Kuble is cheaper and can cap. Seems reasonable to be less combat proficient.
UC can be upgraded and has more armor, and move units, etc
i think a bit of a buff close range is warranted to kubel
|
I think it would be nice if Kubel got some adjustments to its accuracy since it heavily relies on being stationary.
The Universal Carrier has overall better stationary accuracy and accuracy on the move altogether, meaning higher DPS.
Kubel should get some improvements on accuracy (only while stationary), especially at range, it is quite poor its stats at the moment.
Not too important, yet a change I am looking forward to. i still find it funny that the UC deal more damage at max range then kubel at 0 range |
or u can keep the current damage and make it have the same set up time as other mgs ? right now is a bit faster
without a fast set up time the maxim can suppress and not be spammed and a moved |
Machine guns have one job: inflicting suppression on enemy units.
The HMGs that do this in one burst (MG42, MG34, .50 cal, DHSK) are good. The HMGs that do not (Vickers and Maxim) are trash, and the factions that can build them spam mainlines instead because their HMG is unfit for purpose.
Give it good suppression, cut its damage however far you need to to balance that out.
Instant workable HMG. no need to nerf the damage just make it have slower set up time, so u can't a move it |
What do you mean "both roles"? It still can't fight vehicles. The mg42 can suppress infantry and kill light vehicles, but you have no problem with that
both role i mean dps moving unit and suppression stationary |
Why are you freaking out over everyone else's ideas except yours?
making an mg have both roles will make it either spammable or UP, we have the perfect example, pupppchen, which was cheesy and had to fill 2 roles |
It's not the same argument at all. Grens don't suck. The maxim does
And ost t1 is not a choice the same as soviet t1 vs t2. Just stop
and why the fuck do u think im asking for suppression buff ?
btw tier 1 is a choice, u can use doc units, ukf tier 2 is not a choice, su tier 3 is not a choice |
Can you make a single point without complaining about axis? You need to stop calling out Codguy while you maintain this level of bias, its massively hypocritical
.... so literally using the same argument someone else used is being a fan boy ?
"None of the other main inf rely on a tech choice. Except the penals, which sure does differ quite a lot from other main inf "
do u see now or do need to go to ur safe space ? |
Clearly, we want free buffs for ostheer. Okay
player pick the doc and don't use the unit, it's not free buffs |
I repeat to everyone. This is an elite infantry, on the 5th vet they get from 0.8 to 0.47 Tagget size. The allies have no elite infantry with a target size of 0.5. And even 0.6.
If you want a Jagers for 2 cp, then adjust the cost with its performance and target size. This is not just grenadiers with g43. You of course are very gynius with such requests.
dude, u got the wrong unit, this is about the jager of the osther |