Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Lol shocks.12 Feb 2017, 13:24 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2017, 13:02 PMRedT3rror You are right when the total hit chance surpasses the value 1, which is very rare though. Hit chance = (weapon accuracymodifiersreceived accuracy) If you think hit chances in cqb are usually 1, you are mistaken. Try red cover as I mentioned with X125% accuracy modifier in many cases. (edited) Shock troops firing on obers range close: Hit chance 0.860.7= 0.60 Damage chance 0.60 Ober K98 firing on Shocks range close: Hit chance 0.921= 0.92 damage chance 0.92*1/1.5= 0.61 (edited after request from moderator) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lol shocks.12 Feb 2017, 12:13 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2017, 11:09 AMRedT3rror You are mistaken. Armor = received accuracy if the AP value is 1. However, armor becomes less effective as soon as the AP value increases (AP rounds, .50cal, Flak, etc.) And guess what, the majority of small arms weapon have penetration of 1. In addition at point blank range vetted unit and/or on red cover most weapons have enough accuracy to have close to 100% chance to hit removing most protection from smaller target size, shock on the other hand with their armor still enjoin around 66% protection from it. (edited to make it more clear) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pz.Kpfw. VI - Tiger12 Feb 2017, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2017, 10:59 AMSmaug the tank itself is great, but once damaged, pios take ages to repair it. By comparison a damaged KT can return to combat very quickly. So can the pershing, comet and other tanks. Soviets and Ost need a repair speed buff. Soviets have other doctrinal repair options also, but ost have nothing but expensive pios (then soviets engies) and lowest repair speed. Imo it the WFA engineer repair speed that need to be reduced. In addition sweeper should provide repair/built speed but be mutually exclusive with weapons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lol shocks.12 Feb 2017, 11:00 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2017, 20:24 PMAustralian Magic They are not that bad, tho rec. acc > armor but they could use a grenade buff. Received accuracy is better than armor? seriously? Armor is much better than received accuracy In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the state of Panzer 4 on the Winter Balance Patch11 Feb 2017, 12:33 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2017, 12:17 PM__deleted__ They have their own concept very similar. Both cost 80 fuel and both are disigned to pack hunting. You cannot fight axis tanks with them head on, you must create pack of them, flank and kill tank from behind. Only difference between them is that t34/76 have somewhat AI but is slower 1) T34/76 has far better AI with 2 mg and gun that can kill infantry 2) M10 gets AP round that can penetrate enemy vehicles frontally They are different units in different factions, with different roles and different teching. As you pointed out the only common factor is both units can be spammed... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is the state of Panzer 4 on the Winter Balance Patch11 Feb 2017, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2017, 11:41 AM__deleted__ If it won´t be able to crush, it will just shittier version of t34/76 that is call-inable and performs better against tanks in direct combat without flanking (you should avoid direct combat with both of them) How does a TD compare with a Tank? How does a unit requiring T4 tech compare with CP 8 unit? there is very litle common with t34/76 and the m10 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is the state of Panzer 4 on the Winter Balance Patch11 Feb 2017, 09:37 AM In the beginning Axis armor was designed to be superior and thus more expensive due to higher armor. Now most Allied AT is buffed to levels that make that armor pointless. A Su-76 has around 60% to penetrate a Tiger frontally at range 60. Tank battle/TD battle need to be redesigned. All allied AT weapons should no designed with countering the KT in mind. If the KT is a problem then it should either some units should have bones against it or be nerfed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht Infantry in WBP till 1.810 Feb 2017, 15:17 PM Toning down WFA infantry is to be inline with EFA infantry is imo better solution. the longer fight last the more tactical and less rng they are. Same goes for Axis Tanks. It the Allied tank/TDs that need to toned down and not the axis tank that need to be buffed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht Infantry in WBP till 1.89 Feb 2017, 16:29 PM I am not sure why people complain so much about scope. Sweeping changes are very difficult to get right and some times rather difficult to figure out what went wrong. The light vehicles changes alone are enough to sift balance and may need more tweaking. A re-balance of early infantry needs to be made at some point thou and a Tank/TD overhaul also. First priority imo should still be veterancy abilities and bonuses. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some QoL suggestions8 Feb 2017, 16:45 PM I would like to see the reverse button become a toggle. Click to it once and the unit moves reversing. In: Lobby