Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 20:16 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 16:08 PMNapalm Scout planes. and why it should be better than other AA? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 rework1 Dec 2020, 15:54 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 15:10 PMCrecer13 Yes, that's the point. Only a commander with side skirts could look around. the loader, gunner, radio operator, driver had side viewing devices, which were covered with side skirts. And later these side viewing devices were removed and even if the tank did not have a side skirt, other crew members could not help the commander in flank observation. The T-34 had viewing slots and rotating MK4 viewing devices, so the loader (and in the T-34-85 also a gunner) could help the commander in visibility That's a point, but on Ostfront that wasn't really needed, because a tank didn't operated alone, if so infantry was nearby. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 rework1 Dec 2020, 14:48 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 12:38 PMCrecer13 The German view from the tanks was degraded, especially the Pz.4, which had a very reduced view because of the side skirts. Whats the source? Commando-hatch was above skirts, so distance-view wasn't locked. Way more important was fighting room design, the reason why german vehicles had no angled armor (first). Reload, communication and working-space was key of german vehicles. Not saying german armor was good, but the battle effect was superior, even Pnz.III was able to counter early T34 with ease by simply punshing untill armor cracked. And with Pnz.IV-F2 they had a very effective answer. -> WarThunder doesn't reprecent T34 good. ^^ But all over, ingame T34 armor is wrong repecented, should be better. But diffictult to make it not OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 14:33 PMHannibal The numbers would help a lot though to check for it, since this is one of the very few instances where just calculating the numbers already tells a lot of the story (apart form turret rotation, but overall still very good) All over, most AA have problems with turret rotation, making their AA-capability full of statistic bias. Maybe Centaur is an exception. US FlaK-Truck suffers most. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 14:28 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 14:25 PMHannibal Do you know the numbers that other AA units have (USF AA halftrack, Ostwind, Centrain, Flak halftrack). Looking at ingame test, it looks fine. It still performs better than Ostwind. And all over, if Ostheer has 1 Ostwind and maybe 1 PnzIV they perform as a Quad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 14:00 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 12:24 PMTickTack Well, it's not just 'more' AA... it's the 'only' AA choice for RUS. It should be nerfed carefully as such. in 1vs1 it is ok, in larger team games there will be other AA too. It is perfect now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 12:04 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 05:19 AMmiragefla It's AA is also based on bringing a plane down per bullet it spits out with the Quad firing around 25 rounds at max range. That's why it demolishes aircraft at 10%. The nerf was perfect, the unit performs now like it should. For what do you need more AA as Allii? Germans air-attacks arn't that powerful and are still easy to counter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 rework1 Dec 2020, 11:30 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 19:50 PMgbem the T-34 had more armor than the panzer 4 G in real life in exchange for a worse gun and no cupola... this would make the unit kinda true to life while being balanced by requiring infantry support wherever it goes... I real-life T34 had very bad optics (acc.), very bad all-round view (ingame-view), bad communication-system (delayed response time) and bad engine lifetime BUT good pen and good frontal armor, because of bad soviet steel would be bad against high-explosives. Making T34 more realistic wouldn't be a buff, because 75mm 48 were very powerful... xD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback30 Nov 2020, 19:40 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 19:10 PMKiwiBirb Maybe grenadiers could be given stun grenades as default? This would help them protect MGs by stunning flanking squads and giving the mg time to re position. That is something I propose for years now... xD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:25 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 11:44 AMgunther09 lovely idea! promoting combined arms...feeding the character of the faction. Lovely. give it a try! +1 ^^ In: COH2 Balance