Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Increase light jaegars price22 Dec 2018, 05:06 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 04:13 AMNaOCl It doesnt though, Cons can beat them, you're just shit. I'd be happy to beat you with Sov tier 1 whilst you play JLI spam. All your posts make it evident you just plain suck. "cons beat them" -NaOCl 2018 yeah cons can beat them in the same way a T34 can beat a king tiger >.> you are saying the objectively worst core infantry squad ingame can beat a penal killing jagerspam... as kat previously mentioned... id like to know where your dealer is In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price22 Dec 2018, 05:04 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 04:18 AMNaOCl Goes Shocktroop Goes Conscript PPsH Goes Clowncar Goes Mechanised totally not overpowered when the strongest strategy of GC2 becomes irrelevant because of a 70% crit sniper... whats next? should we give axis a leopard 2? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price22 Dec 2018, 03:48 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Dec 2018, 03:06 AMNaOCl JLI are fine, learn to close the distance, their DPS gets worse at close range, unlike most squads who have higher dps at closer range "i just want to roll over sov T1 consistently" argument... when a unit obsoletes an entire faction you know theres a problem In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase light jaegars price22 Dec 2018, 03:47 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 23:50 PMaddvaluejack You are really a double standard man. So, give me an unit which cost 20 fuel but perform worse than OKW's 221. An unit's performance should be related to its price, don't you think so? the 221 is a utility vehicle... it gets plenty of abilities for its price like healing drops recon and vet 1 smoke and can become a cache upon upgrading... its perfect for chasing down retreating squads and blunting T1 aggression before sov can get the guards out... its not overpowered like JLI but its stronger than you think... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Major Unbalancing22 Dec 2018, 03:34 AM the only real problem i see with soviet T1 play vs OKW is JLI and the 221... jager light infantry snipe penal models like crazy when having a few volks to screen for them... and the 221 is strong enough to deny most of the aggression from the M3A1 negating much of the advantage of sov T1 play... other than that sov T1 can win over okw if played well.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 21:44 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 21:31 PMStug life u can't off set by the starting mp cause we are counting fuel here, if u want to off set by mp count the mp for tech cost too (again u are cherry picking the thing u want) as i said starting MP is problematic to factor in... it can be used for greater field presence which affects fuel INCOME by alot more than starting fuel... as for cherrypicking its actually a bigger bias to factor in starting fuel without factoring starting MP considering how MP can be traded to fuel by field presence Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 21:31 PMStug life and as i already said they do have cons they just need stv at tier 3 no need to make them cost less screwing up the ost vs soviet match up hmm ostheer grens scale much better than conscripts anyways... as per earlygame ost can rely on grens + mg-42 to prevent getting overwhelmed... by the time grens get the LMG they will slaughter cons regardless of their price... the problem with cons getting the SVT and nerfing the volks to cons level of cost efficiency means WFA infantry can simply slaughter OKW... OKW needs that cost efficiency to stand against WFA infantry... grens on the other hand can team up with the mg-42 x sniper to beat WFA infantry... in turn grens + mg42 can do to cons like what rifles do to volks... focus firepower and eliminate one by one until LMG-42... this way cons will have a superior earlygame in exchange for an inferior lategame in contrast to the even earlygame and inferior lategame (without PPSH) that we see today... and no ppsh is doc it doesnt count.... Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 21:31 PMStug life if u want to change volks im all in i dont like nor how they play now nor the stg (i said change not nerf) messing with volks may be a bad idea... they may be plenty times more cost efficient than riflemen... but they trade their cost efficiency for individual strength... rifles can beat them by focusing their firepower... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life ok , first u say i take 2 p4 vs 3 t34 then u magically add a vloks squad, if u calcualte it with other untis it all goes to shit as i can say well 1 tank vs 3 tank the 1 tank win cause u have 4 at gun behind him, 3 t 34 are btter than 2 p 4 in a vacum cause that's the only way u can calculate them , if u count them in context there are too many variable the implication was flanking with that extra T-34 is normally unfeasable in a battlefield situation unless you wanna get fausted... in a realistic setting those T-34s would come at an offset angle eventually being closed up as the P4s retreat from being flanked which is situation B Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life just so u know there is no side armor only rear( the tank are 50%50 rear and front armor), a t 34 has 100% chance to pen the rear armor of the p 4 and around 50 chance from the front while the p 4 has around 75% to pen the t 34/76 form the front wither u got unlucky or u didn't test while stationary(u were prob moving only the soviet tank and got the accuracy debuff) i know how the game mechanics work... i moved the tank since its a flanking tank after all... i cant simulate a perfect engagement but the results still conclude with a decisive panzer 4 victory... the test shows that quite literally the only time the T-34 wins is if the P4 commander is too dumb to move his tank in any direction... Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life again u did not count the starting fuel offset by their significantly higher starting MP... okw cutoff and deny sov fuel easier with the increased MP they have... regardless results would mostly be the same except a -15 diff between those numbers... for all intents and purposes i dont add it as the thanks to their increased starting MP... variables would mess everything up Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life like a said for okw it's optional to get LV they CAN skip it, while soviet are mandaory but cheaper (count cost from tier 1 to tier 3 of okw and cost of tier 1/2 to tier 4 for soviet) its the same reason why axis doesn't get optional upgrade they are mandatory but a bit cheaper with less freedom OKW can get to LVs cheaper sov T2 20 + T3 85 vs okw T2 45 + 15 sws Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life btw Molotov are not 15 from long time, when was the last time u played soviet ? mmkay -5 to the fuel calculations ive done then... still it doesnt change anything okw teching remains cheaper... Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life by ur logic usf gets 1 2 free squad with thompson out of the stock, 1 free recon , 1 fake falre, 1 of map art, 1 free bar tech, 1 free zook tech,free retreat point, usf doesnt get a free bar anymore nor does it get a free zook... yes USF does get a free retreat point recon and arty... but that arty isnt too good mind you (unlike pathfinders) and the major should never see combat... only the retreat point and recon are good imo which btw okw gets a free turret and AA building at that point meanwhile eastern factions (ost and sov) usually dont get free shit (except panzerfaust but its part of balance)... but are SUPPOSED to exchange that free shit for different abilities and high efficiency... grens mg-42 mortars and snipers are REALLY GOOD... conscripts and maxims are worth a hot dumpster fire and compensate with nothing... its all part of assymetric balance supposedly... but there is no assymetric balance when cons and maxims are complete trash Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life and soviet get free merge on cons, free hurra, free 6 man support weapons, ok 2 can play at that game... free fausts free incendiary nades free (no commander needed) weapon upgrades Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:50 PMStug life news flash EVERY FACTION pays in some way what they have be more teching cost, side grade, lower performance of the units, missing unit type, etc, if u want u can count unit in a vacuum when they are base but then u can't be picky for what they get after (we only count upgrades not vet, 6 man squads is a feature while axis get thing for free reeee, "well i mean the 25 pounder are shit so they don't count gough" etc) u either count every advantage a unit has by being in the factions or none, not only what is convenient for u meanwhile YOU CLAIMED that OKW pays for sidetechs with trucks which i disproved as complete BULLSHIT*... all ive mentioned from the beginning is that they have cons have very few advantages while having soo many...cons.... that it SIMPLY DOESNT MAKE UP FOR IT... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 20:52 PMthedarkarmadillo 220mp for the Maxim is a no go. It would be spammed harder than ever, even with viable cons. I think the trick for the Maxim is to stop trying to pretend it's in the same bracket as 4 man mgs and price it accordingly, with proper performance. This can be compensated with cheaper cons. Basicly Soviet lineups would be sort of con heavy to match squads, with support elements being strong but priced accordingly, if not at a premium. For example if the Maxim suppressed half way well but was 300mp (random number) spamming would result in low field presence, you would need filler squads to hold the enemy - this would be conscripts. They being cheap chaff and NOT priced the same as proper combat units (as they do not perform as such) would create a nice role of support being SUPPORT and not your mainstay troops. Similarly elite troops would need to be adjusted with this in mind so that spamming cons into guards wouldn't be viable (perhaps elite troops reinforcing slower and at a premium as well) but I think there is potential in that design philosophy. nono i meant a price of 220 for the conscript and an increase of suppression and dps of the maxim... oops In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 20:34 PM lastly i have no intention of truly nerfing the OKW panzerfaust behind a 25 fuel tech despite okw having cheaper teching... its part of assymetric balance... (supposedly).. im just trying to pop that "okw has expensive techng" bullshit no the real point of this entire discussion is that conscripts need to be better to compensate for the expensive side techs... a cost of 220 for cons and increased suppression and damage for the maxim should fix it... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: can we now fix soviet T2 please?21 Dec 2018, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Dec 2018, 19:18 PMStug life i wonder how can u tolerate the soviet stealth tank and at guns if so afaik soviet at guns and tank destroyers only cloak when stationary unlike the rakaten... soo really if youre attempting to equate the two it simply doesnt work... In: COH2 Balance