Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: Do you think cons deserve some nondoc AI upgrade ? 28 Mar 2019, 20:48 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 20:41 PMKatitof Umm, you do realize grens START with 0.91 rec acc and PGs START with 0.8? Just asking. i know, the 0.9 or 0.95 would just let them avoid the random wipes as they are 4 men, and yes it would improve their durability in combat too, maybe nerf vet RA but no more random wipes In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 17 Pounder vs Jagdtiger28 Mar 2019, 20:16 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 20:07 PMShadowLinkX37 It was, till it caused problems outranging the 17pdr. Then lowered to 78 same patch as it got 320->300 damage. u sure ? cruzz stats says 80 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you think cons deserve some nondoc AI upgrade ? 28 Mar 2019, 20:13 PM want to fix cons ? give them at tier 4 free upgrade for 3 guard rifle (if u are asking why not STV ask the mod team why they put them in doc) but so ost should get a 0.9-0.95 reduced damage on PG and gren at tier 4 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Do you think cons deserve some nondoc AI upgrade ? 26 Mar 2019, 18:41 PM as i always said cons gets non doc upgrade when ost get 5 man non doc upgrade In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback25 Mar 2019, 22:16 PM yea kat don't use adominem or "i beat u one time" u dont even know if ur opponent has 100 ms while he plays (i have 1.5-2 second lag for example) In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback25 Mar 2019, 19:25 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 19:01 PMelchino7 I missed that part. From what i remembered that's how cruzz described how it works and from personal test (i only did a test in the past to see how far away it could hit and if it hit different squads) From what i read, Redterror and Mr Smith have completely different test results. One is based more in a model vs model and the other on a squad level. Nothing conclusive. i remember either on cruzz thread or somewhere else in this site someone made a mod with and without focus fire weapon to see the difference with cheat mod on so he could see if damage was dealt and found that it did nothing In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback25 Mar 2019, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 16:04 PMelchino7 Reminder that STG have a special property called focus fire. This makes this types of weapons to do "hidden" damage with re-rolls on miss shots. Besides the point been if the upgrade is worthy or not for SU, but if it would cause any issues with other faction units. CE get no RA and remain to be a 4 man squad. They are squishy as they can be and i can't remember the reinforce cost atm. I would love seeing cast of top level games on 2v2 "abusing" this kinds of combinations cause it seems a bit too far fetched at the moment. i thought we debunked this in the cruzz thread In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback23 Mar 2019, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2019, 16:33 PMVipper As far AT weapon on P.F. goes if ahead I would suggest they get an upgrade that allows them to get 2 panzerfausts as weapons not snares with bazooka characteristics. These weapons could have to option be put away similar to SP minesweeper. One has to keep in mind that buff like these in P.F. will make JT allot harder to counter thou since it will have good support from AT infatry. From a thematic point of view Panzer Fusiliers are more of reckon troops and double shreck feel rather odd on them. this In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback22 Mar 2019, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2019, 13:32 PMKatitof Old volks had 80% of gren DPS without shreck. as i said a bit less In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback22 Mar 2019, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2019, 13:45 PMWingZero I would prefer flame throwers on RE than Rifle nades. maybe exchange the rifle nade with rifle man company for flame thrower In: Lobby