Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion9 Jan 2021, 21:21 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2021, 20:26 PMthedarkarmadillo the discussion about jp4 getting its mostly useless first strike buffed, and later on a genral Passover for all vet is good, comparing the jp4 and su76 though is a joke, even if they have similar vet bonus at the moment. i did not tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion9 Jan 2021, 20:24 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2021, 20:11 PMthedarkarmadillo +1 TO VET OVERHAUL -1 TO COMPARING THE JP4 TO THE SU76... ???? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion9 Jan 2021, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2021, 14:48 PMelchino7 He is implying the boost you suggest is too strong. Increasing the pen/accuracy more is fine, not dmg. Specially when cautious movement defensive perks have never been fixed. well the current + 25% damage is useless i don't mind if it increased the reload further instead of damage too and comes way too late just so people understand why the 25% damage is useless it's 40 more damage so in 90% of the cases vs tanks it does nothing as they generally hit multiple of 160 this is especially relevant vs medium tanks which is supposed to counter at 50% it would be + 80 damage so if u actually have 2 raketen or 2 jp4 u actually would take 1 less shoot to kill if they both reach the required vet and as i said above i don't mind if it's changed to a reload bonus so it actually does something insated of a token bonus In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion9 Jan 2021, 13:19 PM ???? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion9 Jan 2021, 02:10 AM mhh honestly speaking , the JP4 does not need that many changes, 1 like elchino said bringing it at tier 4 base should see it more usable to counter a fast medium, 2 buff the first stike bonus to actually do something: from 25% to 50% too pen,dmg and acc the unit has 0 pen buff and the reload is very similar to the su 85, so making first stike bonus actually useful would not be a bad idea btw the vet req should be brought in line with su 85 cause if u see them they are basically the 3 vet of the su 85 divided in 5 but like double the vet req and they should reshufle the bonus liek this 1 Unlocks the "Cautious Movement" ability. 2 +160 additional healthpoints. +20% accuracy. 3 For first shot fired out of camouflage: +50% damage. +50% accuracy. +50% penetration. 4 +20% rotation speed. +20% maximum speed. +10% reload speed. 5 +15% reload speed. +15% accuracy. btw don't forget staggered vet bonus are less cumulative than 1 big one (30% cd > 20%+10% cd) cause math In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion2 Jan 2021, 01:19 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2021, 15:15 PMSander93 A little spoiler for y'all (Don't mind the UI icons they haven't been updated yet) finally the technology is there, thanks u guys In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nading bunkers and emplacement18 Dec 2020, 16:36 PM while it could as well be removed , what is the problem ? panzrfaust does 100 damage and nades does 80 , if u are using it vs bunkers pen does not matters so u can just chuck nades too , u lose 20 damage but it has more range + arc if u want to see cons and pros vs bunkers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion5 Dec 2020, 16:55 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2020, 01:56 AMLatch AT gun was max range!?! lol 17 seconds in, you call that max range? Nice to see your biases are still stronk! did u see the video ? the at gun was out of the screen when it missed unless u mean the pupchen which has 10 target size ? if so it's really irrelevant, at weapons have at max 0.08 acc so even at that it would always have a chance to miss (10x0.08= 80% to hit) in the video specifically that at gun had between 0.05 and 0.06 acc so around 50% to miss In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion5 Dec 2020, 01:22 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2020, 00:43 AMLatch Exactly, so if that is the case... Mega buffs for the Churchil incoming? And the AT guns? Churchill was moving tho panther was not at gun was max range not close In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion4 Dec 2020, 22:25 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2020, 13:37 PMSander93 I can't speak for the others, but I think the choice between the Panther and the Jagdpanzer IV / StuG is mostly a player preference and/or map/situation dependant. One isn't necessarily better/worse than the other against similar targets. I'd say all of them perform roughly similar against most targets at the moment. The JP4 has the range and DPM advantage, the StuG has the cost effectiveness advantage (get two for 1 Panther) and the Panther has the generalist/brawler advantage. The Panther however, is a mix of mostly mediocre characteristics. It has mediocre DPM, mediocre accuracy, kinda mediocre pen (for an AT vehicle), good but not fantastic mobility, held together with high durability. The complete package is good, but any one of those aspects on its own isn't anything to write home about. It is supposed to expose itself though, mostly by diving, where the current accuracy is often not adequate and it makes dives/attacks more risky than they should be. That is why it is being buffed slightly. That being said, the accuracy buff is being toned down in V2. And if it turns out that the Panther with increased accuracy becomes too good, then we can nerf something else about it later. how about making the moving acc 60-75% ? at least stationary it would not hit target it's not supposed if u simply buff the MA instead In: COH2 Balance