the axis a slight better chance to damage a bit more than usual. For something that costs only manpower, surely should not be impenetrable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Universal carrier rework thread9 May 2019, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 20:19 PMSeductiveCardbordBox I don't MIND that it got a nerf to its armour so much. It makes the upgrades a much more suspect deal, but hopefully they will allow it it to have the old values back after it upgrades? I can dream. The bit that I object to is that is has less armour, so takes more chip damage, and ALSO they made self repair more expensive for some BS 'gotta trade with fausts' when button and smoke have been unbalanced for so long Brits dont start with engineers Brits can't BUY engineers without unlocking a tech tier The latter makes it totally worthless to buy a UC before you have T1. And as an ultra light, there's no point buying it then anyway. There's so little reason now to ever do anything besides buy an extra section and bolster before you T1. There is still more incentive to use UC. At least you have self-repair, I mean take Kubel for instance. You have to rely on Sturmpios which is not neccessarily a terrible thing but the fact it takes damage more frequently is the annoying part about. Requiring constant repairs. I do not think it should be a problem for UC. It bleeds manpower really well. If they increase cost of UC repair, it should repair until fully healed. Can interrupt process but no refund then. That would make a lot of sense to be honest! That would be great for UC! At least with UC, you can without having to wait for an Engineer to repair. Imagine if could do that for Kubel. That would be insane. Except you would have to grind until vet 4 to get self-repair. That would take a while. GOT idea for Kubel. Remove Vet 1 "Map Hack" (since some say it is OP, and OKW has infared half-track to MAP HACK) for Self-Repair (less OP i suppose, n its a weak vehicle). Should be a bit shitty the self repair speed but does the job kind of thing. Should be worse than the Repair for UC, passive the ability for Kubel or requires activation without cost. Understand what I mean? Vet 4 improves its repair drastically. That would be nice for Kubel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1 Million9 May 2019, 20:42 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 20:36 PMSturmpanther I did it! Just sad i can't use them I wish i could give it to new players in coh2. How many Supplypoints do you guys have? Under a 1000 points lol. Still have lots to purchase. I am bankrupt. I play other video games too. That explains why I still got lots to grind for! Good job tough I know what would be great. A new Axis faction evening the odds. Maybe Italy or Japan would be a nice addition. More points to spend on and make this game great again! In: Lobby
Thread: Universal carrier rework thread9 May 2019, 20:12 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 20:07 PMdistrofio UC are pretty durable, getting nerfed about that is not the end of the world for them. Its like nerfing FHT DPS, they still have a lot. I still think FHT require slight range improvement or damage. It is for its timing not so great. Needs some slight improvements for its timing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: All faction engineers upgrade additional man upgrade9 May 2019, 20:08 PM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2019, 19:42 PMKatitof EFA engineers needs to reliably vet up when equipped with sweepers and CEs need to reliably deal damage(con-like mosin rework). That's literally all any engineer needs. Vet is a problem with them once equipped with sweepers. Having the ability to remove like what Sturmpios would be great also for Engineers and Pios. I think it is a nice option for both to get for 30 ammo additional man. This will help increase repair speed and make them more durable in combat. Other factions have distinct repair advantages amongst other things. SU and WEHR, Pios and Engineers being the only option without any abilities or bases to increase repair speed deserve "Extra Man" upgrade. Well those are my thoughts! Do you think changing Engineers Mosin is a good idea? What is the con-like mosin rework? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Universal carrier rework thread9 May 2019, 19:59 PM At least it is going to be penetrated more often. I feel that it is being more balanced with it being more vulnerable to small arms. It is currently strong at bleeding manpower. It should retrospectively be able to take damage also. Instead of holding ground most of the time able to take hardly any damage from 2-3 Volks squads for a vehicle that costs no fuel and bleed manpower easily in the beginning. It should remain strong in killing power but the small arms should have more chances in penetrating/damaging UC. I do not think I agree with increasing the cost of repairs. Maybe by 5 only. 10 is kind of much unless it heals all the way through. In: COH2 Balance