Just stating they overlap is worthless, you're not a high level 1v1 player.
Dude, Arrigo Sacchi - the great Italian manager of AC Milan during their dominant spell in the late 80’s and early 90s - was a shoe salesman and bound to fail as a coach because, well, he didn’t have the "requisite experience as a player."
Sacchi’s response to this:
“I never realised that one has to be the horse in order to be the jockey.”
The same quote could come from Gregg Popovich (winning 5 NBA rings with the Spurs),
Phil Jackson - a role player but great coach (winning 11 rings with 2 franchises) or Jürgen KLopp who was only a 2nd division player (and a bad one).
There are more than enough examples of analysts, coaches, managers who are great in what their doing without having being a great player. There are also A LOT of great players who suck as managers and coaches. And there are great managers/coaches who were great players too (Cruyff, Zidane, Guardiola etc.)
What does that tell us? It should always be about the quality of the argument on this forum and not about the "rank".
You post good arguments on this forum but i absolutely dislike the elitist behavior. I dont think that you need this "you are no top level player", "show me your player card" bullshit. Let your arguments speak for themselves because they are good.