Profile of Mazianni

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 785

General Information


Thread: T34/85 or KV1 in Soviet Industry Commander? 8 Oct 2019, 02:06 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2019, 21:08 PMMaret In game IRC there is model of zis-truck. Why not make the same ability like OSt have? When truck give you resources and link your points. Truck fit to industry much more than fuel drop. While fuel drop fit more to lend lease as something that comes to you from beyond. I like this idea very much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF infiltration commandos4 Oct 2019, 17:12 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Oct 2019, 16:59 PMcomm_ash Infiltration commandos are far too similar to regular commandos IMO. They just aren't interesting enough for a commander slot. To make them a bit more different, does anyone know if they can be equipped with m1 garands when they pop out of the building? If so, it could be interesting to make them a perma 4 man squad, which specializes in longer range combat and recon. Perhaps give them an upgrade with 1x scoped enfield with a marksman ability/ crit and/or the ability to call artillery and have better sight range? They'd probably need the weapon slot restricted to 1 if this happened, at least with the enfield upgrade. I don't believe the brits used M1 Garands in any number. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing needs a timing nerf3 Oct 2019, 05:36 AM Lowering CP reqs for heavy tanks was a mistake anyway. Should all go back up to 12 or so. Failing that, have to build them would be great (increased cooldown/recharge time of dispatch ability is not sufficient) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Easy USF fix3 Oct 2019, 05:33 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2019, 23:07 PMachpawel IMO M20 is totally overboard because of all the stuff it's got (non doctrine smoke, crew with repairs, crit repairs, a bazooka, teller mine that stops vehicles, ability to upgrade its armour, immunity to small arms, very fast, oh and of course the bazooka is for free - just crazy, and the ability to cap of course - best while repairing) Maybe it is a "combined arms" approach in a nutshell? The M20 isn't immune to small arms, the bazooka requires exiting the vehicle, and the gun is basically worthless versus any other light vehicle, and not even all that great versus infantry. (222/luchs are obviously better, but the 221 pintle MG and WC51 truck MG are also better) The fact so many axis players bitch about the mine is hilarious considering how often the shoe is on the other foot with teller mines, and how rarely these mines are actually laid down in 1v1s considering the million other things USF needs to spend munitions on (including the armor(hp) upgrade you so mention) Basically, the M20 is overboard with utility because it's literally called a utility car and it's not particularly great at anything else, even chasing down snipers after the USF tech patch lowered axed its near main gun accuracy. That said, ditching the bazooka would probably be fine since 9 times out of 10 its a death sentence to try and fend off a 222 with them anyway, and ends with a destroyed or stolen M20 instead of a dead 222. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we Make Bunkers more punishing to use ?29 Sep 2019, 04:51 AM Can we increase fighting position armor or something while we're at it, so they aren't just an easy way to lose half the squad inside when it inevitably goes kaput. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallshirmjager vs Shock Troopes vs Paratroopers23 Sep 2019, 17:02 PM Yes, tests where LMG Paras (120mun upgrade) beat Falls at long range and Shocks beat Falls at short range (though they do lose once). I think everyone has seen this video already and it has already been discussed to death in the main thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: allow 7 man Conscripts PPSH41 or PTRS23 Sep 2019, 12:47 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2019, 12:22 PMLago I'd be hesitant to adjust the raw performance of Shocks: they're finally a state where they're usable but counterable. They could maybe stand to have a later timing though. CP2 is very early for that sort of unit. I'm unconvinced that Guards are still a problem. I can see why people would have philosophical problems with a combination AI-AT squad, but I don't think their present power level is anything to write home about. As for Conscripts? Ditch the sidetech. Conscripts are always going to be an inferior option when you have to pay an extra 230 MP 20 FU just to unlock their utility abilities. A smaller sideteching barrier was enough to all but exterminate Ostheer T2. Throw out Conscript sidetech entirely. It doesn't achieve its design goals. If that cost has to be in the tech tree, put it on T3 so Penal builds can't skip it. So long as the Penal teching path is stronger and cheaper, Conscripts are always going to be off-meta. I like this idea tbh In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments23 Sep 2019, 04:39 AM Not having an 80 second recharge time for the barrage would be nice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!21 Sep 2019, 21:42 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2019, 21:36 PMVipper You better check your numbers again because Paras have more DPS bellow range 20 (up to almost double at close range), smaller target size, grenades, reinforce in beacons and timed charges. I was making the comparison on the basis of the roles of each particular unit variation. If you would like to offer a different comparison, be my guest. Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2019, 21:38 PMullumulu paras win at any range vs fallies...and have 3-4 models left.. Have any evidence to back that up? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!21 Sep 2019, 21:27 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2019, 21:08 PMullumulu When fallsi are OP...than tell me...what are USF paras then, since they outdps fallies easily (win with 4 models left) Rather willing to bet that Falls will win vs Paras with no upgrades 100% of the time. Versus Thompson Paras, I'm also willing to bet they'll lose at close range and beat them at long, and vice versa although by a slimmer margin, versus LMG Paras. Versus AT (Recon Support) Paras you should win at all ranges. What are USF Paras? Vanilla Paras - 360 MP / 350 MP 80 MU - Basically Penals without a satchel charge Thompson Paras - 360 MP 90 MU - CQC unit LMG Paras - 360 MP 120 MU / 350 MP 200 MU - Long Range DPS unit AT (Recon Support) Paras - 350 180 MU - Stealth AT unit Versus Falls which are presently and bafflingly a generalist unit (with camo???), and cheaper. It's really no surprise that Falls should lose in CQC versus Thompson Paras and at long range versus LMG Paras, given those units are supposed to excel at their given ranges, and require good payment to do so. WAD... In: COH2 Balance