Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update7 Dec 2016, 17:03 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2016, 16:57 PMImagelessbean One other thing, can the USF rifle nade frequently bugging out and not firing be fixed? It is annoying that there is basically little to no animation for the action already. this might have to do with the minimum range of the AT rifle grenade that should be removed from all rifle AT grenades including PF. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update7 Dec 2016, 17:01 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2016, 16:41 PM__deleted__ Main difference between guards and penals is this one: The problem lies with the AI power Penal have without the PTRS... Patch difference from live flamer removed, Xp value increase, vet 3 armor decreased. All this have little impact on the initial punch of the unit thus the problem remains, just replace guards with AT partisans or PTRS conscripts or PTRS conscripts and the blobbing remain the same... It would be a different story if Penal come out already equipped with PTRS but now they are about the same spot as before with the added option to upgrade to PTRS if and when they like, I would actually call that buff from live and not nerf since they can stay relevant for even in later stages of the game... in addtion "Penal Battalion To continue our attempts at finding a good fit for Penals in Soviet teching, we are going to trial a second version of Penal squad. This time, we are restoring part of their veterancy so that Penals excel as hard-hitting long-range skirmishers, which will allow them to defend against advancing short-range squads." If the role of Penals is long range skirmishers they should be equipped by bolt action rifles and lmg and not semi auto. In addition the only sort range infantry is axis side is pio and the doctrinal assault grenadiers so there is little point in having them.... In: Lobby
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV7 Dec 2016, 15:48 PM The values of interest here are: Penetration/damage/ deflection damage Penetration should go down for "medium tank" destroyers Su-76, stug, M10. Damage of firefly/M36 need to go down vs medium tanks(including panther) Defection damage from hand held weapon need to down or completely removed vs medium tanks (including panther) Chance to hit Accuracy/target size vs medium tanks need to be adjusted so that heavy tank destroy have a good chance to miss these targets at max range... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update7 Dec 2016, 14:12 PM "Puma (LIGHT VEHICLES) Aimed shot was being used less for its utility and more for its guaranteed ability to wipe infantry on retreat. This gave the Puma too much anti infantry capability for something designed to be anti vehicle, thus, aimed shot can no longer target infantry." Since aim shot has been nerfed considerably, I would suggest reduce or remove the time of aiming the shot. In addition I would suggest using target tables to reduce the damage of Centaur vs Puma since Puma is almost useless against it although it should be a valid pray for it. About the wasp I would recommend reducing the Aplha damage for more DOT damage, and use target table to reduce damage from 222 so it does not die to singe burst (one shoted). Same goes for AA emplacement vs all light vehicles/tanks In: Lobby
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV5 Dec 2016, 12:36 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2016, 12:32 PMIron Emperor So increase pen and lower the other medium tanks) is what people vote for. To me this seems the best to do You should had included lower the efficiency of its counters as a voting option... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV5 Dec 2016, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2016, 05:24 AMzerocoh That would be a massive nerf actually. The HE AP round for Sherman is not a draw back for Sherman but a Bonus ability. The AP round already has good AI properties. So having AP/HE similar to Sherman is not nerf, it only if it implement like ISU-152... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update5 Dec 2016, 09:23 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2016, 08:00 AMMr.Smith The speed penalty is what prevents the command vehicle from being useful. However, without the speed penalty, and without an appropriate penalty of its own the AVRE will become the next no-brainer UC-style choice. Yes but the Avre is at least a CP 12 unit so spamming planes will be available when lot of AA option are present and with 100% penalty on reload it will fire every 8 secs creatly reducing the Power of the vehicle... With Speed lower than 4 (as with all vehicles) the unit is difficult to be useful since it can not keep up even with infantry. As all aura it would be better if they scaled with veterancy similar to command Panther... In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update4 Dec 2016, 23:45 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2016, 23:37 PMBartonPL actually, i believe that command vehicle should have some boosts and nerfs on tank itself, i suggest to make: It does.... Aura to others units: -30% Received Accuracy, +35% accuracy, -30% reload, -30% cool-down, -25% commander ability recharge time. Penalties to commanding vehicle: -50% speed, +100% reload, +100% cool-down, -50% accuracy, +100% received accuracy. The speed penalty is actually the thing that breaks although a Churchill with a max of Speed 2 is a rather funny thing to watch... In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update4 Dec 2016, 23:33 PM Once more Command vehicle penalties simply need to go down abit. Simply make the speed penalty to turn max speed to 4 (so it can move at the same speed as its supporting infantry) for any vehicle that is turned into a command vehicles and reduce or remove the received accuracy... The command vehicles provides far more than "free" recon and it does cost 75 mu and a vehicle to begin with (so its no that free)... In: Lobby
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV4 Dec 2016, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2016, 15:06 PMZombiFrancis I think it's more important to differentiate turreted tanks from assault guns than whether or not they are considered 'medium' or 'heavy'. The term medium or heavy is in reference to the Vehicles they are designed to counter and not the properties of the unit itself. A "medium tank destroyer" is designed to perform better at countering "medium tank" regardless of the "weight" of the unit itself. In the same manner a "heavy tank destroyer" is designed to perform better at countering heavy/super heavy tanks. In: COH2 Balance