Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch21 Sep 2018, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2018, 09:34 AMWiderstreit And what's Jackson's role, not to be a Panther? To be fair, there is no need for Sherman. And if, the Tiger has to be optimiced with 55 to 60 range to deal with that. Well, i can see why an alternative take on the classic medium health low armor tank destroyer can be appreciated. Commanders are meant to offer different tools that aren't necessarily better or worse (see osttruppen) but just a different way to deal with enemy units. A ez8 with no ai except pintle, 260 armor and hvap penetration that cost, lets's say, 165 fuel and has 50 range would be acceptable In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch21 Sep 2018, 08:49 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2018, 08:11 AMaerafield Yeah but they gotta do something about the 76mm sherman man. Right now it's just such a horrible idea to go for this unit in teamgames (instead of just Jacksons + BAR spam) as you will get bullied so hard by Panthers, you even need to pray that the 76mm sherman can win a 1v1 vs OKW p4. Can we get some testing with this ability? I am curious if a HVAP ammo sherman can stand even a small chance vs Panther, JP4 or OKW p4 despite the RoF penalty Why not turn it to a US panther with less survivability but still way cheaper then ? I don't think ANYONE disagree with the fact that 76mm Sherman should become useful, but i don't really think ANYBODY can claim this is a good solution either, right ? In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch21 Sep 2018, 08:43 AM > Putting PanzerFusiliers in Elite Armor Too controversial > Giving a generalist 125 fuel tank 12 pop with pintle mg, 75% moving accuracy and radio net a quasi stug-like penrtration shell Yep good idea In: Lobby
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 17:29 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 17:12 PMDangerous-Cloth They deserve it. Digging their own grave, one patch at a time. They did, they are now trying to cash in with OPremiums n stuff for mad collectionists that want every single tank. But the game is decaying, not a single air/ground mode has been added for years. In: The Library
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:55 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:50 PMKirrik Russian website is literally book you're talking about. And how does it extrapolate from it ? Is it any different from the figures shown in the wiki ? I guess i will never know because that is russian i'm trying to read. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:48 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:40 PMKirrik For real? Do you even know that everyone can write everything in wikipedia? here is actual source in Russian. It deals mostly with human casualties during operations not vehicles loses http://lib.ru/MEMUARY/1939-1945/KRIWOSHEEW/poteri.txt TL;DR Total amount of lost vehicles =/= amount of vehicles lost in combat, these are different things. Tanks and SPG's captured in early war after being dumped due to no fuel or ammo is also counted in there Krivosheev isn't "anyone", russian website about some book that they can't even possibly translate in english is. Try presenting a proper counterargument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:35 PMKirrik I just read source directly, those irrecoverable loses are for human casualties, not tanks. And yet the page is about EQUIPMENT... Soviet Union According to Grigori F. Krivosheev: "All losses of arms and equipment are counted as irrecoverable losses, i.e. beyond economic repair or no longer serviceable"[15] 83,500 tanks lost: 5,200 heavy tanks, 44,900 medium tanks, 33,400 light tanks (including 11,900 Lend-Lease tanks and self-propelled guns lost[16]) 13,000 SPGs lost: 2,300 heavy SPGs, 2,100 medium SPGs, 8,600 light SPGs 37,600 Armoured car and half-track (including 5,000 Lend-Lease armoured personnel carriers lost[16]) Just quit trolling In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:28 PMKirrik These are not number of tanks destroyed, these are of armored vehicles out of action. You can lose same tank several times by having it detracked than towed for repairs, it does not even imply combat loses I already pointed how it clearly SPECIFY tanks and tanks ONLY, and how losses are counted as such only as unrecoverable. Is LITTERALLY in the post over yours...just admit you are trolling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:14 PMKirrik 120k tanks, is that some alternative facts wehraboos get at Stormfront? I just googled 80k that number and that does not even imply destroyed tanks. Thats number of vehicles out of action for whatever reason, including stuff stuck in mud or detracked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II Not to be that guy, but being COMPLETELY UNAWARE of how much vehicles soviet have lost i just googled it and Krivosheev, a russian historian says that 83,500 soviet TANKS, much more being the vehicles. " "All losses of arms and equipment are counted as irrecoverable losses, i.e. beyond economic repair or no longer serviceable" " Loxley number is right, what about you actually address points politely instead of hurr durr-ing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Generalist balance.20 Sep 2018, 16:07 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2018, 16:01 PMZombiFrancis That the only Panzer 4 with a stub nose gun is the command p4 or that the 222 scout car is over twice it's actual size or that at guns and artillery are dragged by people and not horses should be indications that this game isn't going for complete accuracy. Well people have been complaining about both (especially 222). In: COH2 Balance