Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback22 Mar 2019, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2019, 21:44 PMaddvaluejack 1 Schrecks should lock G43 upgrade, too. 4 * Fusillier K98r only have similar DPS as 3 * Grenadier K98r. that's more than enough to be strong, OG volks had a bit less dps than greens with shrek and were op In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback21 Mar 2019, 21:38 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2019, 19:44 PMaddvaluejack 250MP squad can equip double schrecks... I think we should change it to 60/70 munition for one schreck (take on weapon slot). no that would make them op, with 2 shrek they forfeit their ai power, PG and bills were OP cause they kept their AI power with just one shrek In: Lobby
Thread: New usf commander and new soviet commander(OP)21 Mar 2019, 12:47 PM how about the actual dozzer ? more hp and better AI gun rifle nades are good but maybe give it 40 range ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 15:19 PM hell OST lacks any sort of light tank In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2019, 15:15 PMkingdun3284 That is not an argument, that is a fact. My argument have been stated clearly at #1. You may challenge me for not having any data to support how important of a mobile artillery for USF in team game which should be able to shown by the use rate and win rate of infantry company in team game. But I can't, so I can only tell by experience just like you all. by ur logic one can do the same for each doc unit, i mean USF has no heavy tank does it need pershing stock ? do ukf need land matrees /sexton stock ? do okw need jli jagdtiger lefh stock ? do soviet need kv1 isu is2 stock ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 15:12 PM Propose argument > no i don't like it, it's invalid tell me would u like the world to tell ya "yes u are right we should all only play USF give them nukes please" ? Every time someone brings a similar situation for other faction u just deny it u are just a kid go play vs easy AI if multiplayer is too hard btw at some point if u keep making troll thread u are gonna get banned In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 15:09 PM Guys u still replying ? This is a full-blown troll if a thread like this was for axis it would have been nuked the moment it was created op is full of shit and wants to play only USF and is not even good enough to play with them In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2019, 12:11 PMkingdun3284 Again, no support for your argument. Source please for the win rate you claimed. Bug is welcomed in Bug Report section, not here. I prefer replacing scott with this if you ask and if it is needed can we replace the kubel with ostwind ? or replace the mortar pits with land mattress it would lead to much more options In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 11:18 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2019, 01:29 AMkingdun3284 Would you mind explaining your question in more detail? 1. What to remove? 2. Why do you remove? cause This would be a straight up buff for a faction with good win rate and right now even op thanks to the Jeep bug So u would need to remove something from the faction or it would just make them op In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Team game] USF needs non doctrinal mobile artillery16 Mar 2019, 11:15 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2019, 07:37 AMkingdun3284 That's OKW which have been no weakness and everything available to them. again they don’t have a sniper or mortars, a reinforce mobile platform , or a generalists LT And they do have weakness, play them and u will see In: COH2 Balance