Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch2 Oct 2018, 08:25 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2018, 06:02 AMOsinyagov Only for smoke grenade. I won‘t say anything, if cavalrly riflemen have Garand as a weapon. Cap and Leut have Garands in the their squads, so nothing strange. What about major...well... it can be solved in two ways: 1. Change Carbines on Garands. With same stats if you worry this change makes him OP 2. Remove this abillity for major Or change the weapon to smoke grenade instead of rifle grenade. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch2 Oct 2018, 08:23 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2018, 01:06 AMLoopDloop Stormtroopers can be used much more actively and offensively since they have a far and away superior camouflage to ambush camo pgrens. It’s much easier to sneak behind enemy lines with stormtroopers or commandos than ambush camo pgrens because as soon as pgrens take a step out of camo they are revealed. This opens up a wealth of possibilities for more aggressive and offensive ambushes and flanking through camo to get at support weapons or low health squads without he enemy even realizing. Ambush Camouflage (Affects Storm, Jaeger Infantry and Encirclement) * Renamed Ambush Training * Camouflage cost from 30 to 20. * Camouflage now works when moving. Requires all squad members to be in cover. * Infantry can now use the Sprint ability. No upgrade required. Snipers and weapon teams cannot sprint. Again it is not about who can do it better. PGs can sprint and can move while cloaked, that also allows them to move to flank undetected. The units overlap. It is as simple as that and that is why they need to bring something extra to the table like the anti cashes capability. In: Lobby
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know2 Oct 2018, 00:19 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2018, 00:09 AMShadowLinkX37 Is that right? Far accuracy has a 0.92 hit percentage against a target size of 1 where near goes to 0.345? Who thinks of this.... This is weapon that work similar to sniper rifle and it makes perfect sense. Think of it like this if the scoped rifle had better DPS close than far it would cut down most infantries that managed to close in. The same reversed DPS curve is used also by LMG for the exact same reason. Weapon profiles where developed in combination with relative positioning in order to shift damage ratio according to favorable range. That in some cases mean that weapon that are good long range have to be worse in close range. The only problem in this case is that Pathfinders can equip bars. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Do volks need some nerf? If so, how?1 Oct 2018, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 21:14 PMTheGentlemenTroll Would Sov be the allied benchmark then since both OKW and OST have around a 50% winrate? It is far simpler to use one benchmark and not two. First one decides how strong Ostheer (as an example) need to be. Then one balances all allied faction vs Ostheer. Finally one balance OKW vs all allied factions. Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 21:14 PMTheGentlemenTroll Also I feel like if you fix Mobile Defense (which is happening next patch right?) OST will be very balanced. Similarly I find SOV and OKW balanced well enough to not need sweeping adjustments. UKF and USF have issues hopefully fixed soon/eventually. Well imo there some Commanders that are problematic have access to a combination of abilities that they should not have like powerful infantry weapon upgrades, super heavy tanks and powerful off map. I will bring 2 as an example there others: Jaeger Armor Doctrine Combining Reconnaissance Overflight/Stuka Bombing Strike/Elefant Tank Destroyer. This combination should not be allowed. Lightning War Doctrine Combining Jaeger Light Infantry/Stuka Close Air Support/Tiger Tank This combination should not be allowed. On their own this abilities might be balanced but the combination is not. About mobile defense, I am not sure if the "fix" is in the right direction since AI and AT call-in vehicles like the Puma and C.PzIV again should not be allowed to be in the same commander. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know1 Oct 2018, 23:20 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 19:57 PMFK9DD Hey,what is the current stats for pathfinders? interested in 2 scoped rifles,acc and firerate m1 scoped Garand Accuracy near 0.345 Accuracy mid 0.575 Accuracy far 0.92 Cooldown time near 0.38 - 0.75 Cooldown time mid 0.47 - 0.94 Cooldown time far 0.56 - 1.13 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch1 Oct 2018, 23:16 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 22:25 PMLoopDloop Stormtroopers still have the better camouflage that lets them leave cover... Regardless which unit can do it better St.T or Camo Pg, they simply overlap in the ambush role. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch1 Oct 2018, 23:12 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 18:34 PMTiger Baron Wait with the Valentine becoming a mini-Churchill is it going to keep it's Sexton Victor Target? And yeah I also thought about a Sherman/M10 duo or separate vehicles being added to Tac Support instead of the Croc as well, maybe the Brits could use the M10 since the Firefly is a bit meh right now? But it still doesn't answer the question what to replace it with in Royal Artillery, the USF M21 Mortar HT maybe. The mortar HT was not used by British forces in WW II as far as I know. One idea would be for the Valentine to lose barrage and spotting and to be have clear role either as light tank or medium tank or infantry support tank. Once that is shuttle the unit in Royal artillery could have an upgrade available to upgrade to Forward observer Tank gaining abilities that allow it to synergies with sexton. The trade of would be to lose some of its damage similar to command vehicle. The upgrade should also be limited to 1. The same Valentine could also become available to Tactical support without the FO upgrade and become a good candidate for a command vehicle. M-10, Shermans or Sherman dozers could also work for Tactical support. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch1 Oct 2018, 17:39 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 17:37 PMTiger Baron Agreed but then what's the point of it being in the Artillery doctrine? The synergy with sexton? The option to stay lower tech so one can call in Sexton earlier? I would actually add it to tactical support instead of croc so tactical support had a decent command vehicle, instead of making croc one of the most common UKF abilities. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch1 Oct 2018, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 17:06 PMmadin2 But its still disappointing it need some additional Buff It need a redesign not buffs. The unit is simply extremely mobile. The unit has too much armor and HP for light vehicle, but little damage, come too early, has too low armor and HP and it is way to mobile for medium tank. In other words it suffers from an identity crises and id should be redesigned with specific role in mind. Imo it should be slow and well armored acting more like mini Churchill, sine it was a infantry support tank in reality. It would also benefit the unit if the barrage ability was an upgrade and limited to 1, since then the unit could be balance in 2 separate versions with and without the Sexton synergy. In: Lobby
Thread: "balancing" discussions are ALL pointless1 Oct 2018, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 15:13 PMIncendiaryRounds Ah, I knew you'd come knocking Jae. Your stormtrooper idea was BEYOND BAD. I HAD to call u out on it... I would suggest that we separate balance issues from personal issues, a suggestion should be judged only on the basis of weather it improves the game or it makes it worse. The identity of the person proposing it should be irrelevant, else you end up with flame wars and you lose focus. In: COH2 Balance