Profile of Lago

Which has nothing to do with DPS.

Which is why DPS isn't meaningful. What matters for snipers is how quickly they snipe models and the value of the models they're sniping.

If you give the Soviet Sniper and the Ostheer sniper the same sniping speed then the Soviet sniper is more effective: each shot inflicts more manpower bleed because it's killing more valuable models and swings infantry fights harder because the strength of Ostheer squads is divided between fewer models.

What if you already have one on field before the first engagement?
Its not like its not happening, it even happened on the tournamnet.
And there still is question of okw pfussies.

I'm not sure what you're getting at here. If you use larger squads with lower reinforcement costs then your opponent will get less value from their sniper.

It leads to misleading comparisons. Sniper damage is completely unaffected by the defences of the squad it shoots at.

The new Soviet sniper shoots more slowly than the Wehrmacht one because in the Ostheer/Soviet matchup Ostheer has fewer models and smaller squads. If they had the same rate of fire the Soviet sniper would be strictly better.

we’re going to be focused on communicating more clearly with our players

That's never a bad move. Glad to hear this.

who need tech when you can callin the pershing without teching and need only your mainline superior infantery and can safe all fuel for 2 or 3 perhsing if you failed to move them...?

For the same reason Ostheer can't stay at T2 and stall for the Tiger. Your opponent will get their medium armor out and roll over you. If you're floating three Pershings worth of fuel then your opponent's likely been able to field two Pershings worth of tanks. That doesn't end well for the Pershing when you finally call it in.

In general players seek out the most effective strategies. If those strategies aren't fun to play and play against then the game isn't fun and the game dies.

On one hand I can sympathise with those who don't like seeing things made the same unnecesarily: I'm not confident the Soviet sniper needs to be a one woman squad rather than just having its received accuracy change.

On that other hand people are taking this stance to ridiculous levels. I've seen people lamenting the loss of the Panzerschreck Volks Blob and the suppressing Kubelwagen in the last few days. If you consider the Volksblob unique flavour worth preserving then I don't know what to say to you.

Some things are little asymmetries worth preserving but some things were just bad in practice and needed to go.

2nd part you're talking about is something completely different, its asymmetry and I also do not agree that asymmetry should be sacrificed in favor of balance and mortars generalization is the best example.

I believe factions should have different tools to achieve same goals, meanwhile everyone seems to be getting same toys patch to patch.

I'm not sure there is a mortar generalization.

The patch notes give the impression of mass standardization because of the strange way they're written. However, the overwhelming majority of changes to the mortars were to traits that were already uniform. The only mortar being 'standardized' is the USF one and that change amounts to a normal setup/teardown speed and slightly more range.