Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 20:08 PMSkysTheLimit Is the stug your only unit? You retreat until you get closer to help from the rest of your army. Like I said, it takes the t70 so long to kill it you have plenty of time Unlike the puma vs. su85... Post numbers or GTFO. Real case scenarios show that both units gets displaced because they are outplayed. The same way for each of both And next time quote the whole post, i explicitely said, i you want a real case scenario just ask it. Mr Literall semantics wathever the limit In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 20:06 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 19:54 PMSkysTheLimit More time to retreat your stug... Stug Speed: 6 T70 Speed: 6.9 Good luck "retreating", you are still wrong sir. And before you even mention it, if you really want a real case scenario just mention it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 19:52 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 19:48 PMSkysTheLimit No one is flaming. You are just wrong in this instance You said t70 can bully stug "the same way" a puma can bully the su85. It can't, it takes WAY WAY longer That means it is not the "same way". If it takes longer that means help can arrive before the stug dies Because you defined "THE SAME WAY" as a TIME EXPRESSION does not make it valid. You simply change the meaning of the words on your convenience. You perfectly understand its about circling and runing away of the cone of fire, hitting the rear armor until it gets destroyed. But because you NEED to F people minds you play semantics gimnastics. If you really need Out of the void comparison you could present them in a constructive way. "Mr fallacy" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 17:23 PMSkysTheLimit I didn't say it was impossible. Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 17:06 PMSkysTheLimit Straight up fallacy. I said it can't "bully" a stug. None of your post makes any sense. Why dont you correct yourself in the first place? You know its true but when you get on to someone you start going personal, literal and semantic alltogheter. Just to gaslight other people and disuade their arguments. Sadly i am right and the fallacy is your argumentation. A 1v1 T70 vs stug (as i said) is bullied to death, even if it takes a year or a minute, THE SAME WAY a puma 1v1 vs su85. We have to start reading and stop flaming... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Brits need a new elite or semi-elite infantry unit.22 Jan 2020, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 04:30 AMCODGUY Flamethrower REs...a joke. We shold call you Flamethrower REGUY then. I am convinced they need a 6 man Paratrooper sqaud armed with Lee Enfields upgradable with either 3 scoped Enfields for long range accuracy or 4 Thompson SMGs. They should be as tough as Rangers. They could use the ALO skin or a modified version with a British para helmet if possible. Wait, the last time devs added a new squad with SU airborne guards and now you want that for UKF? I find your lack of creativity... disturbing. And no. If you want USF paras for UKF go play USF, if you need "elite" infantry use commandos. They shred jerrys to pieces. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo22 Jan 2020, 16:35 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 16:16 PMLago That's the point. That's how Obersoldaten, Paratroopers, Commandos, Shock Troops, Rangers and Jaeger Light Infantry are balanced. I get you, but maybe devs wanted specifically that LV dont bully falls. Maybe meds and AI tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 16:26 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 11:35 AMKatitof Puma being 50% cheaper might have something to do with why that IS a problem. Also, jackson isn't exactly a casemate TD that can't turn its gun around, so what's your point here? I think his point is pretty clear, jackson being on the top of the food chain be able to be bullied by some of the lowest steps to turn the pyramid into a cycle. It keeps lategames fluent instead of "mass wathever the lategame unit you have" logic. 50% cheaper is a straight up fallacy. Its 50% FU cheaper, even when we speak about non-bleeding vehicles, MP cost is roughly equal. In the case of TD vs Tank a cost difference is justified, why in this case it is not? Why is so hard to imagine a "Anti-TD" light vehicle role? T70 can solo bully a Stug the same way a puma does to SU85. Damn even FF suffer from fast moving lights, a P4 can cause some serious trouble 1v1 up close. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson VS Puma22 Jan 2020, 05:24 AM This is a off branch from a previous thread discussing a slight M36 armor nerf to reduce P4 bounces at long range. The thread continued with the puma as a light vehicle having some opportunity in a 1v1 vs M36. https://www.coh2.org/topic/103431/jackson-armor-nerf/page/6 Puma vs jackson discussion should be continued here from now on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo22 Jan 2020, 05:04 AM Removing the falls snares will end up in them being bullied by the shittiest yet abundant Light vehicles allied has. Why not simply remove the "snare" part, leaving falls with a single use AT dmg kind of grenade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf22 Jan 2020, 04:59 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 04:04 AMSkysTheLimit I dont disagree. At no point was I saying a Puma can defeat a Jackson by itself Guess what sherlok, some people are trying to first let others understand the chances of a PUMA vs M36 in an open discussion and after that suggest it to have considerable chances to either counter or pose some kind of threat to M36. Its considered a Indirect nerf, plus the armor reduction. And thats no offtopic at all In: COH2 Balance