Can a Puma vetted up the whole game please scale better vs Jacksons/Churchills/T34/85s!
Absolutely it can. It has one of the very best support abilities as vet 1 that can do anything from stun to force team weapons to pack up and also gets panzer tac smoke. |
It's a stop gap unit that can scale via barrage. It's fine as is. Some units shine in a time period and then fall off, as long as they retain some usefulness after their golden age it's fine. Soviet t3 is full of units that you may get for one job and then when that's no longer feasible can do support. The T70 can cap and scout, the m5 can upgrade for AA And flank control and the su76 can bombard areas and help v tanks. It's a multirole assault gun, it can't be spectacular at any given task, a d especially not at its price point. |
Have you even used the mortar against mg42?
Like I see people regurgitate this, and just can't tell if they're playing the same game
I do. As a matter of fact it's always in my BO against Ost because I KNOW they are long range, static force (except Pgrens, who are easily zoned when unsupported) and quick smoke is absolutely irreplacible at taking aways OSTs strengths. It doesn't do so well against okw but hey they are designed to not have weaknesses so that's not really a good metric. |
I completely disagree with higher population for heavies. I'd argue that perhaps they need to be less generalist and have a lower population at a more specialized role than being various degrees of generalist and a huge population. Heavies (imo) should be a PART of your combined arms army, not necessarily the Centerpoint of it.
Imagine if the tiger lost some pop cap and some AOE but gained 5 or more range and become a sort of super panther instead of a large panzer. If the is-2×dropped some pop and some ROF meaning its cannon does a great job at all targets but doesn't have the DPS to hold the line by itself and needs super SU85S or cheap t34s to support it. |
I can go even further. I want to play with a team and against teams ranked 20 and below, and I don't want to get kicked for building stupid build orders. This includes not giving the enemy free fuel so they can rush out brumbars, Panthers, p4's, or pwerfers. I also would like to have more tools so early combined arms is an option.
If you don't want to get base r8ped, I would suggest building something OTHER than teamweapons.
Tools that will help negate the enemy's advantage of the best MG in game? Things like a t0 mortar? Smoke is a very powerful tool, if you know there is going to be an MG, it's powerful being able to force that to not work. |
If your forced your opponent to babysit a MG42, that's also a victory.
I don't think you understand. I want to obliterate their entire army instantly and anything short of that is useless! It doesn't matter if the enemy is using combined arms, I don't want to because any counterplay they apply makes me playing completely irrelevant! |
Yeah, just changing the StuG and Puma versions to "Target Gunners" would get the job done to highlight the important difference (stops only vehicles' ability to damage, not move).
Puma should probably be replaced with the okw puma's "aimed shot" instead imo.
But +1 for the StuG name change |
I think simply name changes are necessary. The multiple different effects depending on the unit but same name makes the game very complex for newer players |
Just had an idea here. You know how the old Kuble had to be stationary for a few seconds before it suppressed? What if the maxim worked kinda like that?
If it had to be static for a few seconds to start properly suppressing we fix the issue of attack move maxims. It could still be used as an attack MG that can deal damage but if set up properly in wait it can also stop an attack.
Idk... I'm trying.... |
Calm your biased ass tits man. They said MULTIPLE TIMES that this is a trial run and that the only reason it was both axis factions is because the new commanders both had tigers in them and were thus in scope. What's more, if you pull your biased head out of your whining ass you'll notice that the allied TDs have the best chance of standing against axis armour making it actually best case scenario.
I wait with bated breath for the day that the might CODGUY makes a post that isn't just whining drivel about how OP the axis are. I'll immediately look up to see if there are pigs flying and drop a grand on the leafs winning the cup. |