Profile of Kirrik

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 573

General Information


Thread: About soviet shock troops in WWII19 Oct 2018, 15:52 PM "Shock troops" didnt exist in real life genius. Thats a non-Russian umbrella term for any assault infantry. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch18 Oct 2018, 18:44 PM What can you possibly do to KV-8 other than allowing it's 45mm and flamethrower use at same time? It's not like with 50 pen and 80 damage it would be a threat to anything other than werfers and stukas by the time it comes out In: Lobby
Thread: About soviet shock troops in WWII18 Oct 2018, 15:03 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2018, 14:59 PMVipper Once more pls stop personal attacks. CQC is not limited in urban setting and can easily happen in forest maps. Thus Shock troops are not "urban specialist" as you described them and they will not be until the get specialized anti-garrison weapons. In addition the are offensive troops and not defensive and they do not fit a commander described as urban defense thematically. Urban Defence =/= Defensive doctrine /thread In: Lobby
Thread: About soviet shock troops in WWII18 Oct 2018, 14:58 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2018, 14:55 PMVipper Shock troops are offensive troops not defensive. And? Stug E is clearly not defensive yet is in Defensive doctrine. In: Lobby
Thread: About soviet shock troops in WWII18 Oct 2018, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2018, 14:45 PMVipper They are not "urban combat specialists" they have nothing specially designed for urban warfare over other CQC troops and they certainly do not have anything that help defend. PLS stop the personal comments. CQC troops are desinged for close quaters combat, which is exactly what urban setting is. Stupid does not even begin to describe your trolling attempts here. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch18 Oct 2018, 14:38 PM They are urban combat specialists. Urban defense was never about defense, even prior to rework, stop intentionally ignoring common sense. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch18 Oct 2018, 12:40 PM Urban Defense doctrine was never about defense, it was about agressively pushing enemy and snowballing game, defensive stuff it got was there to protect FHQ from getting getting burned down. Right now it looks more defensive than before rework thanks to incendiary arty being replaced by KV-2 and constant FHQ nerfs In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch17 Oct 2018, 10:35 AM Jagdtiger makes more sense than sturmtiger or howitzer for Overwatch, in fact it makes much more sense for JT to be in Overwatch compared to Breakthrough In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch17 Oct 2018, 10:16 AM Looking back at NKVD before rework its plain obvious the only good thing it received during rework was Commisar. It already had IL-2 loiter + radio intercept and theres absolutely noway anyone would realistically pick it over Guard Rifle or Armored Assault, both these doctrines have good infantry squads/upgrades or late game tank combo while NKVD has Commisar and thats it Who that Commisar is even supposed to support in first place? Cons are worthless late game without upgrades and Penals are forced into PTRS upgrade which kills their AI damage without Guards covering them. This doctrine has no endgame tanks or focus on infantry (something you'd expect from a doctrine with Commisar) and even infiltration units despite disruption being a supposed theme. That doctrine is only in a slightly better state compared to pre-rework. It needs focus on infantry or utility thats not flamethower tanks or meme-traps Urban Defence rework ended up being much better in comparison In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch16 Oct 2018, 21:44 PM Problematic how? KV-2 siege mode is literally worse than it was before rework due to nerfs. Brummbar is not borderline overpowered, it IS overpowered because it's performance is completely insane for it's cost and thats not true for 230 fuel CP 14 heavy. In: Lobby