Profile of murky depths

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 607

General Information
Last Visit Time: 29 Sep 2021, 18:14 PM


Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers22 Mar 2018, 21:18 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 21:15 PMStug life then why ost doesnt go for tier 4 ? MAYBE CAUSE OTHER THAN BRUMBAR THE UNITS ARE BAD ? I don't think they're bad, but rather their tier 3 is so good they don't really need to. How often did soviet players go tier 4 when t-34 was still in tier 3? In team games, ost goes tier 4 quite regularly because those matches can take much longer. 1v1 I find rarely goes long enough for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers22 Mar 2018, 21:14 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 21:11 PMStug life seems a bit biased as all u saying pw is stricly better at all ranges when kat is used in 1 vs 1 too while pw are very rare That's a question of teching though, not of unit performance. As soviet you always go tier 4, wehrmacht does not need to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is OKW dead? what's your opinion? 22 Mar 2018, 18:53 PM And yet, every time I play (which is a few days a week) I see people playing OKW just as much as they play Ostheer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters22 Mar 2018, 17:35 PM Biased opinions you say? Oh dear. We can't have that, now can we? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers22 Mar 2018, 16:09 PM Still there as of now. Can test when I get home to confirm, but I'm like 95% certain it's there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers22 Mar 2018, 15:25 PM PW is great, what it doesn't wipe it also suppresses. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters22 Mar 2018, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 14:36 PMZombiFrancis But my point was less about faction fundamentals and more about player choice and gameplay. This point seems to be lost in a lot of the theoretical discussion that takes place. For every time I see someone say "unit x is bad" on these fora or in twitch, I notice at least one game where my team mates or my opponents use said unit and it seems to work out just fine. Also, it is bizarre to me how absolutely deterministic a lot of people's minds are regarding "if you do x, then you are bad" or "if you don't do y, then you are bad". There's some obvious cases, ofc -- like never making an AT gun at all in a game where you are being outmatched by enemy armor, but the thing I refer to is less obvious and more a display of the person's attitude than the probability of the game's progress. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grenades vs garrisons21 Mar 2018, 15:04 PM From everything I've seen about DoW2 multiplayer, I am very happy CoH2 is dissimilar to it and would be even happier if it is intentionally pushed away from DoW3 design. Also, I like that a grenade in a building doesn't auto-hit all units in it. If it's a huge building, it shouldn't, and part of the appeal of a huge building should specifically be that your units are more spread out. Part of the risk of a small building being the opposite. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What are your ideas of coh 3 commander system?20 Mar 2018, 02:05 AM Regardless of which system, ideally it'd avoid the stupid nickel-and-dimeing scheme. Preferably a system with less redundant overlap and more even handedness. Compare the number of commanders for Sovu or Wehrmacht to say, brits or the WFA. In: Lobby
Thread: The tech cost for LMG, rifle-grenades and bundle grenades. 18 Mar 2018, 05:56 AM Jesus man, arguing "semantics" indeed. In: Lobby