Posts: 1563
honestly I like their 6 th men upgrade.
Since that seem to be trend, now days one could apply the same logic to Ass.Gren also instead of the weird 6 man upgrade.
Posts: 1563
assgren sacrifice good scaling for a early game punch, they can basically sprint to cons in green cover and win by a large margin, just dont get caught in 2vs1 fights.
and mg42 + assgrens bodyguards is very hard to deal with in the first minutes, since you basically cant flank it.
So a buff to them is a big no from my side, they have to scale worse in order to balance their early game punch
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Not as much as +65.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Not as much as +65.
Posts: 52
Posts: 1563
only if replaced by,
Sure, would you like to lose ability to close in and 6th man and nade assault to get it?
Or will learning to play be easier?
Posts: 1563
Sure, but those units with 65+ dps dont event have a grenade to begin with. They got standard frag grenade behind a fuel side tech and a version of flame nade behind tech and another 60 muni upgrade.
It's called trade off, you know.
Posts: 1563
an unit that dominates early game AND late game? doesn't sound op at all
Posts: 55
Why not?? No justification for that.
 | Playercard of Raxzero | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 3053
Since that seem to be trend, now days one could apply the same logic to Ass.Gren also instead of the weird 6 man upgrade.
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1563
Okay, let's give Lend Lease a Tiger/Tiger Ace equivalent and add a 4-Thompson squad inside the M5 HT call-in then, shall we? There is a justification for it and it's because Lend Lease have no late-game unlike Ass Gren doctrines.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
My point was that you constantly complain about thompsons any time they’re brought up and yet now you want to give assgrens the most similar axis equivalent of the thompson for some reason. IMO it’d just be a straight nerf to the assgrens too because they’d lose lategame survivability for marginally better midrange DPS, while wasting 60% of their weapons if they do decide to sit midrange since mp40s aren’t that good at midrange and they should be closing anyway. Doesn’t make much sense to me and I honestly like the 6th man in the lategame.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
My suggestion for assgrens is absolutely groundbreaking: They’re fine, leave them alone.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1563
My suggestion for assgrens is absolutely groundbreaking: They’re fine, leave them alone.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Axis bois be like:
Did you not say that they were trash.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 3260
Posts: 1563
Posts: 1563
Assault Grenadiers are fine.
Assault Sections might be too good against OKW, but if the double Sturmpioneer open worked on Assault Engineers I'm not too worried.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
No i'm pretty sure you said they were either trash or niche(can't remember which)
and definitely said they were worst of the assault infantries IYO.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
119 | ||
 |
|
|
96 | ||
 |
|
|
134 | ||
 |
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
