Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 23:50 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 23:49 PMsiddolio I don't agree with the change, Tank Destroyer nerfs were part of the scope. Seems it just fell in with the rest despite not really over-performing in a meaningful way. It doesn't seem like much of a nerf to me. It's more of a QoL reduction. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 23:46 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 23:43 PMsiddolio Brummbar is overperforming in 2v2 right now I'll take your word for that. Is there a similar justification to the changes to SU-85 focused sight? It looks to me like it simply makes the ability less responsive which isn't ideal. Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 23:45 PMsiddolio Already went over this change earlier in the thread, if you read what I put and still disagree i'd love to know why I'm actually wondering now if the Bren rework will balance out the viability of the Resupply HT. Vickers Ks are a way for double equipped Infantry Sections to get their old power level back. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring update from design point of view. 18 Apr 2018, 23:31 PM Buffing the M3 medical kits should be avoided imo. The reason is that M3 can be given to other players in team games and can become problematic. Healing is already shareable with teammates. Just walk your infantry over to a friendly ambulance, medbunker or Battlegroup HQ and they'll be healed. In: Lobby
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 23:08 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 22:55 PMLuciano These are not the final changes. Maybe those changes will be introduced in further patch versions. I was more wondering why the small edits to non-overperforming units made it into the initial scope. Fixing the OKW tech fork, reworking indirect fire and tuning down some overperforming units and abilities are all high priority changes I understand and can get behind. There are a lot of little edits to units that don't seem to be high priority, however. I don't personally understand why the little nerfs to non-overperforming units (the Brummbar, Katyusha and SU-85 for example) made it into the first set of patch notes when what I'd assume to be higher priority changes, such as fixing the USF tech fork, didn't. I'm not saying there isn't a good reason for it, I just don't understand what it is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 22:42 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 22:35 PMLuciano Yes. But like the thread mentions, these are not the final changes. We've brought tons of changes to make in addition to the ones that are on the list but we cant keep adding things because we need time to test, if we want this patch hitting on spring we should focus on the main scope first. If focusing on the main scope is the priority why all the little changes to other units? I'm surprised the ISU-152 and the Brummbar are considered higher priority changes than balancing the USF tech fork. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 22:26 PM Just overall on the patch notes so far there are some decent hits, and there are some very large misses. I'd elaborate but no one listens to my recommendations anyways i listen to them Relic decides what is on the scope, we propose ideas and discuss but they are the ones that have the last word, they also like to work with community and they have open ears to recomendations Did Shocks and USF Captain Tier not come up? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thank You For The Patch18 Apr 2018, 19:50 PM It's balance patch time again and with it comes the avalanche of discussion threads. People care a lot about the game's balance and therefore there's a lot of impassioned debate and discussion over which units are changed and how. It's the nature of these discussions to zero in on the changes we disagree with: the things we're happy about we don't tend to say much on because there's not much to say. The side effect of this is that the discussion of patch notes is usually overwhelmingly negative so I figured I ought to put up this thread to counterbalance that a bit. Thank you to Relic for continuing to support the game, thank you to the Balance Team for working on yet another patch in your spare time and thank you to Sturmpanther for effectively acting as an unpaid Community Manager since about last November. There's never going to be total agreement on what gets into a new patch but we can all appreciate the work that goes into making them and that we still get them at all. In: Lobby
Thread: I strongly oppose the Soviet sniper change18 Apr 2018, 16:48 PM Remember that the Soviet sniper's offensive abilities have been buffed in return: it fires and cloaks faster now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 15:53 PM The IS-2, the KV-2, the King Tiger, Shock Troops and the Stuart are all units that'd be nice to see buffs or reworks for. Not sure we will this patch though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 15:06 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 14:41 PMwandererraven It mean Special ops Regiment If have munition point Should Tommy use double Vickers K because Better Long range Dps than Bren ? PS I hate Vickers K Gun sound Probably. The Bren is a 45 munition weapon now so a double Vickers K squad should be significantly more powerful if significantly more expensive. Come to think of it, that might actually be enough to save the Resupply HT from the trash heap. In: COH2 Balance