Profile of LoopDloop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3053

General Information


Thread: Some change for UKF25 Nov 2019, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2019, 09:13 AMVipper Thomposn are SMG and STG are assault rifles, they are weapons with different profiles and they should not be compared. My suggestion was to make create different tech paths for UKF and have bren work similar to bar and Vickers K similar to LMG42 But one could improve the sten instead of messing with the Thompson which is a problematic weapon. They're both automatic weapons with weird profiles and are both very strong. I don't see why they are not comparable in any way in that sense. There's only one assault rifle in the game and only one SMG that performs like the thompson does so they're a lot closer to each other than they are to any other weapon really. Bren working like a BAR would be interesting. It'd have to come with a removal of the out of cover penalties to reload, CD, and RA if it's going to be useable at all on sections though. I guess if stens were massively improved and given to sections with some sort of upgrade that'd be functionally the same. But at that point why is the thompson so "problematic"? IMO it'd just be easier to give them a couple thompsons like the lend lease doctrine upgrade (which, as far as I can tell, isn't overly "problematic") and call it a day instead of making yet another weapon profile for a gun that already has 3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdtiger is horrible 25 Nov 2019, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2019, 08:35 AMblvckdream What I didn't mention in the OP but find very annoying about the JT is that it can't even reliably kill two Allied TDs from the front. A pair of vet 1 Jacksons always beat it even if you just let them sit AFK in front of the JT. With the SU85 it is more RNG because they don't have 300+ penetration but still often not in favour of the JT. Well maybe that's why JT outranges them. If you're within Jackson range you're using it just as wrong as people who put jacksons in panther range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Rankings in 1v1 25 Nov 2019, 02:28 AM bruh who said usf is the weakest lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some change for UKF25 Nov 2019, 02:03 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2019, 02:00 AMFarlion There is the Sten. Stens (even the current assault section profile stens) wouldn't really cut it coming at AEC tech timing though, especially on 4-man squads. It's not like the current assault section upgrade in lend-lease is incredibly OP or anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some change for UKF25 Nov 2019, 01:59 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2019, 22:46 PMVipper PLS no more Thompson the weapon was designed with an abnormal OP profile because it used by elite units. It should not become available to every unit out there. Do you have a better solution than that? UKF needs something legitimately good for close quarters or mobile combat. Also, pgren stgs have a weird really powerful profile as well, and they're nondoc on the faction most similar to UKF but also objectively better at almost everything now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some change for UKF24 Nov 2019, 16:40 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2019, 13:29 PMSupport Sapper Some nice ideas you have there, but put all in hammer/anvil specialization is a bit too late for those upgrades. It will be nicer if some can be split into T2 through Bofors/AEC tech, basically hammer/anvil from platoon cp. +1 Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2019, 16:16 PMdistrofio I don't like them, cqc RE is a bad solution to close range fights. If hammer/anvil is available at t0 it should only affect tommies, other buffs are just OP. Anvil early bonuses are OP if we consider that churchills will enter the battlefield after. Bolster sjould be locked after anvil upgrade too Should be available at platoon CP (with AEC/bofors tech) instead of T0 then. Also, I kinda think tommies should be the ones with the thompson upgrade as well. Bolster should not be dependent on anvil now that tommies are shittier, cheaper to reinforce grenadiers with less utility. They're objectively way worse without bolster and they need to keep that as an option all the time IMO. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdtiger is horrible 24 Nov 2019, 04:47 AM Yeah because hardcountering tanks and being able to kill infantry and teamweapons really isn't enough. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove faust from falls6 Nov 2019, 02:44 AM pls In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Replace Falls' Faust with button?3 Nov 2019, 02:14 AM Just remove the damn faust. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My Proposal to change Allied TDs3 Nov 2019, 00:59 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2019, 19:32 PMShadowLinkX37 This will change how easily allied AT guns can hit heavies + panthers, making them more accurate as well. Agree with stormjager. Jackson needs an actual nerf instead of: who would win? 68 tons on krupp steel vs one open top boi. +1 Jackson could use a reload nerf. That way it counters heavies still and still has the advantages it's supposed to, but it's less lethal. If a reload nerf hits it too hard, pen could be buffed to compensate. In: COH2 Balance