Someone could say that it was a nerf, not a buff..
Jackson and FF have 200damage (FF has 200, right?) + turret.
JPIV has armor and bonus HP and camo.
SU85 has only sight but that's hardly bonus since JP with vet 2 also has it without any penalties
Ff is 160 at vet 3 240 |
well i think the price in fuel is fine maybe some more mp but don't compare it to ost p4 dat shit is largely overpriced compare it to okw p4 it has less armor and no mg on top but more hp and pen i think but is doc |
would changing the aim time and cooldown to decent time but making the damage to infantry to 12-14
and changing the button to turret lock/disable and slow the tank like right now be ok ? |
Why are we making Guards better? Shock troops already see minimal play, we don't need to make Guards the 100% better call in. we are not making them better at anti inf we are just trying to fix their at role losing vs luch while using button in cover should not happen |
According to price, Guards should be ultimate squad.
390MP + 75ammo. Only Obers are similar to Gurd with 400MP + 60ammo.
Yet I hardly call Guards the best ling range infantry.
....... They cost 330 ........ |
|
the t34/85 is a bit too cheap since the last patched buffed the mg on the t34/85.
I wouldn't say it's broken, but it should be made a bit more expensive, something like 385mp 135fuel.
Ssssshhhhhh mod close quick no one shall know my secret strat make it pass under the radar ssssshhhhh |
Different? If you mean different from the Boys AT rifle and the German Panzerbusche then yes, a bit, if you mean from the Polish variant, then no, it was entirely copied, like the PPSh, by MissCommissar's "glorious" Soviets.
Ah, thought it was Polish, whatever, still copied.
I meant boys at rifle and conscripts
Still need better aim time , cool down and fix button ability to good lvl or another upgrade for guard to get 2 other ptrs for guard for 100 mun |
i think 27 is for only agaist inf. isnt vehicle damage like 40? not great but anyway.
ptrs dont miss though... if i am correct. so i think that can be the argument for its aim time. i really do not think PTRS should be more effective against heavier vehicles.
wasn't vs inf only 10-17 ? 40 is still not very much 2 pen hit = 80 damage with 85 pen wich is not soo bad but the take aim and cd combined are too much I think it take less for a bazoka to fire another volley |
Just a little note, the PTRS is not only used by Guards but by Cons from the Tank Hunter tactics commander as well, but buffing it would mean you would also need to buff the German and British equivalents to the same levels so it's fair to everybody SINCE they're basically the same thing, all are mostly firing a .55 cal round.
Fun fact, the Soviet PTRS and PDRS are actually copied from a Finnish weapon, like the PPSh.
And yes I know that the Soviets are the main users of Anti-Tank rifles and that it's their only hand-held AT weapon compared to other Armies but having the British Tank Hunter Section is the Brits' only way of fighting early light vehicles because of the PIAT's inaccuracy while Idk Relic might decide to add a new German squad that uses the German Panzerbusche AT Rifle? For example a Panzerjager squad to the OKW that can upgrade to a single (or double) Shreck(s) that come by default with the AT rifle tho.
And buffing the PTRS entitiy also buffs the Con ones, not just the Guard ones. from my knowledge the ptrs are different what I'm talking about is the take aim time and the button ability |