Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 10:27 AMKatitof And your point is incorrect. P4 is as solid as any other med tank, with its own weaknesses and strengths. Plus, you know very well how disgustingly overpowered StuG is at AT, yet it did not made allied med tanks obsolete, despite being able to 1v1 literally all of them with exception of doctrinal ones. If StuG doesn't make allied meds obsolete when it shows up, then same applies for axis armor when allied TDs show up - if you think otherwise, maybe its time to reconsider how you play against them, ESPECIALLY NOW, when allied TDs are actually WEAKER against meds then they used to be. Once more PLS do not quote me if your answer is going to twist what I wrote. Read again (this time sloooowly), I did not claim that Ostheer PzIV is worse than allied mediums I point out it is not "Great". Care to elaborate why in your opinion allied TDs are "weaker" vs PZ IV than they used to be? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AE's King Tiger Adventure Analysed by Someone With Eyes24 Mar 2018, 09:48 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 04:54 AMEtherealDragon Thanks for taking the time to explain that. Always nice to be a bit more informed on game mechanics. I have to disagree a bit. In sort, high linear scatter help weapons score collision shots vs vehicles moving in the line of shot. That is why most TDs have high linear scatter. In: Lobby
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 22:01 PMmurky depths If you need me to spell out why good players prefer getting P4s means Tier 3 is pretty good (as well as your own admission that the stug is OP) then this conversation is going to take a very long time. No, it is my observation that players better than I opt for tier 3 and specifically the P4 -- instead of tier 4 and the units it unlocks. They also explicitly say as much when asked. My opinion on your question is... blank since OKW is my prefered axis faction and I have about 5x as much time with OKW than Wehr. Who cares what my opinion is? Play the way you think is best. My point is quite simply ostheer Panzer IV is not "so good". Compared to other medium is sort of OK. Ostwind is not that great either. It also becomes obsolete when allied TDs show up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 15:59 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 15:43 PMmurky depths 1) lol 2) you're right, that's why top players never make a P4 when playing as wehrmacht And people make T-34/76 Sherman and Cromwell. Do you actually have a point? Is your opinion that Ostheer Panzer IV "so good" that they do not need a better tank? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How would you change coh 2?23 Mar 2018, 14:22 PM Simply solution to the same problems: For instance 222, luch and Centaur are all using a 20mm gun yet each of these weapon has different characteristics making the game more complected without improving balance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 10:53 AMJohnSmith What's wrong with that now? There's clearly two different meanings behind what he says. Keep your threads topics to your own threads. Here's a link to your own thread about this subject, please stop derailing this thread just for the sake of you vs Katitof: https://www.coh2.org/topic/68495/the-tech-cost-for-lmg-rifle-grenades-and-bundle-grenades You should focus on reading full sentences instead of trying to pick apart cross threads various words just to show to the forum obsessionally why you believe he's wrong. Dir Johnsmith since you seem to be a bit confused let me explain something to you. You are not a moderator. 90% of last post are about what I do in this forum so generally you are off topic 90% times while contributing very little in most threads. PLS stop acting like stalker and try to contribute to this forum. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 10:47 AMKatitof Take both of the posts you have quoted, keep rereading them - veeeeery slowly until the point where you no longer see any contradiction. Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 21:18 PMKatitof Or maybe its a premium tier with premium cost and units above T4 of literally any other faction with exclusively brits having a rough equivalent in form of hammer/anvil tech side tech.... Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2018, 11:33 AMKatitof Anvil and hammer ARE exclusive upgrade bundles to UKF T3, *NOT a tech.* Try writing "veeeeery slowly" you will then avoid writing contradicting things. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 21:18 PMmurky depths I don't think they're bad, but rather their tier 3 is so good they don't really need to. How often did soviet players go tier 4 when t-34 was still in tier 3? In team games, ost goes tier 4 quite regularly because those matches can take much longer. 1v1 I find rarely goes long enough for it. Tier 3 is not that good. It simply has the Stug that is OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AE's King Tiger Adventure Analysed by Someone With Eyes23 Mar 2018, 10:30 AM The missed shot that did damage the Comet can easily be explained. Explosion have AOE penetration and if the vehicle is within the explosion radius can still take damage from a shot that did not score a "natural" hit or collided. This how actually artillery work vs vehicles since it can not hit them or collide with them. In: Lobby
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 10:17 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 10:06 AMKatitof Do tech in CoH2 permanently disable other tiers once you get it? []Yes []No Mark correct answer with cross. And I have said ost T4 is premium, not cost efficient or not. As I have said about 50 times already and will say it 51st, its NOT something you will see or even want in every singular game of 1v1, but its extremely frequent sight in most 2v2 games. Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2018, 11:33 AMKatitof Vast majority of the stuff you mentioned ARE upgrades, even upgrades that prevent you from getting alternatives. You are trying waaaaaay to hard to prove a point that does not exist there, just to perceive yourself as correct. Guess what, you are not. Anvil and hammer ARE exclusive upgrade bundles to UKF T3, NOT a tech. Mortar pit and 17 pounder are no different then any other unit you get access to with tech. You are simply contradicting yourself. When ever it suits you Hammer/Anvil is tech and then suddenly it is not. The fact remains that Hammer/Anvil is worth the cost even if ones does not build a Comet/Churchill while T4 is not worth it in most cases. The rest is jut you arguing semantics to create the impression that Ostheer have an advantage with their "premium" T4. And on the matter of rocket artillery katyusha is simply more cost efficient than PW. In: COH2 Balance