Profile of CODGUY

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 888

General Information
Steam: 76561198148873125


Thread: What is the purpose of Obersoldaten?5 Aug 2018, 07:22 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 13:54 PMmortiferum Think so, Ullu at least can say he is top something something, I think Codguy's player card doesnt even load. Prob one of those really bad players that whine. Well he played Axis right? Probably Wehrmacht? How hard can it be to rank up with that faction...A level 15 Wehrmacht player is probably equivalent to a level 8 Allied player. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW UP?4 Aug 2018, 18:53 PM LOL OKW does not struggle against UKF. Nobody struggles against UKF at the moment. In: OKW Strategies
Thread: What is the purpose of Obersoldaten?4 Aug 2018, 02:16 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 00:10 AMLago It's an elite anti-infantry squad. You buy them when you need more anti-infantry DPS without spending fuel. All there is to it. Yes and they kick ass at it too. They can 1v1 an Allied HMG. OKW has the best infantry in the game hands down. Frankly I'm surprised they didn't give Obers 5 men. In: OKW Strategies
Thread: What is the purpose of Obersoldaten?3 Aug 2018, 23:18 PM One would think this would be a doctrinal unit but its not so what is their purpose? To serve as a crutch in case you mess up and lose your vet 5 Volksgrens? In: OKW Strategies
Thread: Ass grenadiers are perfect in 2v21 Aug 2018, 01:30 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2018, 14:46 PMKanjejou Imagine a lightning war/or blitzkrieg(well maybe not) commander with ass grenadier in place of the G43. people would be using ass grenadier more. Its that the rest of the commander isnt that great to begin with What are you talking about you get a Tiger with Mech Assault, that alone makes it worth it. Frankly any doctrine with a Tiger with worth it since it isn't like Wehrmacht lacks something in its normal tech tree. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Is brummbar too good?28 Jul 2018, 05:12 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2018, 03:31 AMFarlon Centaur, AI Sherman, M8A1, T70, T34(apparently generalist but wrecks infantry and mostly trash against armor instead of being fine at both). All of which are squishy tanks and get easily blown to hell in short order by the multitude of AT available to OST. I'd have given you some credit if you'd have mentioned the Churchill. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Is brummbar too good?28 Jul 2018, 00:34 AM Ost is the only faction that's allowed to have a functional machine gun, might as well be the only one allowed to have a non-doc functional AI tank. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: German units too cheap or are Allied units too expensive?27 Jul 2018, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 19:36 PMTomDRV Allied nations do require a higher level of skill to play on par with the Axis factions. Ost is generally defensive and it's easy for anyone to set up a defence compared to how hard to is to orchestrate a full on attack. I think I've seen you in games too. tbh I think it's L2P for you. Allied play styles are much different to Axis, I main USF and I feel i do very well, but I lose heavily when I play ost because I keep trying to flank and smoke things. Most Ost units favour sitting at long range and battering the enemy from there. I know from playing USF how much an allied players mouth will water if you come up close with a panther (although I still cant break the habit of flanking/charging with them) Basially Axis powers generally require less micro to pull off, so when you say other Axis units consistently outperform allied units, they will, if you play allies with no more micro than you do with Axis. Although, Mg42 insta suppress should be nerfed to the second burst, or the time taken for suppression to wear off should be reduced. Alot of times my riflemen clip an MG42 (with one model), one burst suppresses them and it takes so long to wear off they loose a close range fight with some grens even though the MG did basically nothing. Well I've got a couple freinds I never give them props for winning as OST because that isn't really a great feat. I always tell them you'll get credit if you win with a faction with a fked up tech tree like USF or a hamstrung one like that was completely nerfed to hell like UKF. Winning as those guys takes some skill. OST is such a babied faction. USF can't have panic call ins like the M10, so we nerf it but OST callins for some reason aren't a problem so yeah go ahead and keep your panic Pumas and command panzer 4s. The .50 cal has too much supression so we'll nerf it, oh but the MG42 can keep its supression, that's totally fine. Its such a joke. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: German units too cheap or are Allied units too expensive?27 Jul 2018, 03:55 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 03:32 AMShadowLinkX37 It’s almost like the most complete factions are the best ones I don’t see any top players complaining about how riflemen are too weak. So now you're admitting OST is better than USF and UKF. Good, we're making progress, that's basically what I've been trying to say this whole time. Now lets ask why? Because OST is more complete? Yes, also because they've never gotten any hard nerfs to any of their key units unlike every other faction. No MG42 nerf, no mortar nerf, no OP grenade nerf, none of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: German units too cheap or are Allied units too expensive?27 Jul 2018, 02:20 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jul 2018, 02:11 AMinsaneHoshi Being only slightly better than the worst is no way to go through life. It doesn't matter how good or bad you think I am just look at the GCS2 matches yourself. Most of those were OST vs Soviets, and that's not because USF or Brits were such awesome, balanced factions. In: COH2 Balance