Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Cost of Grenade unlocked being Reduced for USF16 Feb 2020, 21:52 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 21:52 PMCODGUY Almost everything is way too expensive with USF USF it's nice that something is being made cheaper even if it will probably have almost no effect. Why do you play a faction you hate so much? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Light Vehicle Penetration16 Feb 2020, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 20:46 PMT.R. Stormjäger Stuart’s vet 3 sight range is legit already. If it got a recon mode, it'd lose that. I'd have no problem with that: if the unit's meant to be a scout, locking core functionality behind vet is dumb. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commandos vs 222´s16 Feb 2020, 20:39 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 20:34 PMdistrofio But thats the only option OST gets, nor 251 or ostwinds do the scout job nor the light job. The 251 does it great, and both vehicles are half the price of a normal light. I think the 222 and M20 Utility Car should have similar armour given how similar their roles are, but the 222 isn't a bad light against most units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Have mines give munitions when swept16 Feb 2020, 17:50 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 07:25 AMKatitof Not having your squad/vehicle exploded isn't good enough now? I have no problem with anything that discourages S-Mine spamming. Including just removing S-Mines. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commandos vs 222´s16 Feb 2020, 17:48 PM The 222 really could stand to have a little more frontal armour. It's got 9, while its only equivalent (the USF M20 Utility Car) has 11 before skirts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change16 Feb 2020, 00:34 AM One interesting way to balance buildable cover is to disallow building bags on capture points. Then any cover position you build can potentially be taken over unless you wire it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ass gren buff15 Feb 2020, 11:52 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2020, 11:35 AMZeroZeroNi what about ost??? specifically late game when they +50% elite thompsons that no onle else has?? Ostheer is better against UKF than OKW, largely because team weapons are good against UKF's incomplete roster. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ass gren buff15 Feb 2020, 11:26 AM Assault Grenadiers are fine. Assault Sections might be too good against OKW, but if the double Sturmpioneer open worked on Assault Engineers I'm not too worried. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stuart Stuff Poll15 Feb 2020, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2020, 01:17 AMDoomlord52 The puma is also useless against infantry, whereas the Stuart is at least decent. That's the trouble with the Stuart, and to some degree the AEC: they're not quite AI-focused like the Luchs, T70 or 222, but they're also not quite AT focused like the Puma. Compared to other AT-LVs, the Stuart also has a vehicle crew, which is a considerable bonus that (imo) offsets the lack of smoke. Would you ever build the Stuart if building the AEC or Puma instead was an option? The current Stuart sacrifices the Puma and AEC's scaling for mediocre AI USF doesn't need and excessive armour that's only good for messing up the Ostheer matchup. It needs neither. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: StuG E rework/buff thread14 Feb 2020, 03:10 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2020, 02:52 AMKiwiBirb This would simply make it less worse than the Ostwind. Key being that it would still be worse than the Ostwind. Any buffs combined with price increases will just bring it further in line with the Ostwind or Brummbar, making it redundant. Another option could be to nerf it and reduce its cost so that it comes at around the same time as the OKW puma so that the light tank gap in Ost's roster would finally be filled. this was suggested by Unit G17 in the Ostheer tech restructure post. My suggested tech rework would accelerate its timing a fair bit. In: COH2 Gameplay