Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: [TEST] Best Long Range Anti Infantry Unit14 Mar 2019, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2019, 08:42 AMVipper Not according to Cruzz, Vickers has better stat at long range a bit worse at sort. In addition bren are limited to 1 for R.E. Do you mean engineers or heavy engineers? As for Penals so much for the durability argument if they can beat Ranger one of the most durable squads. are u sure about that ? didn't they revert the change when they nerfed bren ? just yesterday i m quite sure i put 2 bren on RE In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The IS-2: What do we do with it?14 Mar 2019, 11:25 AM it still has 40 range In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind Light Vehicle Hunter13 Mar 2019, 22:30 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 21:41 PMKatitof Except it never was. i mean historically, anything without armor would get shredded In: COH2 Balance
Thread: did shock troops need the buff?13 Mar 2019, 21:24 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 20:51 PMShadowLinkX37 Pretty sure that'll be the 3 kar98s at 16 damage a shot, since the scoped G43 can hit shit at that range. it makes up with faster reload and fire time In: COH2 Balance
Thread: did shock troops need the buff?13 Mar 2019, 20:35 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 20:11 PMShadowLinkX37 I'd say that makes them map dependant than blatantly OP. JLI might be OP, but on south KFS around all the hedges you can close in on them easily. Same is true for shocks, A-move LMG grens/obers don't matter in CQC areas jli are still op close range too as the 75%crit is too strong In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostwind Light Vehicle Hunter13 Mar 2019, 20:18 PM well it was supposed to be light that from the start In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 13 Mar 2019, 13:50 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 12:48 PMSuperHansFan 5man, hammer, heavy sappers upgrade aren't free either so what's your point? It's entirely compatible to OKW sturms and mech repair. I use panther here as an example because with the FF tracking if another tank gets a shot off it can track a single shot at 60 range for a few seconds. Which is perfectly ok, but some vehicles like command panther self spotting and can shoot at max range 100% of the time anyway. So in the grand scheme of things doesn't make hammer worth the 50f and lockout of repair+church. Please give me your reasons why you think hammer is not a dead tech choice, because I've not seen the likes of Hans pick it in months. This is despite such players building fireflies... panther has only 50 range and heavy sapper repair faster than SP In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 13 Mar 2019, 13:46 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 12:36 PMSuperHansFan JP makes up for low pen with good accuracy and spitting out great RoF. Also you forget outside of Pershing and is-2 there's not really anything it can struggle to pen anyway. Churchill's while they will bounce the odd shot are just big vet sponges for the jp. Jackson I would say is a poor comparison, it's mobile, not 60 range and the turret doesn't move so slow. I think the firefly has a one armed dwarf cranking the turret, so it fairs a bit better on urban maps than FF or JP comet, kv1 jackson has 60 range and ff is mobile too it's just not as fast In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 13 Mar 2019, 12:32 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 12:31 PMSuperHansFan Pretty sure sturms repair faster with vet? But then you also have the mech truck pios. Brits can struggle to keep up with that without a couple heavy sapper. Hammer tracking is nice but it's no 55 range LoS like on a command panther. Hammer is dead in current meta for a reason they nerfed repair speed like 2 patches ago, the command panther is form a commander get valentine if u want line of sight, and the mech pios are not free In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 13 Mar 2019, 12:28 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 11:50 AMSuperHansFan I'm of the opinion it performs the same as a jagdpanzer, just the JP comes stock with good DPS and gets defensive vet (17 target size+vet make it a pain to kill even chasing with meds). FF gets offensive vet and lacks DPS but a tiny bit more mobility. Yet jp is cheaper and less popcap, imo this is the issue. Just a small price drop so they're at the same level. It's also worth mentioning war speed and tracking are locked in a dead tech tier because the comet is a waste of fuel. I think if hammer wasn't so "meh" people would feel a bit better for spending 440mp 155f+muni on the firefly. As it stands noone us going to lock themselves out of the Churchill and OKW repair speeds just for the nerfed war speed and satchel charges. i believe the m36 fits better as they have similar dps and pen while the jp has lower pen and no turret so no don't compare price to it, it's like comparing the okw p4 to the Sherman and saying okw p4 needs to cost less In: COH2 Balance